Stupid argument from US right-wingers who want to put down Jill Biden: "She shouldn't have Dr in front of her name because she's not a REAL doctor. She doesn't deliver babies or anything." Some history: the word "Doctor" is derived from the Latin verb "docere", which means 1/5
"To teach". A PhD, short for Philosophiae Doctor (Doctor of Philosophy), is awarded to individuals who are highly educated and have the qualifications to be outstanding teachers. Medical practitioners were not referred to as "doctors" until fairly recently. 2/5
They are more properly called "Physicians", unless they have the advanced education, beyond an MD, which makes them a PhD. A degree to practice medicine is a professional degree, but it is not a doctorate. The shift to calling physicians "doctor" in English-speaking countries 3/5
Began in the mid-18th century when medical practitioners divided into specializations. Some would be surgeon-apothecaries (i.e. pharmacists, which did not require a university degree) and these would be called "Mr", and others went to university to study medicine and 4/5
Adopted the title of "Dr" to differentiate themselves from those who were less educated practitioners. People with PhDs are REAL doctors. MDs are physicians. It's not a contest, both are important. But it's very ignorant to attack
PhDs this way. Here endeth the lecture. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ahem. I have some things to say that may come as news to a lot of Canadians. Pay attention. There is a test. It's called "Life". 1. Canada is a sovereign nation. We are not part of the United States.
1/? #cdnpoli
2. We have different laws in Canada. For example, we do NOT have the right to bear arms. That is American. Gun ownership in Canada is a privilege and subject to reasonable restrictions. You know, so we don't go around killing each other. 2/?
3. In Canada we have Freedom of Expression, not Free Speech. There is a difference. Your freedom of expression ends where what you are expressing may hurt or endanger others. There are consequences for hate speech, for example. 3/?
There is a narrative, incorrect but not uncommon, that says a) First Nations came over the Bering Strait, therefore, have no claims on land, & b) residential schools weren't all that bad, therefore First Nations deserve no special treatment. It is greed speaking here. 1/10
It is a travesty that the treaty relationships were not taught in our schools. This has allowed the belief to grow that the government just gives First Nations people money and they are a drain on the system, and even that our taxes could be lower if we could just get them 2/10
Off reliance on the government. That isn't how it works. Treaties were made. Contracts signed. Effectively, we are paying rent for the use of the land (to put it in the most basic of terms). People who understand this try to undermine it by claiming First Nations are... 3/10
People in other provinces might not know, but the new curriculum recommendations from Kenney's hand-picked advisors indicate there will be no mention of residential schools before jr high, if then. This is not just O'Toole, this is official conservative policy. 1/4 #ResignOToole
This argument that "Alberta has fossil fuel gunk in the ground so we have to dig it up and ship it out" is weird. It's like saying you have to keep eating a cake even after you start to feel sick and are having regrets... Because there's still cake... 1/6
It's like saying "you've spent an hour at this party and you're having a bad time, but you have to stay until the end because the party is going on..." 2/6
It's like saying "we haven't caught all the fish in the sea yet, so we have to keep fishing. We have to build more, bigger boats and huger drag nets, we have to grow and expand until there is no life in the oceans...." 3/6
Conservatives like to talk about "corruption". A lot. But do they mean the same thing most people mean by the word? I think many people would consider a political party doing something that does not benefit the people, but rewards their friends as corruption. 1/22 #cdnpoli
Say, for example, a Minister of the Crown who passes legislation liable to directly benefit a family member or themself, to the detriment of the public good. That seems like corruption. pressprogress.ca/albertas-healt…
2/22
Or a government that invents panels & advisory positions for friends & donors & arranges for these panels and advisors to return reports and recommendations that mirror what the governing party wants to do, but with the guise of "research" and "impartiality". Seems corrupt.
3/22
In 1955, the US Supreme Court issued its second Brown v. Board of Education ruling. They called for dismantling of segregation in public schools, across the US, "with all deliberate speed". #cndpoli
Now, some people in Virginia, including the president of the University of Virginia, Colgate Whitehead Darden Jr, were appalled by this. They felt it seriously over-reached into "states' rights".
Any state, they felt, should be able to discriminate against any people they felt were inferior, because of race, religion, gender, or whatever damn thing they chose. They saw it as a deliberate attack on the cherished values and way of life of southern Americans.