Share this page!

AG Profile picture
Twitter logo
11 Dec, 4 tweets, 2 min read
As more reporting comes out regarding the Hunter Biden investigation, it's hard to forget the extensive pressure campaign from certain dishonest actors to ensure that no reporter could remotely cover the story without being attacked:
Don't forget the "reporters" who insisted they can't cover or even look into the story because they didn't have access to the laptop (yet they apparently can now?):
And this WaPo article really gave away the game regarding the media's approach at the time:

“treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a foreign intelligence operation — even if they probably aren’t.”

washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/1…
One more thing worth looking back at in the context of the recent news:

@BoKnowsNews was one of the few mainstream reporters that asked about the Hunter Biden story. Biden attacked him for it. Way too many other reporters sided with Biden.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with AG

AG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AGHamilton29

AG Profile picture
11 Dec
I'll ask again: where do ACB and Kavanaugh (& the other conservative justices) go for their apologies from Dems and members of the press who repeatedly painted them as Trump shills that will consistently make partisan decisions based purely on desired political outcomes?
The people who pushed this nonsense were just revealing that’s what they expected form judges they support. They expect policy wins from the court, regardless of whether they are legally justified.
And it’s especially weird for those who think Trump is dishonest and can’t be trusted to cite random comments from him to justify a smear against Justices whose records and own statements made clear that they were undeserving of those smears.
Read 4 tweets
AG Profile picture
7 Dec
Brutal.

Sidney Powell's Michigan lawsuit gets destroyed.

You can expect something similar for the versions in other states this week.
The Judge catches on to the fact that the plaintiffs obviously know these cases aren't actually winnable, which means they are bringing them just to make the accusations without proving them to fool people into thinking they are legitimate. Image
Second Powell lawsuit dismissed today:
Read 4 tweets
AG Profile picture
7 Dec
I keep getting this response from some people. I’m just pointing out conspiracies are increasingly common. As for level, a few months ago a ton of elected Dems, media outlets, and pundits coordinated to promote a baseless conspiracy that Trump was using USPS to steal the election
Here is a useful thread from @DrewHolden360 as a useful reminder of how widespread this conspiracy got:
My favorite were the comparisons to watergate.

Here were a few of my threads at the time debunking the conspiracy:



Read 5 tweets
AG Profile picture
4 Dec
There were exactly 0 precincts in MI with 100% or over 100% turnout. This is an easily verifiable fact as the precinct data is available by County. The guy testifying did this repeatedly. He pretended to be giving intelligent data while saying things that are clearly false.
If someone is willing to lie to you about something that is that easy to verify, why would you pay attention to anything else that they say?
Here was another great one from this “expert”. He pretends to do this complicated analysis showing that machines couldn’t possibly count as many ballots as were reported over a short time relying on audience not knowing those counties reported absentee ballots in batches.
Read 4 tweets
AG Profile picture
3 Dec
Hilarious. My mentions kept telling me to tune in to the MI Rudy hearing because they had an expert proving the conspiracy. I tune in and some guy BSing with several conspiracies about Dominion that sound super intelligent if you know nothing about the actual topic (40M etc,)
so then one Rep intelligently asks the obvious question: wouldn't a hand recount prove whether the software change ballots?

So OF COURSE, the "expert" then suggested a new conspiracy that they cd have also put in fake paper ballots to match the software change.
Just watch this video of one of the main witnesses at the MI Guliani hearing hysterically ranting about complete nonsense as a Republican legislator tries to ask her a question:
Read 5 tweets
AG Profile picture
1 Dec
This is the second person she has done this to! newsweek.com/georgia-republ…

I have no idea how this whole fiasco doesn’t end with her losing her law license.
Omg. Powell asked the court in her WISCONSIN lawsuit to get her security camera footage from the location where they processed Detroit (Michigan) ballots. #HeadDesk
Crazy. This is such a blatant ethical violation.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @AGHamilton29 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @AGHamilton29!

Read all threads by @AGHamilton29