Thread by @JuliaBerkowitz1

Guilters: "This verdict doesn't prove MJ was innocent. It's just about MJ's companies not being able to control MJ."

1) No trial is ever about proving someone innocent. That's impossible in most cases since it would be proving a negative.

This is why it is the accuser who has the burden of proof in a court of law. So the verdict "not proving MJ innocent" is completely meaningless here. No verdict will ever prove someone innocent.

2) Yes, a demurrer is "technical" but so is this whole lawsuit: MJ's companies are being sued because MJ is dead and they can't face him. So they try to find a way to make money of him in other ways.

3) This lawsuit is unfair towards MJ on so many levels. By suing his companies they try to circumvent the fact that MJ is dead and can't defend himself . This is unfair, because it's a basic human right for the accused to face their accusers and defend themselves.

Without MJ having that opportunity here any "liable" verdict in this case would never be fair. And would also be somewhat "technical". Definitely not on the same level as a "guilty" verdict in a criminal trial where the accused is present and able to assist his defense.

4) One thing this lawsuit does show though is that neither James Safechuck or Wade Robson have any qualms to lie under oath.

Safechuck's fans can call this verdict "technical" all they want, but the fact is that in this lawsuit James is provably lying, among other things, about having been employed by MJ's companies during the relevant period and MJ's companies and his employees being procurers of CSA.

Mind you, some of these employees are elderly, ill women who don't need this nonsense in their lives. It shows how utterly unscrupulous James/Wade are to accuse these people of these things (and MJ) when they know damn well these people had nothing to do with their alleged abuse.

They claim this is not about money, but the fact that they sue companies that they hardly had anything to do with and that they can't even find a way to link to their alleged abuse, instead of suing their mother shows that IS all about the money, so that is a lie too.