If you want to improve safeguarding and social care training, stop letting people with zero knowledge or qualifications in neuroscience and neuropsychology teach anything about the brain to professionals. The stuff I see terrifies me - some of it is hilariously wrong.
I studied neuropsychology, but didn’t specialise in it (it was originally what I wanted to do instead of forensic). But even I don’t offer training about the brain or neuroscience, and I always call my best friend (neuroscientist, PhD) and check my thinking or theories with her.
This often results in us both literally laughing and/or shaking our heads at training courses, speeches and videos for everyone from CPS to local authorities about the brain, trauma and neuroscience.
Please check the trainer is an actual professional in neuroscience/psychology.
For them to be teaching about neuropsychology or related topics, whether you like it or not, you need to be sourcing training from academics with doctorates in that area. Don’t rely on pop psychology for something so important, and so complex.
I once went to a speech by a well known person who delivers on ‘trauma and the brain’ and it was honestly the biggest bunch of shit I had ever heard, not one bit of it was right. I thought I was going bonkers. I rang my friend and talked it through I sure enough, it was bollocks
Yet, in a room of hundreds of police, social workers, teachers etc. No one in that room knew that what they were being taught was totally confused, recycled stuff the person had probably read somewhere and then tried to teach. Who would have known? The commissioners wouldn’t.
I met some professionals working in CSE a year ago who directly told me that they had been taught
‘There’s a part of the brain at the top of the head (points to head) where the abuser controls the children, like a microchip’
I literally nearly spat my drink out.
Watched a talk in which a keynote speaker claimed that there was
‘No executive functioning when children are in trauma, and they only use their ‘reptilian brain’, with no cortical processing’
I don’t even know where to start with how totally wrong and impossible that is.
I’ve seen SO many bad explanations of how the brain responds to crisis and trauma, in which it apparently completely skips any form of executive functioning. It’s just impossible. That’s impossible.
I’ve been in the room where trainers have blamed children for being sexually abused and exploited by saying
‘The teenage brain is addicted to risk taking, it’s like heroin. They need the risk and the endorphin release, so they make risky choices which lead to them being raped’
I’ve had to spend so much time undoing bad safeguarding training in local authorities and police forces all over the UK because some cowboy trainers have come in, lied about their expertise, gift of the gab, and then trained hundreds of people in total bullshit about brains.
Some professionals in UK have been trained that children who have been abused will have permanent damage to their brains and cognitive processing and that they will basically never recover.
I’ve also come across training to social workers which says that children are ‘hard wired’ to respond to rape and abuse in certain ways - and that they have no executive functioning at all. Don’t even get me started on the ‘hard wired’ bullshit.
The thing is, when you challenge this stuff, people look at you like you’re wrong. Because they are so used to being fed this ultra easy watered down shitty brain science around trauma that when you explain reality to them, they sort of look at you like you’re a dickhead
People don’t like you saying
‘Well actually, studies around that are tiny samples, non-generalisable findings, very young topic area and we can’t really apply any of those findings to practice’
Cos, that doesn’t give them a neat tidy answer does it?
There’s also seemingly zero awareness in any of these ‘trainers’ about the counter evidence to pretty much everything they teach. But of course they aren’t aware, because they don’t actually know the topic area.
Most of what they teach are debunked neuromyths
Anyway, better end this impromptu thread by saying
- check your trainer actually has qualifications in what they are training
- remain critical of any training that dumbs down neuroscience
- red flag as soon as someone says ‘reptilian brain’ ‘hard wired’ or ‘teen brain’
Huge red flag if the trainer says that trauma responses are ‘hard wired’ or ‘skip’ cortical functioning or executive functioning.
Huge red flag if trainer starts generalising about ‘teenage brains’ - and then uses it to blame teenagers for pretty much anything
Red flag if the trainer at any point uses their fist to ‘show’ you the brain and then claims their thumb is the ‘reptilian’ brain and that the victim of abuse/trauma doesn’t use the rest of their hand ‘brain’
Ultimate red flag if trainer claims that ‘memories’ are ‘stored’ in different sections of the brain like a fuckin filing cabinet lmfao
Stop giving front line professionals shit training.
That’s my like take-home from this thread.
Stop underestimating their intelligence and capacity for complex topics and stop paying chancers ££££ for terrible training
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This might actually be the sickest thing I’ve ever seen on the internet and I have seen some sick shit.
I won’t say what I’m thinking cos I’ll get banned off this platform
CONTENT WARNING
Misogyny is still the most ignored form of hatred.
We are so behind in acknowledging, believing or tackling misogyny. We will never get to a place where we can change the world & make it safer for women and girls until we discuss misogyny like we do all other forms of hatred.
Misogyny is so belittled and ignored that, as a form of hatred and oppression, most people claim it doesn’t even exist.
That’s where we’re at with misogyny at the moment. The reason we can’t tackle it is because it’s not even acknowledged as real in some places
From what I can gather from family court hearings, the advice is
‘Always believe children when they disclose abuse, except for when they are in family court when it’s obviously some sort of parental alienation plot by mum. The abuse never happened and the kid is lying.’
🤬🤬
I just don’t get it.
Professionals being told to ignore disclosures of abuse by family court judges and writing that any further disclosures of abuse must be treated as lies to defame the dad. Reports stating the the child should apologise to dad for ‘lying about abuse’.
This goes against every single bit of safeguarding legislation we have
Just saw a Black woman post up that she is the first Black person to be employed by a psychology dept at a UK uni. She’s obviously thrilled with her appointment but I’m just horrified that in 2020 we are still hearing of these ‘firsts’ for Black academics. Shameful racism.
It’s hard to ‘like’ something like that too, because you just know she’s going into an all white department where it’s not going to be easy for her at all, which is clearly steeped in racism hence they have never employed anyone Black before now
I hope she isn’t alone for too long. I have seen depts like that and the racism is so blatantly obvious. I cannot imagine what that is like. The mixture of joy of being appointed, and fear of knowing you’re going into a department as the first and only Black person there.
We need to stop using ‘mental illness’ as a reason for abusive & criminal behaviours.
People like that are not ‘mentally ill’ - they made an active choice to do something horrific, & cos you can’t understand why they did it or what they gain from it, you call them ‘mentally ill’
I see it all the time on social media
Trump does something horrendous and everyone claims he’s mentally ill
Someone commits a horrific crime and everyone diagnoses them with something
They aren’t ‘mentally ill’, they are just a fuckin horrible person who chooses to abuse.
Someone you don’t like tweets something you don’t agree with and you’re all in the comments claiming they have a personality disorder.
No they don’t, you just don’t like what they said and you’re using psychiatric terms to label and stigmatise
I have been working for years to reform practice in child sexual abuse and exploitation - and now it is finally coming to the point where it is working.
I know I’ve made myself extremely unpopular - but it has been worth it to force the field to reflect and improve.
Sometimes, you’ll work hard and get no recognition and no thanks, sometimes you might even be hated for your work - but it will be worth it to see the change you have made to real lives and the real world.
I knew this would happen to me when I first set out to do it.
I remember saying to people that it didn’t matter how people viewed me personally, as long as I made the field uncomfortable with poor practice and showed them how to critically reflect and to stop blaming children for being abused and traumatised.