Thread by @CountDankulaTV

I did that.

1. Sheriff court of appeals rejected us based on emotion, then threatened to arrest my lawyer for literally doing his job.

2. High court of appeals rejected it as since I was not judged in a high court they couldnt take it.

https://twitter.com/corrupt_referee/status/1339997609650479106

3. Supreme court rejected my application saying it was "incompetent and without merit" and gave absolutely no further information or arguments to clarify what parts were incompetent or without merit.

Legal team have never seen anything like it before in their whole careers.

4. Went to the European Court of Human Rights, and I havent went public with this yet as I want more information. But that one was also rejected based on a technicality.

Basically we had to file within X time of our last appeal from a British institution.

We thought this would mean the supreme court which was within the time limit.

But as we never officially got accepted for an appeal there, just an outright rejection, that one doesn't actually count. So the last official one in their eyes was the Sheriff appeals court.

Which was outwith the time limit, so basically it has been rejected as not "filed in time".

We even hired a guy who previously worked at the ECHR for 10 years to file the report for us to ensure success.

But they still nailed us on a technicality.

This is just the gist of what happened, I haven't made a full proper public statement on this yet because I want as much information as possible before I do, Covid and lockdown is delaying that though, even worse when it's a totally backed up system.

Once I have a lot more information I will make a video talking about it. Don't want to do it too early without all the facts.

One thing it's very important to note, a thing that the legal defence community want abolished, is the sheriff court of appeals.

Basically the way it worked before, is if you got convicted in any court, you could take it to the HIGH court of appeals.

And if that failed, you could then take it to the supreme court. That was the process for many years.

But now, you only get that if you are judged in high court, if judged there, you can go to the high court of appeals, then onto the supreme court.

But the system now is, if you get judged in a sheriff court, you ONLY have the sheriff court of appeals. And the general consensus among the defence community is that it is completely bogus, as the reasons they can create for rejecting appeals can be pretty much anything.

They are not held to the same parameters as the high or supreme courts, they have a lot more freedom to wipe their arses with appeals. My case was judged in a sheriff court.

This means that all cases now judged in sheriff courts have next to no chance of appeal.

Sheriff courts judge everything from shoplifting, to on some rare occasions, murder.

You could be wrongfully convicted of something and handed a life sentence and have absolutely no chance of getting to the high or supreme court.

Defence lawyers want this new system abolished.