The Snowflakes were contrasted with he 'Claybanks' (based on the color of the local clay) who wanted a gradual transition out of slavery for slaves, & the 'Charcoals'/'Brown Radicals', who wanted immediate emancipation for black people.
And did you know that #woke became a byword for social awareness in 2008, with Erykah Badu’s song “Master Teacher”?
'Stay woke' became used in parts of the black community for those who were self-aware, who questioned the dominant paradigm, & who strived for something better.
#Woke was popularised in 2014, following the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, when it became entwined with #BlackLivesMatter movement; instead of just suggesting awareness of injustice or racial tension, it became a word signalling action.
Free speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions & ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction.
The term "freedom of expression" is often used synonymously.
Freedom of expression includes any act of seeking, receiving, & imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.
Freedom of expression is recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). However...
Article 19 states the exercise of these rights carry "special duties & responsibilities" & may "be subject to certain restrictions" eg "respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals".
Free speech is NOT absolute: limitations relate to libel, slander, obscenity, pornography, sedition, incitement, fighting words, classified info, copyright, trade secrets, food labeling, NDAs, the right to privacy & dignity, the right to be forgotten, public security, & perjury.
It's my contention that - contrary to what many on the Right keep misleadingly claiming about both younger people & especially people on the Left - absolutely NOBODY is "anti-free speech".
Free speech has ALWAYS existed on a continuum, & always will.
Challenging the “free speech” of pathological liars, racists, paedophiles, anti-Semites, neo-Nazis, homophobes, transphobes, Islamophobes, people who glorify terrorism & those who deliberately spread dangerously misleading disinformation, is always the correct thing to do.
Another constant refrain from those on the Right determined to fuel a divisive 'culture war' concerns "cancel culture" & "no-platforming".
'No platforming' in particular actually has a noble history, & CAN BE an ethical, legitimate, appropriate & very effective tool.
Brave & heroic individuals “no-platformed” Oswald Mosley in the 1930s, the National Front in the 1970s, the BNP in the 1980s & 1990s & Islamic extremists in the noughties.
Allow me to briefly discuss the case of Oswald Mosley, Leader of the British Union of Fascists.
While Mosley's anti-Semitic & racist politics found some success in some pockets of London, they failed spectacularly in trying to establish a foothold among the vast majority of northern working class voters.
In 1937, his followers were growing & he decided to visit parts of the country where he didn't have as much support, with the aim of converting the working classes to a new, fascist ideology.
Of course people tried to 'no platform' him, but the authorities allowed him to tour.
On October 10, Mosley arrived in the Liverpool. His plan was to stand on top of a loud speaker van & tour the city.
He got up on the van, gave the crowd a fascist salute but before he could even speak a single word, stones were thrown from the crowd & hit Mosley in the head.
In the 1930s, Mosley’s fascists were also attacked by workers, anti-fascists, socialists & communists in Devon, Manchester, Newcastle, London and Stockton.
I do not support violence, but imho, there are times when 'no-platforming' IS entirely appropriate.
"Cancel Culture" is not new either: boycotts & call-outs leading to job losses have forced positive social change across the world. Think of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, & few would think neo-Nazi groups being subject to “cancel culture” has been bad for Britain.
Finally, a brief word about 'Identity Politics': the suffragette, the abolitionist, civil & gay rights movements were ALL primarily 'identity politics' - as is challenging the exploitation of the working class by the powerful.
We need nuance, not reductionism & absolutism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Boris Johnson appears to have had a secret meeting with billionaire Peter Thiel - perhaps the most fanatical of the libertarian Oligarchs and co-founder of the controversial US data firm Palantir, the year before it was given a role at the heart of the UK’s pandemic response.
The hour-long afternoon meeting on 28 August 2019 was marked “private” in a log of Johnson’s activities that day and was not subsequently disclosed on the government’s public log of meetings.
Elon Musk has been amplifying far-right accounts again, including Tommy Robinson, Rupert Lowe, and numerous anonynmous known #disinformation superspreader accounts like 'End Wokeness'.
Let's examine the context for yesterday's march in Richard Tice's constituency, #Skegness.
After decades of neglect, Skegness (pop 20K), stands out on key socio-economic markers on national averages: residents are older; whiter; lower full-time employment; higher rates of few/no qualifications; and concentrated deprivation - it's far-more deprived than most of England.
History repeatedly teaches us that burdening already struggling communities is a recipe for disaster.
These communities have been crying out for help for DECADES, but successive UK Govts have largely ignored their pleas, and continued to increase inequality, which harms us all.
🧵 @Rylan Asylum seekers coming here aren’t technically "illegal." International law (the 1951 Refugee Convention) allows people to seek asylum in any country regardless of how they arrive or how many countries they pass through, as long as they're fleeing persecution or danger.
Allow me to explain why asylum seekers aren’t “illegal”, and how misinformation and nasty demonising and scapegoating rhetoric by certain politicians and media, including news media, has made some British people less welcoming of asylum seeekers.
@Rylan
People fleeing war, torture, or persecution have the legal right to seek asylum.
The 1951 Refugee Convention, which the UK helped write, says anyone escaping danger can apply for asylum in another country no matter how they arrive: claiming asylum isn't a crime.
Farage's illiberal, immoral, & unworkable authoritarian plan involves ripping up human rights laws forged after WWII, which protect British people, & wasting £billions of UK taxpayers' money, giving some of it to corrupt misogynistic totalitarian regimes. theguardian.com/politics/2025/…
Leaving the #ECHR, repealing the Human Rights Act and disapplying international conventions
The UK would be an outlier among European democracies, in the company of only Russia and Belarus, if it were to leave the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
Opting out of treaties such as the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, the UN Convention against torture and the Council of Europe Anti-Trafficking Convention would also be likely to do serious harm to the UK’s international reputation.
It could also undermine current return deals, including with France, and other cooperation agreements on people-smuggling with European nations such as Germany.
The Society of Labour Lawyers said the plan would “in all likelihood preclude further cooperation and law enforcement in dealing with small boats coming from the continent and so increase, rather than reduce, the numbers reaching our shores”.
Farage said he would legislate to remove the “Hardial Singh” safeguards – a reference to a legal precedent that sets limits on the Home Office’s immigration detention powers – to allow indefinite detention for immigration purposes. This would be highly vulnerable to legal challenge.
Many of the rights protected by the ECHR and the Human Rights Act are rooted in British case law, so judges would still be able to prevent deportations, even without international conventions.
Reform UK’s grotesque far-right mass deportation plan is not just economically and socially illiterate (Britain an ageing population and low birth rate) rely on striking “returns agreements” with countries including Afghanistan, Iran, Eritrea and Sudan, offering financial incentives to secure these deals, alongside visa restrictions and potential sanctions on countries that refuse.
These are countries where the Home Office’s risk reports warn of widespread torture and persecution.
It would risk the scenario of making payments to countries such as Iran, whose regime the UK government has accused of plotting terror attacks on British soil.
The Liberal Democrats called the payments “a Taliban tax”, saying the plan would entail sending billions “to an oppressive regime that British soldiers fought and died to defeat”. They said: “Not a penny of taxpayers’ money should go to a group so closely linked to terrorist organisations proscribed by the UK.”
A reminder of the one, viewed 310,000 times, for which she was jailed, which urged people to burn down asylum seeker hotels after the #Southport attack - which had nothing to do with asylum seekers.
While all these tweets of Connolly's were made before her incendiary post, they don't say which year they were posted.
They can be accessed here, via The Wayback Machine, which has archived more than 916 billion web pages.
Connolly's tweet (top right) was in response to the tweet on the left, which criticised Laurence Fox for posting an upskirt photograph of Narinder Kaur.
The next one (right centre) was Connolly asking Kaur if she had 'flashed her gash'.
Aided by the billionaire-owned UK news media (Mail, Sun, Times, Metro, TalkTV and GB "News"), populist politicians push a cynical, divisive, and dangerously irresponsible false narrative that Britain is 'lawless'.