Would be interesting to see the child's perspective here, because of nothing else there are many signs that the author is not a very reliable narrator
https://twitter.com/michaelkoziol/status/1337887946897203200
For example, the author says they are totally accepting but look at the language here
Both a bit offensive and some definite red flags
Both a bit offensive and some definite red flags
The author claims to want to support their child in making the right decision for themselves, but given that the child apparently identifies as a trans boy, but they've consistently identified them as a cis girl, it seems clear what decision the author considers the best choice
This is, of course, aside from the other issues with sharing this piece, but I suspect that if the @smh had done the barest of due diligence they would've found that there is more than one side to this story @michaelkoziol
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
