We've gotten a lot of feedback on this piece. Some is in bad faith, but some is legit and from researchers and journalists I respect, so let me answer a few concerns. 1/?
(I don't feed trolls. And I ignore government bots. But if you have constructive thoughts, reply away, I'll leave it open)
Q) A lot is going on in the conflict, why is your report so short?

Because it's not a report, it's a press release. Our reports, like this recent one on Yezidi kids, is 64 pages. Our output on the NK execution vids is less than 1000 words. amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
We do short press releases when something significant happens in a conflict and we think timely reporting and verifying and doing a legal analysis will be helpful. Long reports take months, these short pieces take days.
We do these in lots of conflicts. Like the recent massacre in Mai-Kadra: amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
Or when the battle lines shifted suddenly in Libya and Russian mercenaries were laying landmines in civilian neighborhoods on the way out: amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
Or of torture and executions in Mozambique: amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
Or in this conflict in NK, when Azerbaijan used banned cluster munitions against Stepanakert on 4 Oct: amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
Or when Armenian forces used cluster munitions on Barda later that same month. amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
We quickly published this latest piece because the two videos of decapitations of civilians by Azerbaijani forces were so disgusting and egregious we wanted to verify them and demand an investigation and prosecution of these war crimes as quickly as we could.
But this output was not our final word on the conflict. Far from it. We're still monitoring and researching, because, as the latest ceasefire violation shows, the conflict isn't even over yet.
Q) There are hundreds of NK videos, why did you only cover 22? How did you miss the others?

We know there are tons of videos. We're on telegram too. But watching videos and researching whether they are legit are two different things.
Every day we find old or mis-attributed videos that are supposedly from this or that conflict and turn out to be wrong. Some are government propaganda. Some are mistakes. Some, who knows? Remember this one supposedly from NK? observers.france24.com/en/20201106-vi…
Just today there is another that may or may not be right.
The point is, we do a lot of work to verify. Geolocate if we can, of course. Finding old versions of the videos. Digital forensic analysis of whether the file has been altered in some way. Pathologist analysis of the wounds of victims. Weapons, uniforms, languages, etc.
That takes time, and there are hundreds of videos just from NK, so we can't do them all. Some we work on and can't prove so we never publish. Some other outlets do first and then I try to amplify their work: bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-w…
The truthful, un-glamorous reason wrote about these 22 videos is because they are the ones we had done and we didn't want to wait and stay silent until we had finished 222 video analyses, not when war crimes appear to be ongoing. Which leads to the final issue...
Q) Why are you acting like all these crimes are "the same?"

Here I want to be extremely clear. We do no such thing. In the output we spend 500 words on the three horrific executions and 50 words on the other crimes. The nature of the violence demanded it.
But human rights orgs are not in the business of keeping score & counting violations to determine which side is "better" or "worse." We are on no one's side, except the side of victims and the law. We will always disappoint partisans. This comes up a lot:
If both sides are committing war crimes, we won't pretend otherwise. And if there are hundreds of videos of human rights violations, we're going to write about all we can prove. That's it. We publish what we can prove. And then work as hard as we can for justice. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brian Castner

Brian Castner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Brian_Castner

16 Dec
Important investigation here on the strike on the Shushi cathedral in October. The ordnance scraps collected at the scene remain a bit of a mystery, but to me they point to IAI (Israel Aerospace Industries) as the likely manufacturer. (photos in thread below)
There are photos in the HRW report that show a March 2019 manufacture date. They also show this same basic data plate pattern.
The font (particularly the "AO" and "0"), the data plate layout, the basic design, etc are all similar to other IAI products. For example, this Mikholit missile (this one labeled in Hebrew, because used domestically - Israel uses English in their exports). Image
Read 4 tweets
27 Nov
Interesting use of web design here to explain this painting. But the pieces misidentifies the man in green, who is (my opinion) the key to it. I wrote about him in my book DISAPPOINTMENT RIVER. Warraghiyagey, the bridge between whites and the Iroquois. 1/ nytimes.com/interactive/20…
"Warraghiyagey" was Sir William Johnson, named by the Mohawk as "One Who Does Much." In the painting, he is the only main figure doing anything, running into the scene while everyone else sits and watches General Wolfe die.
Johnson was a British aristocrat who created a fur trading empire in the Mohawk Valley of upstate New York in the mid-1700s by partnering with Hendrick, the Mohawk chief.
Read 8 tweets
16 Dec 19
On my run today, listening to @Tmgneff on this podcast, I thought about the various discussions I've been having with veterans since the Afghanistan Papers story came out.

I realized I had been conflating two things: was this wrong, and was this news? (1/?-book list to follow)
I realized I have almost skipped past the wrongness, long ago having become accustomed to the official dissembling, what @AdrianBonenber1 calls "the absurdity and cravenness of this chartified process." It makes me angry, but it no longer surprises. newrepublic.com/article/155918…
So it is surely wrong for the gov't to lie & mislead for decades. But is it news? This is the part I had focused on, and on this score, I stand firm. Anyone paying attention (everyone should be) knew the US military has been disingenuous since...well, let's say the post-WWII era.
Read 11 tweets
31 Oct 19
Over the last week, protesters in Baghdad have died with some absolutely gruesome injuries. Every doc we talked to said it's trauma like they've never seen.

Here's a #thread about the new grenades being used, and why they are so deadly. amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
Listen, there are videos out there of these horrific injuries at the moment of impact. Do yourself a favor and don't watch them - your sleep will thank you. The CT scans from hospital afterward are bad enough, as you can see.
Why such awful trauma? Less-lethal weapons can always kill when used incorrectly, and police should never fire grenades directly at people. But this is a new level of damage. Not only are Iraqi security forces firing at point blank range, they are using a heavier kind of grenade.
Read 11 tweets
22 Oct 19
In August we went to Tripoli to do post-blast investigations on civilian casualties. Full @amnesty report & cool interactive map at the link.

But for #osint & #weapons twitter here's a long #thread on what exactly we pulled out of the craters & bomb dumps amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
We made it to 33 strikes, on both sides of the front line: Tarhouna, Qasr Bin Ghashir, Wadi al-Rabie, al-Swani, etc. Some of the craters were a month old. Others, like a slaughterhouse hit on Eid, were just struck that day. I managed to pull fresh frag out of nearly every spot
Not surprisingly, old inaccurate Gaddafi-era rockets and artillery caused the majority of civilian casualties. But we saw A LOT of Blue Arrow 7 strikes - in the vacated buffer along the front lines, lots of cheap burned out technicals hit by v. expensive guided missiles.
Read 17 tweets
1 Oct 19
Today we are releasing a new investigation into an American airstrike that caused civilian casualties in Somalia.

With so much Trump impeachment news to keep up on, why should you spare a moment on 3 dead farmers in Somalia?

Give me a shot in this #thread to answer that.
First, the facts: on 18 March 2019, the US launched an airstrike against 3 men driving in a Toyota SUV on their way back to Mogadishu. Everyone agrees on that.

@USAfricaCommand says they killed 3 "terrorists."

We say they don't know who they killed. amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
This word "terrorist" is important. After 18 years of war, it no longer means what you think it means.

The US isn't talking about operatives planning international attacks. AFRICOM told us they hit "lower level al-Shabaab" or "affiliates" ahead of a ground operation.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!