Thankful to Singapore for surveillance systems that allow for the detailed studies required to truly assess the relative transmission risk of asymptomatic vs symptomatic cov-2 👇, which they find to be much higher in those who develop symptoms /1
There is a prevailing narrative right now that the 90%+ protection from symptomatic cov-2 by the mrna vaccines might not sizably reduce infection or transmission
/5
These studies strongly suggest that even if vaccines do not reduce risk of infection, they will substantially reduce risk of transmission
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday @EricMeyerowitz and I presented insights from new COVID19 papers published over the last month at the HOPE conference. Posting slides and video if interested
Political appointees move to silence @CDCMMWR reports, the weekly lifeline from a barely functioning institution and the cornerstone of public health reporting in the US
Selection of reports that have been essential to understanding the US epidemic 👇🏻
This is the key observation that somehow has not really made it outside of hospital circles. Still waiting for the first detailed report from a large health system of in-hospital transmissions in the universal masking era. Per hospital epis I’ve spoken with close to 0
This Lancet report gets highly referenced suggesting healthcare workers higher risk but 1) much of it pre-universal masking 2) don’t report whether community acquired (much of it is per other publications from healthcare) 3) no contact tracing
This paper of 226 patient contacts of healthcare workers w CoV2 (both pre and post universal masking) is probably the best 1 on the subject — they found one possible transmission, during a 30 minute encounter w both patient and healthcare worker unmasked
Really nice to see this WHO analysis in JAMA (along w 3 RCTs) put to bed the importance of corticosteroids in ventilated patients w COVID-19. A lot of good stuff here.
So what to do w steroids in those requiring supp O2 only? /1
RECOVERY results suggest a mortality benefit in this population (supp O2 only), and I have seen basically every patient in this category receive dex, appropriately... but there are enough odd features of this single open-label trial that make me wonder. /2
Much of this nuance is explained well in this thread by @FranciscoMarty_
The main thing that nags me personally is how ridiculously high the mortality was in RECOVERY - 26.2% among those requiring O2 and receiving usual care /3
To add to this - today we have a very nice study of patient contacts of infected healthcare workers, with universal masking implemented during the study period /1