Finally someone describes this in a way that makes some sense to me, and that coherently explains why these Trump-loving people can't tell me what news sources they trust: They're not interested in the news; they're game addicts. They get their worldview and rules from the game.
At the point where the Trump/QAnon anti-masker asks me to "prove that Trump is a criminal but don't quote CNN or BBC, because they're fake news," I ask them which news sources they trust, so that I can attempt to limit myself to those; then the conversation stops.
It's like, ALL news is fake news, regardless of who reports it, unless it correlates with a message they got from the game. Game worlds have a certain internal consistency. If you willingly suspend disbelief, you accept every mythological fact presented by the game.
This Trump/QAnon game is so dangerous because it's a blended reality gamer and players carry real weapons.
Kyle Rittenhouse shot real people with a real gun in a real street.
Trump sacrificed Kurds Ukrainians, Yemenis, 300,000+ Americans and more, because this was a game. Gamers are safe behind a screen. Their emotions may be real ("You insulted me, I'll blow up your assets"), but there aren't real guys with firethrowers beyond their bedroom door.
The fun thing for the Proud Boys, QAnons and their ilk is being able to go several notches beyond Ingress and making it feel like there are real goals. Like #SaveTheChildren.
Anyone need reminding where the QAnon cult started?
It's all a GAME. Real people are dying in a GAME.
I've re-read my thread 👆 and if you caught the gist, congratulations, because I made many typing mistakes and said several things in ambiguous ways.
Be sure to read Seth's thread. Mine is just a musing; his is the real substance.
Wow, Reed Berkowitz' article was such a cathartic read for me. I now understand why, while QAnon has many traditional cult elements, it quite doesn't fit the regular cult pattern.
Meanwhile @jimstewartson has been saying Michael Flynn is in with the top guys at QAnon, and people were just moving on. Because QAnons spot too many patterns, but other people see too few?
I see (and like) that several other commentators have been referring to QAnons as "LARPers" for quite some time.
Thread about Flynn and his involvement with QAnon, which has become major media news this week (but has been going on for a long time):
"We don't trust the government. We don't trust the Congress. We don't trust the Supreme Court. We don't trust now the science. We don't trust medicine. We don't trust the media for sure," Kruglanski said.
"So who do we trust? Well, we trust our tribe. We trust conspiracy theories that tell us what we want to hear."
Just a reminder that some of these people who accuse others of abusing children have actually been abusing children themselves, for years before QAnon was invented.
When you don't have great thinking skills - like when you believe your own fallacious arguments, succumb to ill-suited cognitive biases, and never engage in metathinking - then "Think for yourself!" is no better and often no different from contracting out your thinking to others.
Ah, deep, and well illustrated. Connects QAnon to many of the characters in the Proof series by Trump's biographer @SethAbramson, and identifies Flynn as central to all this, as @jimstewartson has also done. Have to update my curatorial article now. blog.usejournal.com/qanon-is-propa…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Autistic Strategies Network - 2021: A year of increasing collaboration [THREAD]
We begin 2021 with a number of programmes and projects in the pipeline. These are some of our focus areas for the year, on the continent, in our country and in our province:
AFRICA: Autistic advocacy
We’re building relationships with autistic activists throughout Africa and with cross-disability organisations serving communities in African languages to support autistic strategies in ways that draw from the best of African values and culture.
AFRICA: Ableism
A meeting with the head of the Health Department in the Western Cape identified ableism as the single greatest obstacle to better health services for disabled people in the province.
This alarming message came through on WhatsApp this morning from Johan Pretorius of DeafBlind SA:
"With the predicted stormy weather in KZN, Mpumalanga and Limpopo please do take care. Avoid unnecessary traveling and be careful during dangerous weather conditions by staying indoors."
(Keep reading; that's not the big problem yet.)
"I am currently making enquiries with our local police about accessable emergency contact number with local police stations all over South Africa. The usual phone call number 10111 is not accessible for Deaf and DeafBlind persons."
If you're a speaking autistic person who suddenly discovered that nonspeaking autistic people have something to say, are you going to concertedly continue amplifying their words after you have used them to bolster your anti-Sia campaign, or is this just a one-time thing?
People who SAY they care about nonspeaking autistic people can't be judged merely on how much they talk about it. They can work with nonspeakers, have a nonspeaking brother, start an organisation to support parents and research etc. etc.
Why the predominant paradigm of personal achievement in the US (and the main approach to working with autistic children there) is immoral, unscientific and counterproductive.
(Long educational video. Spend this hour. It may be essential to do so.)
The USA isn't the only culprit, but Alfie Kohn focuses on the US, because they have some uniquely extreme manifestations of the problem.
He even connects it to why anti-maskers are so common and so extreme in their selfish rebelliousness in the US compared to other countries.