There seems to be this binary idea that if you call out someone involved in the #endsars movement for bullshit you are calling out the whole movement. This is false. Policy brutality has a long history going back to colonial times, this is not in dispute.
Protest demanding change and justice is unquestionably the right thing to do. However, some are not amplifying these righteous calls for action in good faith.
In October 2020, a a video of the killing of a young man by SARS officers in the town of Ughelli sparked long-standing opposition to SARS into a national cause. So why then were there internet armies of bots and disinformation campaigns gearing up through 2020, as early as May?
Before you say that I a implying the reaction in October was planned, that is not what I am saying. I am saying there are external interests that were aware of a very real issue that they knew would eventually spark.
They just didn’t know exactly when. When it did, they mobilized and used a just cause for nefarious ends, discrediting the real cause of anger, causing neighbor to distrust neighbor, and sowing chaos generally. They flood the zone with sh*t and created a disinformation buffet.
@DarrenLinvill@plwarre Saw the @rollingstone article. I think there is a new element to the current disinformation campaign being waged that makes it unprecedented, and it is not the unprecedented cheap reach afforded the Russian campaigns. The Russian campaign is a the same
thing on steroids. I think what is being missed is there is a new actor in this using the same tactics previously only available to nation states and their intelligence services. This is where the cheap reach makes a difference. It has permitted private actors to enter the
information war. One private actor specifically has interests that align with the Russian disinformation campaign, although for slightly different reasons. These interests, as you mention, are to spread fear, uncertainty, doubt,