Today was Pfizer Vaccine Day @US_FDA, and the expert panel just recommended EUA approval tinyurl.com/y5u84jmx Next: FDA deliberates, but expect an EUA in next 1-2 days. As with All-Things-Covid, nothing is easy; now the hard part begins.
2/ Today: quick state of the pandemic, then potpourri of vaccine-related stuff.
SF still in our first true surge. @ucsfhospitals 39 Covid pts, 10 on vents (Fig). Test pos 11.9% in symptomatic pts, 1.6 in asymptomatics, both way up. In SF, cases now 181/d (vs ~30/d last mth)…
3/ …& 129 Covid pts in SF hospitals (vs ~25 last mth; Fig). Luckily, deaths have not yet ticked up: 165, still lowest rate in U.S. But with this many people in ICUs, more deaths can’t be far behind. SF test positivity rate is 3.4%, rising but still well below CA’s rate of 8.8%.
4/ Nationally: surges everywhere. Midwest cooled a bit but now heating up again (Fig). Any Thanksgiving effect should be evident by now – yet curves haven’t changed much. I think we ARE seeing an effect: 6-8 wks into a surge, media coverage, stern warnings by health officials...
5/ …& various flavors of shutdown would normally result in sharp fall in cases/hospitalizations. The fact that our surges are continuing unabated is due to Thxgiving. Expect same for X-mas; it might not cause a "surge" but will prevent the current one from ending before January.
6/ Now to vaccines: so much to chew on! @NEJM fig below is striking: it shows not only the breathtaking effectiveness of Pfizer vaccine, but also that vaccine starts working ~10d after first dose. Expect a lot of talk re: if this means that a one-dose vaccine regimen would be OK.
7/ Little doubt that 2 doses is optimal, since overall efficacy after one dose seems to be in the 50-85% range. Two doses gets you to 95%, and also likely to more durable immunity. But this thread by @zeynep captures the pragmatic macro-level question tinyurl.com/y5am4kvs …
8/ …namely, given a vaccine shortage, would a 1-dose regimen (which doubles amount of available vaccine) have a positive tradeoff at a societal level. Nobody’s done a detailed risk-benefit analysis or the relevant studies to answer question of 1 dose vs. 2, but it's obvious…
9/ …that 1 dose would allow more people to be vaccinated sooner, at the price of some loss of efficacy. For now, we should embrace the 2-dose regimen (which is what the FDA will approve); personally, I want 2 doses when it's my turn. But this deserves a detailed analysis, ASAP.
10/ Most striking @moderna_tx data was 30/30 severe cases were in placebo pts. Pfizer had 1 “severe” case in vaccine group (9 in placebo) – it was a pt w/ minor dip in oxygen – a clinical nothing-burger. So both vaccines are ~100% effective in preventing truly severe cases – wow.
11/ Let’s turn to distribution. The fact that @UCSFHospitals – a huge, highly competent system – is scrambling to figure out how to vaccinate its own (~12,000) employees makes clear how hard this is going to be to vaccinate everyone, such as residents of rural nursing homes, …
12/ …or how CVS will sort out if someone’s an essential worker or has a co-morbidity that merits early vaccination. I’ve gotten a few emails from SF MDs (not affiliated w/ UCSF) asking how they’ll get their shots. Answer: nobody knows. Thousands of such details to be worked out.
13/ There’s new and semi-conflicting data on vaccine hesitancy. On the one hand, a new @AP poll – taken after the positive news on vaccines – showed that only 47% of people were sure they’d be vaccinated; concerning tinyurl.com/y5am4kvs On other hand, new @axios-@Ipsos poll…
14/ … tinyurl.com/ya4tbtpk found, while only 51% said they were likely to take the vaccine on day 1, 70% would take it if the vaccine is “proven safe and effective by public health officials.” I’m hoping this FDA process crosses that proof bar; it certainly does for me.
15/ I’m less worried than some people are re: vaccine uptake, mostly because we won’t have enough for 3-6 months. If some people are skeptical and prefer to wait, plenty of others will take their spot. Over time, I think many vaccine skeptics will come around after they see…
16/…their friends get shots, do ok, & feel less anxious about living life. Many will want to wait a few months, which would sync up nicely w/ timing when we're likely to have enough vaccine to go around. Of course, we’ll have to guard against overreacting to every side effect…
17/ … As I showed last wk, thousands of people will have heart attacks, strokes, and new diagnoses of cancer within months after receiving a perfectly safe vaccine. These will be coincidences. It will take vigorous public education to counter concerns that arise from such cases.
18/ One hiccup: on UK's 1st day of vaccination, 2 folks w/ histories of severe allergies had anaphylactic reactions to Pfizer vaccine. Both did OK w/ treatment. UK quickly declared that people w/ history of severe allergies should defer vaccination. Probably right call for now…
19/ …but let’s be sure before we forever exclude such people from vaccination. As @DrPaulOffit said at today’s FDA hearing, tens of millions of Americans carry EpiPens, so such a rule, if permanent, would exclude tons of people from vaccine. For more, see below from @statnews...
20/ We also need to be prepared to hear many tales of bad days after vaccinations (arm pain, fever, etc) – particularly in younger folks after 2nd dose. Quips Offit: “[These side effects] mean you’re having a vigorous immune response...The immune response needs a better PR team.”
21/ As vaccine rollout begins, second guessing re: why there’s a shortage will grow. Today’s @nytimes The Daily tinyurl.com/y5f2w2r5 discussed how Op Warp Speed turned down chance to buy tens of millions of doses of Pfizer vaccine. I’m mildly sympathetic: OWS got a lot right…
22/ …, and if OWS had spent another few billion bucks buying a vaccine that proved to be a dud, we’d be talking about THAT scandal. But in retrospect, it was a bad error & will markedly slow down the roll-out. Hopefully other vaccines will fill the gap, but it’s not so simple….
23/ … since next up after the @moderna_tx vaccine (which should be approved next week) is @AstraZeneca vaccine. Though once felt to be the leading contender, it now appears to have a lower (~70%) efficacy, and its rollout has been surprisingly gaffe-prone tinyurl.com/yxqlrymn
24/ While the challenging rollout, OWS's Pfizer buy, & the AstraZ glitches all raise concerns, let's keep them in perspective. In the face of a raging pandemic that’s killing 3,000/d, and a U.S. death toll that will soon equal the population of Pittsburgh, we now have vaccines...
25/…that are safe & remarkably effective. The next phase will be bumpy, and we’ll undoubtedly make more errors and have to make mid-course adjustments. But the evidence is easily good enough to begin vaccinating the U.S. population, just as fast as we can. So let’s get started!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The juxtaposition is jarring: the first U.S. vaccine recipient on the day we hit 300,000 deaths. So much tragedy amid the hopefulness. Today, after an update on SF, I’ll lay out some complex issues that will play out in the next few months.
2/ San Francisco is now seeing its first big surge, & everybody's asking when the city will turn things around. After having stomped on the curve in March & quickly turned back a surge in June, I thought – if anybody can control this surge – it would be SF. I may have been wrong.
3/ The curve of SF hospitalizations (Fig) shows no signs of plateau after 6 wks, despite stay-at-home orders (note that June surge had plateaued by 6 wks). The combo of pandemic fatigue, colder weather, and the holidays has given the virus the upper hand. We’re losing the battle.
Tonight a brief update on our local situation, as 5 Bay Area counties announce that the region will adopt CA’s stay-at-home orders, even before we hit the state’s 15% ICU capacity threshold. tinyurl.com/y3ou56qq It's a prudent move.
2/ Nobody wants to go backwards – we're all bummed out and exhausted. But in judging the decisions by the governor and our Bay Area leaders, I’m influenced by the words of former @HHSGov secretary @GovMikeLeavitt, below:
3/ The viral dynamics of Covid make it even harder to react in a timely way – we always have a tendency to act late as the hospitalizations we're seeing now reflect the behaviors and conditions of two weeks ago. It’s like looking at a star: what you see now happened a while ago.
The vaccine news remains astoundingly positive. Reacting to my upbeat mood, a reporter asked me if there’s anything that keeps me up at night. Aside from the cataclysmic current state of Covid (likely to get worse, I fear), there are a few:
2/ First, the question of who gets the vaccine first is tricky. (Breaking news: @CDCgov panel just weighed in: tinyurl.com/y53atcys, and I agree.)
One can make a case for many groups to be first in line: healthcare workers; people >65 in nursing homes; essential workers…
3/ …(like food handlers, police, firefighters, & teachers); and people at high risk for bad outcomes (people over 65 and those w/ preexisting conditions). One can make an argument for all of them to get vaccinated as soon as possible. Alas, we quickly run into a math problem…
Lots going on – I’ll try to go a bit beyond the headlines. Let’s start with a brief Public Service Announcement, then the Covid situation in SF, vaccine distribution, a little on schools, and then a crazy case of pharmaceutical serendipity.
2/ Short PSA: your plans for T-giving are set. My recommendation: add 10% more caution than you were planning. Open the windows, keep a fan going, sit 7 feet apart, not 6. Something. It might make a difference. And then enjoy, without guilt.
3/ On to SF. While we’re definitely “surging” here, we began at such a low baseline that our numbers are still fairly benign. It doesn’t mean they’ll stay that way, particularly if Thanksgiving brings people and virus closer together. And it definitely could do that (see #2).
I’ll start with a few SF & national updates, then summarize a few key points, mostly focused on the vaccine segment.
2/ Local update: interesting disconnect between cases vs. hospitalizations/deaths here in SF & @UCSFHospitals. While cases up in SF, @UCSF, we’re still pretty stable (Fig L): 15 pts, only 1 on vent. Test + rate mildly up: 4.85% in pts w/ symptoms; 0.78% in those without (Fig R).
3/ SF cases are still spiking, though maybe (wishful thinking?) a tiny plateau (Fig L), now 95/day. Hospitalizations pretty stable @ 41, 2x of two wks ago but not skyrocketing (Fig R). Deaths stable: 156 since start of Covid. Test positivity 1.97%: also up but still fairly good.
One of the features of this stage of Covid is that we’re seeing more areas in which two or more complex issues influence one another. Today, I’ll cover a few of the most interesting ones – issues for which Venn diagram thinking is useful.
2/ The big one, of course, is the explosion of cases and hospitalizations around the U.S. – coming alongside a flood of positive news regarding vaccines. It feels like we're watching a Covid split-screen; on one screen a horror film, on the other a feel-good rom-com.
3/ Now that we’re looking at a pandemic that may be all-but-gone by fall (and an economy that may spring back), the case for fast, vigorous action to flatten the curve is even stronger. Obviously, the politics are hard (see: Michigan), but the right calls seem easier to identify.