1/ This famous GOP attorney is advising people not to volunteer as appointees of their parties to be observers for oversight of elections, but to work for money for the gov't officials, and implies that watchers don't make a difference. He's very wrong!
See thread. ⬇️
See thread. ⬇️
https://twitter.com/ElectionLawCtr/status/1339018382830612481
2/ The reason that the plaintiffs in Trump lawsuits have had to throw b.s. against the wall to see what sticks and have made so many inaccurate claims is that they had very few observers during the election processing in GA. Very few collected the evidence for their party.
3/ Vast majority of poll workers "officials" will not collect evidence for the parties. Most are too fearful of being fired and their loyalty is to their county staff boss.
Observers/watchers are advocates for their parties and candidates, and can challenge discrepancies.
Observers/watchers are advocates for their parties and candidates, and can challenge discrepancies.
4/ Observers can be quickly sent to "hot spots," while poll workers are in a stationary job and generally have a limited perspective on problems that occur.
Observers can investigate problems to some extent while poll workers don't have flexibility.
Observers can investigate problems to some extent while poll workers don't have flexibility.
5/ It depends on your personality and how you like to work. Do you like being an advocate for your party or do you prefer to perform repetitive tasks in completely non-partisan ways?
It's a more sophisticated decision than Adams's black & white command.
Volunteer!
It's a more sophisticated decision than Adams's black & white command.
Volunteer!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
