A thread on, and chronology of, past 20 years of discussions, debates and discourses around farm reforms — which committee said what — says end the tyranny of APMC and Essential Commodities Act, allow farmers to flourish
[Links to all primary documents below.]

1/n
19 December 2000: Expert Committee set up by the Ministry of Agriculture under the chairmanship of Shankerlal Guru.
• Call for ideas to promote agricultural growth
• Ensure that a greater share of the ultimate price of the agricultural produce goes to farmers
2/n
29 June 2001: Shankerlal Guru Committee submits report
• Practically, farmer has no liberty to sell his produce in his village or to retail chain, processor, bulk buyer directly
• Remodel APMCs
3/n
1 July 2001: Report of Task Force on Employment Opportunities, chaired by Montek Singh Ahluwalia
• The Essential Commodities Act should be repealed
• It is absolutely essential to liberalise [APMC] and allow competing markets to be set up.
4/n
4 July 2001: RCA Jain Task Force
• All State governments should amend their respective APMC laws
• Enable private and cooperative sectors to establish agricultural marketing infrastructure and supporting services
• Delink MSP from procurement
5/n
9 September 2003: Model APMC Act
• Section 14: No compulsion on growers to sell produce through markets administered by APMC
• Chapter VII: a new Chapter on ‘Contract Farming’
• Provision made for direct sale of farm produce without routing it through notified markets
6/n
29 December 2004: National Commission on Farmers (NCF), chaired by M.S. Swaminathan, First Report
• Amend APMC Act, decentralise the system, permit marketing by other players to achieve goal of ensuring better returns to the growers and good quality products to consumers
7/n
11 August 2005: NCF, Swaminathan, Second Report
• Reforms in APMC Acts necessary for creating a nation-wide integration of the agriculture markets
• Review the Essential Commodities Act
8/n
December 2005: FAO Report
• Essential Commodities Act has outlived its utility
• APMC Act a major hurdle on free movement of primary agriculture products, results in double taxation, creates monopolies
• Policy should give farmers liberty to market their produce anywhere
9/n
29 December 2005: NCF, Swaminathan, Third Report
• The Essential Commodities Act, 1955…may be put under suspended animation for the present and revived if any emergency situation develops, for a limited time, for a specific commodity and in a specified area
10/n
29 December 2005: NCF, Swaminathan, Third Report (cont)
• APMCs have failed to provide adequate infrastructure at the mandis
• APMCs have also not played any significant role in bringing better market information to farmers
11/n
13 August 2006: NCF, Swaminathan, Fourth Report
• Essential Commodities Act and APMC Acts need to be reviewed in order to meet the requirements of modern agriculture and attracting private capital in this sector
• Farmer wants different options for marketing his produce
12/n
4 October 2006: NCF, Swaminathan, Fifth Report, Volume 1
• APMCs need to change their role from regulatory to developmental
• Encourage, support farmer’s cooperatives and private sector to operate the wholesale agriculture produce markets and provide competition to APMCs
13/n
4 October 2006: NCF, Swaminathan, Fifth Report, Volume 2
• Essential Commodities Act…acted to the detriment of interest of the farmers
• Farmers selling their produce in APMC feel that traders and management connive and often cheat them
14/n
4 October 2006: NCF, Swaminathan, Fifth Report, Volume 2 (cont)
• Need for greater say of farmers in managing APMCs particularly in auction system
• NGO should be permitted to buy directly from farmers
• Benefits of APMCs have not reached small, marginal, medium farmers
14/n
February 2012: Economic Survey 2011-12, Ch 8
• Mandi governance is an area of concern
• Perishables could be taken out of the ambit of APMC
• Recent episodes of inflation in vegetables and fruits have exposed flaws in our supply chains
15/n
February 2012: Economic Survey 2011-12, Ch 8 (cont)
• As APMC was created to protect interests of farmers it will be in the fitness of things to give farmers the choice of going to the PMC
• The need is to pursue further reforms in the state APMC Acts
16/n
22 January 2013: Committee of State Ministers
• APMC Act, Essential Commodities Act need to be amended to ensure barrier free storage, movement of agricultural commodities across States
• This will help contain price fluctuations, ensure optimum management of supply chain
17/n
February 2013: Economic Survey 2012-13, Ch 8
• Many states yet to adopt the Model Act
• It is necessary to complete the process of market reforms to provide farmers an alternative competitive marketing channel for their agricultural produce at remunerative prices
18/n
February 2014: Economic Survey 2013-14, Ch 8
• Examine APMC Act, Essential Commodities Act, and any structures whose provisions are restrictive and create barriers to free trade
•Examine inclusion of agri taxes underGST
• Incentivise private sector to scale up investments
19/n
February 2015: Economic Survey 2014-15, Vol I, Ch 8
• Though market fee is collected like a tax, revenue earned by APMCs does not go to State exchequer, does not require the approval of State legislature to utilise the funds
• Thus APMC operations are hidden from scrutiny
20/n
August 2017: Economic Survery 2016-17 Vol 2, Ch 7
• Price risks emanating from an inefficient APMC market are severe for farmers in India
• Need to remove restrictions on internal trade on agricultural commodities, dismantle fragmented legislations that govern agriculture
21/n
3 January 2019: Standing Committee on Agriculture (2018-2019
• Scarcity of marketing platforms and mismanagement and corruption in APMC markets have created a situation where farmers are being deprived of fruits of their hard-earned labour leading to low price realisation
22/n
Standing Committee (cont)
• Urgent need for radical reform in APMC Act to provide justice to farmers
• Remunerative pricing for farmers cannot be ensured unless marketing platforms for farm produce are enhanced, functioning of APMC markets made democratic and transparent
n/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gautam Chikermane

Gautam Chikermane Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gchikermane

30 Jul
Second quarter of global GDP in 2020 is bleeding: a growing thread on contracting economies...
Germany's GDP contracts by 10.1% in second quarter

dw.com/en/coronavirus…
The U.S. economy shrinks by 9.5% in second quarter of 2020, an annual rate of 32.9%

washingtonpost.com/business/2020/…
Read 15 tweets
14 Jul
All those cheering UK policy banning #5G equipment from #Huawei, calm down.

Thread...
Policy: Buying new Huawei #5G equipment banned after 31 December 2020.

Implication: Nothing -- UK telecommunications firms are free to buy all #Huawei equipment they want, and more, over the next five months.
Policy: Existing ban on Huawei from most sensitive ‘core’ parts of 5G network remains.

Implication: Nothing -- no change from previous policy.
Read 6 tweets
28 May
Until China reforms, Made in China firms must be treated with as much caution and precaution as India is treating the Made in China pandemic
orfonline.org/expert-speak/t…

My essay in @orfonline argues why #Huawei must not be allowed into India's #5G
#Ladakh
India will not be alone in rejecting #Huawei.
UK proposes a D10 club of democratic partners for #5G:
-- G7
-- Australia
-- South Korea
-- India

thetimes.co.uk/article/downin…
Apart from a thin ideological constituency and vested business interests, China has limited appeal left in much of India’s imagination
orfonline.org/expert-speak/t…

Excerpt from my essay in @orfonline
Read 5 tweets
23 May
The primary issue around Clause 7.1 is that the right to property as a fundamental right was snatched away from Indians in 1978.

A short thread...
Between 1951 through 1976, seven amendments—1st (1951), 4th (1955), 17th (1964), 25th (1971), 39th (1975), 40th (1976), and 42nd (1976)—were brought in, all of which were struck down by the Supreme Court.
Finally, with the 44th Amendment (1978) and the repeal of Article 19(1)(f), the right to property was taken away.
With two exceptions:
1. Minorities to establish and administer educational institutions.
2. Persons holding land for personal cultivation within the ceiling limit.
Read 5 tweets
26 Apr
Sorry @irsassociation @finmin @nsitharaman: these measures will be inadequate to derail the Indian economy.
Here are some ideas that may help.
All citations from my 2018 book, 70 Policies that Shaped India (@orfonline).
Download here orfonline.org/wp-content/upl…
1/n
Just 40% tax on the rich? It’s is too low. The rich are parasites, rogues, anti-national. You can do better.
The tax should be raised to 93.5% as Indira Gandhi had in her 1970 Budget.
And don’t forget the 15% surcharge that took the marginal rate of tax to 97.5%.
[Page 51]
2/n
Why only 'tax' income of the rich? Stop their income, period.
Learn from Finance Minister Y.B. Chavan, who in his May 1971 Budget put a monthly salary ceiling of Rs 5,000 and Rs 1,000 as perquisites.
“…which go ill with norms of egalitarian society.”
[Page 52]
3/n
Read 18 tweets
20 Apr
ALERT: a #tweetstorm on the recent work of @orfonline scholars on and around #COVID19 follows.
Do read and share these cutting-end analyses.

#EachOneReachOne
1/n
Harsh Pant and @KartikBommakan1: China is using #COVID19 as an opportunity for potential Chinese military action
orfonline.org/expert-speak/c…

#EachOneReachOne
2/n
.@TanushreeChand4: As the world soldiers on to combat #COVID19, another global catastrophe involving higher stakes and no cure looms large — the threat posed by unmitigated climate change orfonline.org/expert-speak/l…

#EachOneReachOne
3/n
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!