1/ Why the price to sales ratio (P/S) is a useful tool for crypto investors 👇

The price to sales ratio compares a protocol’s market cap to its revenues. A low ratio could imply that the protocol is undervalued and vice versa.
2/ The P/S ratio is an ideal valuation method for early-stage protocols, which often have little or no net income.

Instead, the P/S ratio focuses on the usage of a protocol, by tracking the total fees paid (revenue) by the users of its service. More info: tokenterminal.com/faq
3/ We’re in a historically unique position, with early-stage & high-growth startups operating transparently on-chain.

This transparency makes it possible to find protocols with high usage relative to market cap.
4/ Top dapps from Token Terminal sorted based on the price to sales (P/S) ratio.

Note: Maker has gone from a high P/S ratio to #3 in a matter of months after raising the stability fees for DAI.

Also, two currently similar AMMs (Uniswap & SushiSwap) have the lowest P/S ratios.
5/ Let's look at the P/S ratios from a historical perspective.

The P/S ratio is calculated by dividing a project’s fully-diluted market cap by its annualized revenues.

The metric itself does not tell us about the growth patterns in a protocol’s market cap or revenues.
6/ Uniswap’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and market cap (left Y-axis).

There seems to be a pretty direct correlation between the (low) P/S ratio & market cap --> revenues have been consistently high since the launch of the $UNI token.
7/ Uniswap’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and daily total revenue (left Y-axis).

Uniswap’s daily revenues have been consistently high during Q3-Q4 --> fluctuations in market cap have been the primary driver for changes in the P/S ratio.
8/ Sushiswap’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and market cap (left Y-axis).

There does not seem to be a direct correlation between the (low) P/S ratio and market cap.
9/ Sushiswap’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and daily total revenue (left Y-axis).

Surges in Sushiswap’s daily revenues have trended its P/S ratio lower both during its launch and also more recently.
10/ Compound’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and market cap (left Y-axis).

Compound’s market cap has been stable since the launch of $COMP. Its P/S ratio trended quickly to a low double-digit figure --> revenues spiked after the launch of its token.
11/ Compound’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and daily total revenue (left Y-axis).

Compound’s daily revenues spiked up significantly with the launch of the $COMP token and associated liquidity mining.
12/ Kyber’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and market cap (left Y-axis).

There seems to have been a pretty direct correlation between the P/S ratio & market cap during the early days --> revenues were low initially, but have been on an upward trend since.
13/ Kyber’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and daily total revenue (left Y-axis).

Kyber’s daily revenues were relatively low in the beginning but have been on an upward trend for the past two years.
14/ Synthetix’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and market cap (left Y-axis).

After the launch of Synthetix v2, the protocol had a relatively low market cap & high P/S ratio --> revenues were low initially, but have trended upward during the past quarter.
15/ Synthetix’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and daily total revenue (left Y-axis).

Synthetix’s daily revenues have been been on an upward trend during Q3-Q4, after a slower start in Q2.
16/ Ethereum’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and market cap (left Y-axis).

Market cap of Ethereum is a long way from the highs of 2017, yet its P/S ratio is on par with leading DeFi protocols --> significant growth in revenues during the past 6 months.
17/ Ethereum’s historical price to sales (P/S) ratio (right Y-axis) and daily total revenue (left Y-axis).

Ethereum’s daily revenues have been consistently high during Q2-Q4, while its market cap has yet to catch-up with the growth of the Ethereum ecosystem.
18/ The performance of Token Terminal’s price to sales ratio-weighted index.

It’s one of the first fundamentals-based indexes in the crypto market.

Source: terminal.tokenterminal.com/dashboard/tti
19/ The historical composition of the TTI index.

It shows that Compound, Uniswap, and MakerDAO currently hold the largest weightings in the index portfolio.
20/ We recently posted a proposal for the TTI to be included in the @indexcoop product offering — you can view the proposal here:

gov.indexcoop.com/t/token-termin…
fin/ Check out our newsletter for more DeFi-related insights:

tokenterminal.substack.com/p/the-price-to…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Token Terminal

Token Terminal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tokenterminal

27 Nov
1/ After a few months of building, it's time for us to reveal the first version of the Terminal:

terminal.tokenterminal.com

A thread 👇
2/ Our long-term goal is to work together with our users  – the project teams and communities, investors, analysts, and other stakeholders  – to build out the most robust and useful investment analysis toolkit for the crypto markets.
3/ "Launched in 1982, long before PCs and the Internet became ubiquitous, the Bloomberg Terminal brought transparency to financial markets. It connected market participants to groundbreaking data, analytics, and information-delivery service   and revolutionized an industry."
Read 23 tweets
2 Oct
The return of @MakerDAO.

A monster thread 👇
1. MakerDAO’s market cap is below the DeFi average (calculated based on all L2 projects listed on Token Terminal). Image
2. MakerDAO’s market cap was more resilient than DeFi projects in general post the ICO craze. Image
Read 28 tweets
11 Sep
A short thread on DeFi through the lens of traditional marketplace metrics 👇📊

1. Gross merchandise volume (GMV)
2. Take rate
3. Revenue (total fees paid)
4. Price to sales ratio (P/S)

*GMV and Revenue figures are both annualized (calculated based on a 30-day moving average).
1. Gross merchandise volume (GMV)

What is the total dollar value flowing through the protocol? Image
2. Take rate

What is the (fixed or weighted avg.) fee rate that the protocol charges on its GMV? Image
Read 6 tweets
3 Sep
1/ Time for some charts! 📊📈

Check out how @MakerDAO compares against other DeFi projects listed on Token Terminal. 👇
2/ For MakerDAO, the revenue comes from interest paid on DAI borrows:

- GMV (outstanding borrows)
- Take Rate (weighted avg. interest rate)
- Revenue (GMV * Take Rate = total interest paid)

3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
2 Sep
1/ Time for some charts! 📈📊

Check out how @BalancerLabs maps against other DeFi projects listed on Token Terminal. 👇
2/
3/
Read 12 tweets
23 Aug
1/ Some quick comments, just so everyone knows we're trying to find a way to standardize this stuff 😃

We currently measure revenue as total fees paid -- since not all projects have fee splits implemented -- to make the revenue figures more comparable.
2/ Trading fee for Kyber is 0.2% = divided 70/30 between KNC holders and LPs.

Trading fee for Balancer is 0.38% (weighted avg) = divided 0/100 between BAL holders and LPs.

So, for Kyber we're not measuring just KNC holder revenues, but the total amount of fees generated.
3/ Right now, we've tried to find one methodology that would be as broadly applicable as possible.

End result: GMV * Take Rate = Revenue

As the crypto space matures, we'll be able to segment projects a lot better based on different factors.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!