I'll ask again: where do ACB and Kavanaugh (& the other conservative justices) go for their apologies from Dems and members of the press who repeatedly painted them as Trump shills that will consistently make partisan decisions based purely on desired political outcomes?
The people who pushed this nonsense were just revealing that’s what they expected form judges they support. They expect policy wins from the court, regardless of whether they are legally justified.
And it’s especially weird for those who think Trump is dishonest and can’t be trusted to cite random comments from him to justify a smear against Justices whose records and own statements made clear that they were undeserving of those smears.
The irony is that Trump, thanks to Mitch McConnell, filled the court with exactly the type of Justices that prioritize the Constitution, the facts, and their legal philosophies over any personal political preferences.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As more reporting comes out regarding the Hunter Biden investigation, it's hard to forget the extensive pressure campaign from certain dishonest actors to ensure that no reporter could remotely cover the story without being attacked:
Don't forget the "reporters" who insisted they can't cover or even look into the story because they didn't have access to the laptop (yet they apparently can now?):
The Judge catches on to the fact that the plaintiffs obviously know these cases aren't actually winnable, which means they are bringing them just to make the accusations without proving them to fool people into thinking they are legitimate.
I keep getting this response from some people. I’m just pointing out conspiracies are increasingly common. As for level, a few months ago a ton of elected Dems, media outlets, and pundits coordinated to promote a baseless conspiracy that Trump was using USPS to steal the election
There were exactly 0 precincts in MI with 100% or over 100% turnout. This is an easily verifiable fact as the precinct data is available by County. The guy testifying did this repeatedly. He pretended to be giving intelligent data while saying things that are clearly false.
If someone is willing to lie to you about something that is that easy to verify, why would you pay attention to anything else that they say?
Here was another great one from this “expert”. He pretends to do this complicated analysis showing that machines couldn’t possibly count as many ballots as were reported over a short time relying on audience not knowing those counties reported absentee ballots in batches.
Hilarious. My mentions kept telling me to tune in to the MI Rudy hearing because they had an expert proving the conspiracy. I tune in and some guy BSing with several conspiracies about Dominion that sound super intelligent if you know nothing about the actual topic (40M etc,)
so then one Rep intelligently asks the obvious question: wouldn't a hand recount prove whether the software change ballots?
So OF COURSE, the "expert" then suggested a new conspiracy that they cd have also put in fake paper ballots to match the software change.
Just watch this video of one of the main witnesses at the MI Guliani hearing hysterically ranting about complete nonsense as a Republican legislator tries to ask her a question:
Omg. Powell asked the court in her WISCONSIN lawsuit to get her security camera footage from the location where they processed Detroit (Michigan) ballots. #HeadDesk