I really wish that these sorts of views didn't exist and people understood what the purpose of society was but then .... as a good friend said "capitalism tends to rot the brain" ->
X : This is fake?
Me : Try using the search function but that's not the point. The question you could ask is whether the person is fake but that still misses the point. The real question is whether such views exist. You already know the answer to that.
X : Examples?
Me : Spend some time with bitcoin extremists.
X : Do you mean bitcoin maximalists?
Me : Sorry, my mistake. Spend some time with bitcoin terrorists.
X : Why terrorists?
Me : Bitcoin is a weapon. A payload of laissez faire and a delivery mechanism of greed. The idea of market led everything with no government is about as dumb as you get. We've also tried it before, several times, with the same results - newrepublic.com/article/159662…
X : Communism has also failed.
Me : Communism sucks, same as Laissez faire. They're both extreme viewpoints peddled by people with extreme ideologies. Try using mixed methods i.e. treat the market and central planning as tools with appropriate contexts.
X : How do you do that?
Me : Well, obviously we need to up situational awareness a lot but before this we need to have a discussion on the balance between the ethics of care and the ethics of choice, society needs to discuss the balance between the We and the Me.
X : Is that happening?
Me : No. Not whilst some outrageously beneift and can keep others pre-occupied on scrambling to just make a living. This is why universal basic income is highly political, heaven help us if people had the chance to discuss how to create a fair society.
X : Any solutions?
Me : The greatest human to walk the earth told us how.
X : ?
Me : Martin Luther King. We need to become "maladjusted" -
X : Where to start?
Me : Already have.
X : ?
Me : On the 15th September, I will not engage with the market. I will give to my local community and I will apologise to my son for the society we have created - ... I call it my day of #renewal
X : One day?
Me : You have to start somewhere. Every journey starts with a single step.
X : Why apologise?
Me : We are the guardians of the future. We have created this society which is dominated by a focus on the self, on the individual. We shoulder the blame.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Wardley

Simon Wardley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @swardley

14 Dec
X : Have you ever built a guild on World of Warcraft?
Me : Long ago. It was substantial but not in the league of the largest guilds which are 900+ ... never made it that far. However, you can build much larger guilds on EVE online. It's good management training, I'd recommend it.
If you want executive training in this space then Fernado Flores is where to look - pluralisticnetworks.com/?q=home
X : You mean a corp on EVE online.
Me : I know. It's the same thing.
Read 12 tweets
13 Dec
I've just received the email. I've donated money to Labour but never to buy privilege. Early bird access to events? Bi-annual meetings with senior Labour figures for "Gold" members? Exclusive "Gold" member receptions ... this is supposed to be a party for all. Is this a joke? ->
I don't mind donating to the war chest but I've certainly got a huge problem with a party that wants to sell privileges. This is a question of values and behaviours. I can't easily square this, an ethics of choice i.e. the transaction?
So, it now becomes a question of whether on balance does it do more benefit to remain a member or not. On one side, I want to support my local CLP and help them as much as possible. They try, ever so hard, to support the local community ...
Read 5 tweets
13 Dec
X : Do you think cloud will decentralise?
Me : Already has - started with regions and AZs and is now rapidly expanding into outpost, greengrass, EKS anwhere.
X : No, I mean many providers.
Me : There are two forms of decentralisation - provision and control (i.e. authorities) ...
... what is happening is decentralisation of provision (i.e. cloud everywhere, at the edge) but under centralised authorities (Amazon, Alibaba, MSFT, Google etc).
X : What about decentralisation of control?
Me : Many companies working to a common standard ...
... that was the dream of OpenStack but they blew that on day one creating a collective prisoner dilemma. They are trying to recorrect this with K8s but the cloud has moved on, higher up the stack ...
Read 24 tweets
11 Dec
X : Given brexit and covid, what is the best way for the UK economy to recover? Gov investment?
Me : Rapidly?
X : Yes.
Me : Huge investment, about £500bn.
X : Any specific industries?
Me : Yes. People. Universal Basic Income of £12.500 p.a. That'll do it.
X : £500bn?
Me : You can bring this down to about £250bn by making the flat rate of tax 40%. Or you could go further, a flat rate of 50% and still no-one would lose out with less than £50k p.a. You'd get more money into the hands of people that spend it.
X : How accurate are those figures?
Me : Back of napkin. You could easily do a universal basic income, there are other savings, you might have to look at some redistribution but the upside would be a huge injection into the economy including entrepreneurial freedom.
Read 4 tweets
10 Dec
X : How do you destroy a collective?
Me : Lots on ways. Are you talking about a collective you belong to?
X : Another collective
Me : Again, lots of ways. Can I ask why?
X : Climate denial.
Me : Wow, ok you're not messing. Well, I don't like them, so if you're serious then ...
Step 1. Any collective will have individuals that tend to have power. They do so for reasons of personal agency. The first thing you need to identify is the people of power. Image
Step 2. Any collective has accepted behaviours that support their values. People also belong to multiple collectives (i.e. they may belong to that group plus maybe a nation). You need to identify the behaviours / values of each of the collectives. Image
Read 13 tweets
10 Dec
X : You spelt attention wrong.
Me : What? It happens. You could have said "attention is spelt wrong on the map". I like to blame the map for errors rather than the person because it diffuses politics and enables us to challenge the assumptions made without challenging the person. Image
X : Dyson sphere is not near custom built, it's barely in genesis.
Me : Good point. I need to modify that map. Now, we're gettng somewhere. The biggest headache I have with stories inside corporates is you can't challenge the story without challenging the executive.
X : What's the "∨" about?
Me : OR ... i.e. generation is this OR that OR that. Not XOR (exclusive), as it can be many.
X : The "∧"?
Me : AND ... cup of tea is Tea AND cup AND hot water.
X : The "!"
Me : NOT .... i.e. NOT poison.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!