"Singapore, UK ink free trade deal with eye on digital economy talks in 2021"
Liz Truss managed to find the "Copy" button again...
Expect a flurry of jingoistic self-congratulation for something that "largely replicates" the EU's FTA. (What's missing?) straitstimes.com/business/econo…
"UK strikes Singapore and Vietnam trade deals, start of new era of trade with Asia"
More detail, wrapped in cloying self-congratulatory guff, on the UK Government website.
(Headline says "start of a new era". Body text emphasises this preserves the benefits of previous FTA.)
Don't get me wrong. It's good news they're rolled over. Better that than the alternative!
But this is neither an epic demonstration of Britain's mighty trade negotiation prowess, nor is it the "start" of anything new.
It is exactly what it is, nothing more.
For context, the official analysis of the EU's trade deal with Singapore found that it would increase UK GDP by £95 million (with an "M") in the long run.
Because he's announced it today but it's only coming into effect on Wednesday, you can expect the usual wild excesses tonight and tomorrow from the subset of people who always seem to treat this sort of thing as the last day before the asteroid hits.
Oddity: London is so dangerous now that it requires Tier 3 restrictions, but from 23-27 December it will be perfectly fine for Londoners to spread their wings all over the UK (and for people to flock to London to visit people there).
The Express currently has *23* Brexit stories on the front page of its online edition.
Every one of them is a lie, distortion or fabrication.
It is not really *that* surprising that their readers have misunderstood the whole Brexit thing...
Since the referendum (and in the run-up to it too) anyone relying on the Express for "news" will have been exposed to thousands, maybe tens of thousands of stories about Brexit.
These paint a *consistently misleading* picture, ie they're wrong, but build on each other.
How can one expect people to be informed when faced with such a barrage of brainwashing?
But there is one thing the Express might be able to twist, but it won't be able to hide: shortages in the shops.
It will take the EU a surprisingly short time to recover from Brexit.
1) They have already (in effect) replaced our trade since the referendum. 2) Their borders are ready. 3) Each of our 27 competitors has the might of the EU behind them. 4) More jobs and capital will flee.
5) They will have significantly more bandwidth to devote to other issues (eg trade deals: 100% of their negotiators will be able to get back to their primary role of signing up new partners) 6) We have sabotaged our competitiveness further by axing VAT-free shopping for tourists
7) Hauliers who aren't already avoiding the UK will see the chaos at the ports, and give us a wide berth 8) The rapid switch to electric cars forces all auto manufacturers to completely rejig their plants *anyway* so more will take the opportunity to leave
THREAD: Here are the essential points from the EU's time-limited, limited effect no-deal Brexit mitigation offer.
(Most concessions are unilateral measures it will implement. Some require UK cooperation - not clear what happens if we refuse to do so!) ec.europa.eu/info/sites/inf…
Air travel
"Unless there is a contingency measure in place on air transport at the end of the transition period, air traffic between the EU and the United Kingdom will be interrupted."
The EU is proposing 6 months of reciprocal concessions to keep (most) planes flying.
However, they're not offering any concessions on airline ownership requirements, so BA for one may come unstuck here (depending on how its restructured shareholding is going). Its message: you already had plenty of time to prepare, including a grace period.