This is postcolonial theory for southern white people. This is literally the exact logic that Franz Fanon uses in black skin white masks to explain the plight of African Americans after the end of slavery...
Replace the word *conquer* with the word *enslave* and this is something Franz Fanon could have written:
"On the cultural front, how much of that caving is due to being an *enslaved* people conditioned into accepting imposed guilt and living with the memory of the *enslaving*?"
The *reasoning* here is bad. The *reasoning* is the problem.
Arguing that society conditioned southerners to fold by invoking the memory of losing the civil war is pretty much arguing that the south suffers from "internalized oppression."
It's the same logic. It's cashed out differently, but it still argues conservative political losses are due to southerners being conditioned by their oppressors (the north) to accept the guilt and shame of being conqueres and then to spinelessly cave.
Internalized oppression....
According to Robin Diangelo is: "Internalizing and acting out (often unintentionally) the constant messages that you and your group are inferior to the dominant group and thus deserving of your lower position"
This is the same damn thing:
We can't do this people. It's bad reasoning and it opens the door to all kinds of absolute nonsense.
You can't fight wokeness with wokeness
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Check out this linguistic sleight of hand:
Kendi interchanges "equal" and "equitable" in his tweet. By associating "equity" with "equality" (similar words, different meanings) and using "equality" to try and justify "equity" he creates the illusion people are against *equality*
1/ The woke are trying to politicize the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine.
There is no other way to say this: if they succeed people *WILL* die.
A thread🧵
2/ According to both "The Lancet", a well respected scientific journal, and the Center for Evidence Based Medicine, the group most likely to die from COVID-19 is the elderly.
It isn't even close.
By every metric Seniors are the people who are most likely to die from COVID.
3/ This is not new information. The fact that COVID targets the elderly has been known since March.Anthony Fauci even said so in the New England Journal of Medicine.
So the medical community knows this. They know the people most likely to die from COVID are Seniors.
@RadioFreeTom@rkylesmith@ConceptualJames 1/
If you think my views are about social envy I suggest you read "The Critical Turn in Education" by Isaac Gottesman. He lays out, Approvingly, the way in which education theory has come to be dominated by a blend postmodernsim and critical theory. I think this is bad.
@RadioFreeTom@rkylesmith@ConceptualJames 2/
I also spent 8 years getting 2 degrees, so while social envy is a candidate for explaining my motives, I see my concern as grounded in things as the most cited scholar in education being Paulo Friere, who is cited more then Richard Dawkins and Charles Darwin combined:
@RadioFreeTom@rkylesmith@ConceptualJames 3/
If you want to see some of what Henry Giroux (120K Citations) has to say here he is arguing in "Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education" that reason and objectivity are mere forms of social power. Again, I think this is very bad.
Imagine letting old people die because they're the wrong skin color and you want to rectify a historical injustice.
Now imagine being a doctor and actively advocating for that.
She suggests we should consider allocating healthcare resources using a *lottery.*
Allocating life saving resources using a lottery) is deeply irresponsible. The numbers clearly show the elderly are the most vulnerable, they should be vaccinated first after front-line workers.
Historical injustices are bad, but trying to rectify an inequality through a lottery is absurd. Resource allocation via lottery may mean healthy people in a vulnerable community may be vaccinated before elderly people in that same community. That makes things worse, not better.
1/ A huge mistake people make is to think of postmodernism, post-structuralism, intersectionality, Critical Legal Studies, Critical Race Theory, 4th wave feminism, and Critical Theory as being separate and distinct, having nothing to do with each other
This is a massive mistake.
2/ These disciplines are connected. They are not like individual academic factories producing different theories. The fact is that the ideas that are produced in various disciplines cross-pollinate and influence each other. The theorists make use of and share each others ideas.
3/ These fields are akin to ingredients used by activists to make the stew of Critical Social Justice.
Mix some postmodernism here with some intersectionality there, add Critical Race Theory and 4th wave feminist post-structuralism and *taste test* YUMMY...Social Justice!👨🍳
1/ This is exactly what @jordanbpeterson addresses when he talks about "the call to adventure" and "fighting off dragons." and the entire elite class has opted ignore him, laugh, and hand the culture to people who want to 'deconstruct masculinity" in the name of "social Justice."
2/ Then, when in the most predictable way possible it goes wrong in all the ways you might expect it to, people laugh, antagonize, mock and pile on.
They laugh, make fun, point fingers, and then put fourth a buffet of things that don't work. They offer no compelling answers...
3/ Stating "personal responsibility" while still continuing to advocate a combination of crass libertarianism and zombie Reaganism that leaves people without a direction or any sort of guidance is going to fail, and it is going to be laughed at.