I am extraordinarily confused by the number of non-PhD-havers in certain media outlets who proclaim with absolute certainty that among the PhD-having-intelligentsia, using the title 'Dr.' for PhDs (and Ed.Ds) is somehow gauche.

It's not, that's stupid. 1/8
Look - do academics go around the office calling their colleagues 'Dr. so-and-so'? No, because this isn't a Jane Austen novel (if only because we're not that witty) and we don't say Mr. or Ms. in casual conversation either. 2/8
But when writing a formal letter, or a cold email, or introducing someone's talk or any other situation where you'd use 'Mr.' or 'Ms.' we absolutely use Dr. for PhD-havers (and EdD-havers!).

It is not gauche, it is normal and failing to do so is a bit of a faux pas. 3/8
And let's not play pretend here - as a balding white guy, I am taken seriously regardless of my achievements or credentials because I look the part.

Many female scholars and scholars of color far more accomplished than I are not offered that benefit of the doubt. 4/8
And to be clear, that's not just a vague sense of the matter - it's actually been studied in a careful, rigorous way: liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.10…

I have seen *far* better academics than me get 'Ms.'-ed at on this very birdsite in cases where i would *never* have been 'Mr'-ed. 5/8
And of course we ought to note that the idea that Dr. should be reserved for medical doctors is dumb, that the title was the province of academic educators (indicating qualifications to teach at a university) first and extended to medical doctors only later. 6/8
And yes, an Ed.D does count! (professional doctorates also mostly get Dr.; JDs are the traditional exception and I bow to the practice in the field. Lawyers may present briefs on the JD on the 12th of Never. Honorary doctorates in any field generally do not count). 7/8
Finally, I hear anyone talking s*** about someone's dissertation who hasn't written one, I will slap them with my diss. - it is 788 overwritten pages and in hardcover for the purpose.

Talking s*** about state school degrees will also earn diss-slaps.

So ends the lesson. 8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bret Devereaux

Bret Devereaux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BretDevereaux

8 Dec
My own take for why this is a problem has to do less with the abilities of any particular SecDef or fears about the increasing politicization of the military and more to do with long-term norms about control and direction. 1/14
There is a trap and it is relatively easy to slide into where the normative assumption (among the public and elites) is that civilian leaders ought not interfere with military leaders due to the latter's superior expertise. 2/14
That risk is particularly acute in a society which generally assigns high moral qualities to service personnel and low moral qualities to politicians (as we do). There is already a lot of 'if only the politicians would let the generals do the job' popular discourse. 3/14
Read 14 tweets
5 Dec
It's time for a long twitter thread on the nature and limits of the evidence for the ancient world!

As you may be aware, compared to even something like the European Middle Ages (much less the modern period) the evidence for the ancient world is really very limited!

1/lots
Because the evidence for the ancient world is so limited, it is often necessary when writing narrative histories for regular people to scaffold around known facts to fill in some of the blanks.

Obviously this has risks and good scholars signal when they are doing it. 2/xx
But a lot of times, when you don't know the evidence, the difference between the fact-supported pillar and the guess-work-supported lintel isn't clear, especially if the lintel is the point of the argument and thus directly asserted as the conclusion of the pillars. 3/
Read 53 tweets
25 Nov
Ancient Near Eastern forms of monarchy getting oversimplified every freakin' time: Image
No one:

Absolutely no one:

That One Student: "Oh, people back then thought all of the kings were living gods so they had UNLIMITED POWER!"

Me: Sigh. Let's start back at the beginning...
Even including Egypt, most ANE kings did not have pretensions of divinity. Especially - say it with me now -

👏 Achaemenid👏 Great👏 Kings👏 Weren't 👏Living 👏Gods. 👏

And yes, I literally have my in-person classes chant that back to me to make the point.
Read 4 tweets
24 Nov
So I was listening to the latest Weeds podcast (megaphone.link/VMP2273454623) on Biden's foreign policy with @mattyglesias and @EmmaMAshford ; there's a lot of good stuff there, but I had a bit of a quibble with it, particularly re: peer competition with China 1/18
My quibble is mostly given that the Weeds presents these segments functionally as 'explainers' rather than as more directly persuasive, argumentative pieces. They are supposed to give people a sense of the state of Biden's policy and perhaps the state of the debate. 2/18
Because I don't know that this does that. @EmmaMAshford presents the shift to great power competition with China as a situation where we have asked 'how' (and answered, 'build ships') before we have asked 'why' and if we should even have competition at all. 3/18
Read 18 tweets
25 Oct
A touch smarter observation would be to note that every use of a Palantir in the story is deceptive or manipulative, at least to one party.
Aragorn deceives Sauron into believing he had the one ring, when he didn't...
Pippin is observed by Sauron, which misleads him as to the true location of the ring.

Denethor is shown the great strength of Mordor, which was true, but also incomplete information: it made him despair of any hope when clearly there was still hope given that Gondor survives.
And in perhaps the most complicated set, Sauron manipulates Saruman, corrupting and dominating him through the Palantir, while Saruman at the same time deceives Sauron, pretending to be his faithful servant while still scheming against him.
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
I remain deeply confused by reports of professors demanding that students have their cameras on during zoom classes, especially zoom lectures.

What's the purpose of making the demand for all of the students? Seems likely to create issues and in some cases rather petty?
Now, I asked my students, if they felt comfortable, to turn their cameras on during lectures, specifically because it helps me if I can see even just a few faces to gauge if there is understanding or confusion.

I made clear that there would be no grade or judgement for this.
And I've had enough students do it that I can get a little 9x9 grid of faces, which works. Not as well as in-person, but it works.

And that's all its for (well, that and for the occasional student-pet cameo). But 'requiring' it from everyone is just never going to work...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!