Q: How is it that America finds itself ripped apart by postmodernism (i.e. subjectivism / post-truth era), yet East Asia remains sanely grounded in reality?
Background: public intellectuals in the West have been addressing postmodernism (Stephen Hicks, Jordan Peterson, James Lindsay, etc), yet they find themselves going over the same tired old philosophic ground and not really getting to root cause. /2
Apparently it hasn’t yet occurred to them that Western thinking might not be able to solve this Western problem, if it was that thinking itself which created the problem. 💡/3
What I’ve again and again suggested, to deaf ears, is to look outside their Anglosphere bubble (look at exactly what they have, since Kant’s racist remark that only white people can do philosophy, rejected)... /4
A: Look at Laozi’s book which first establishes that reality is real; nature exists and we are products of it. Then came the Confucian rectification of names; words should reflect actualities (reality/nature). Read Analects; respectful rituals, shame is a virtue. /5
Look at the five relations (a culture to strengthen the primate natural order that binds us). Look at the Great Learning for the order of events (from family unit order, comes society/govt order).
On and on it goes with advices for establishing and keeping order; long life. /6
How could chaos ever take hold—subjectivists, is/ought stupidity, word nonsense, shameless liars, selfish individuals destroying society—so long as these hold?
Thus Chinese philosophy guards East Asia against the road to madness—liberalism, neoliberalism, then postmodernism. /7
What’s so impressive, and useful, about Chinese philosophy is “this tends to lead to that.” Fundamental principles, probabilities, that drive time series events.
This aids our decision making—if we don’t want “that” N-years later, don’t do “this” now. 💡 /8
And correct theories have predictive power...
The ancients theorized that if a society were ever so foolish as to do these things they cautioned against, that it would end up exactly where America is today.
Now, their theories validated!! 👍 /9
The task the West faces this century is a messy philosophical revolution—this last 300 years of exclusionary Anglosphere authored/curated truth has now been tried and reached the predicted end. /10
Many ideas are outright false (“universal values”), dangerously short-sighted (neoliberalism/corporatism), or just plain weird (is/ought).
Retrace steps, find errors. /11
In this difficult task, there’s really no better reference than ancient Chinese philosophy.
Just as China had to look into Western philosophy last century to see what it missed, the West will have to look into Eastern.
But for now—denial, bigotry, and obstinance continue. 12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is it—the core social problem of the Anglosphere this century—there is a deep cultural attitude in the colonies, who still see themselves as superior rulers of the world.
On the topic of American democracy being fake, let’s try to remove our minds from decades of state/corporate propaganda and think objectively for a moment...
• DIRECT DEMOCRACY: The U.S. is *not* a direct democracy—at the federal level the people do not get a direct vote on the actions of the state. And at the local level, any choices that do appear are quite limited and rigged. 2/18
• REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY: The U.S. is *not* a representative democracy either—the “representatives” are not the people's, they are the representatives of corporations and entrenched state organizations. These institutions have a bigger carrot/stick than voters. 3/18
2/ The Western left/right love to conflate these...
The far left treat China as their holy grail of leftism, while the Breitbart goons decry "leftist China."
But China is NOT the West, and does not map to Western thought (ideologies).
3/ Conservatism, pragmatism, and a deep grounding in reality is foundational to the Chinese thought lineage beginning w/ the Dao De Jing. It then becomes hyper-pragmatic, hundreds of years later, with Han Fei's Legalism.
This contrasts starkly with idealistic Western leftism...
The American “social justice” cancel cult operates outside the law with trial-by-media.
But it’s not even a trial, because only one side is “allowed” to argue their case! If you do anyhow, you are “supporting XYZ alleged crime,” which obviously begs the question.
2/ Begging the question, for those who don’t know, is a logical fallacy in which an argument assumes its own conclusion (circular reasoning).
But postmodernism actually denies that reason is real!! It’s “a tool of the oppressor,” “everything is subjective,” etc. #CrazyTown
3/ Putting this all together...
We now have a Western cult that is obsessed with “identity” (race/gender), operates outside of the law, is authoritarian allowing no other viewpoints, and flat out denies reason/reality as being real.
Mengzi (孟子 pronounced “Mung-za”), aka Mencius, was born 372 BC, 180 years after Confucius. What was his point, and contribution to Confucianism? After going thru his writings for the last month here are my thoughts… #Mengzi#Mencius#Confucianism
2/ On the problem of ordering society, to avoid barbarism and collapses—Confucius pioneered the pragmatic system of 1) regular social rituals with proper form (禮), and 2) cultivation of one's humanity (仁). Confucius was mostly silent on humans’ core nature (important).
3/ So what did Mengzi add to Confucianism which was not already there? Not so much, yet something…
Mengzi made one big claim; that human nature is originally “good.” He also provided evidence for this claim. In this way he's seen as an idealist, yet orthodox, Confucianist.