"Fail to prepare, prepare to fail" has gone from being an irritating statement trotted out on a training course to a description of the UK government's modus operandi. And as well as on covid restrictions we're seeing it in EU negotiations - deal or no-deal. And here's why... 1/
The UK's goal in EU negotiations is to declare victory / sovereignty. Sounds good. But the problem is that there will always be winners and losers in a big trade deal, because it covers everything and involves compromising with the other side. An immediate problem. 2/
Take fish, on which apparently talks are stuck. No deal means we regain full control of our waters. Victory! And sell the fish where? EU tariffs and checks. Not victory. So share waters? But then, defeat! Point being, if you don't explain, the result will disappoint. 3/
We don't want the EU setting our rules and regulations. So minimal sovereignty provisions. No-deal and victory! But then what about the car manufacturers no longer viable? Ok, compromise. But then no win on sovereignty, or perhaps call it "freedom clauses"... 4/
Northern Ireland, customs checks, rules of origin, security cooperation and so on... all inevitably to require compromise. But if your game was all about victory and sovereignty, then what? Not make a decision perhaps? 5/
In a way it is the UK dilemma since 2016 writ large. We can't have all the benefits of the single market and none of the costs. But nobody wanted to say that. And we went into these talks with a similar mindset. But more importantly, a similar message. Victory will be ours! 6/
That victory over the EU is currently looking about as good as the victory over Covid, and for more or less the same reasons. No evident planning, poor communication, no preparing people for the realistic outcomes. And for the EU - another party with interests. 7/
The government might get away with it on EU negotiations through boredom and technical detail. After all, no checks on Britain - Northern Ireland trade has become fewer checks for registered traders, without (yet) huge anger. But hardly a win. It could happen with a deal. 8/
But if you've gone from declaring victory to hoping nobody notices the details and still can't decide if that works enough for a deal then you haven't succeeded. And heaven only knows what we could have had if we actually thought about priorities other than "victory"... 9/
In short, infantile simplism politics in a grown up trade-offs world. Want want want as a strategy which must inevitably fail. Listen to anyone who has improbable plans for success, not anyone who points out the flaws. Act surprised when it fails. But you failed to prepare... 10/
How can it not be a failure when you don't know the details for how half of your trade will operate 11 days before it changes? Something no country has ever done before, and I suspect will never do so again. And you don't even know deal or no-deal. The case rests. 11/ end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Henig

David Henig Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidHenigUK

21 Dec
Useful thread. It seems to me that the fisheries talks are stuck because the UK didn't predict the EU reaction to the idea of a deep cut, or didn't repare UK fishing fleets for a much smaller one. fwiw on this one we knew the UK had a strong hand, but how has it been used?
Equally the EU thought the UK would trade their strongest card, fish, for something else, like a trade deal. Because the idea of tariff free trade in fish when the UK caught it all has to be a non-starter. But such are the discussions in trade talks that take time.
The level playing field and fish, classic difficult issues that can be solved in trade talks given a lot more time than the UK and EU have allowed. Issues that have deep domestic sensitivities. But as we stand red lines do not appear to allow a deal.
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec
HOW DARE OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE POLITICS THAT AFFECT THE UK?
Honestly after four and a half years it might be to our benefit to learn something about the way the EU negotiates with third countries.

(tough. though since those saying so are weirdly regarded as EU lovers that may explain some of the problem)
I wonder whether the UK government might consider actually putting some effort into having some allies in Europe? This Pacific stuff is all well and good but looks a bit useless when you face a real problem...
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec
And shouldn't be arguing over fish, or potential future tariffs for unfair competition. But these are the political decisions made over priorities. The sides have chosen their ground, and what they think they are worth. They will be judged by their domestic stakeholders.
If there's no UK-EU deal we're going to hear a lot from folk talking about a failure of statecraft. Often followed by suggesting EU demands were unrealistic. But it will have been a choice of both sides not to pay the price the other demanded for a deal. Which they have to own.
Failure of statecraft - some general high-minded sounding statement vaguely implying someone else's fault.

No-deal - choice of the UK (and EU). With consequences.
Read 7 tweets
19 Dec
Two decisions in one day or even week from the PM is probably a bit ambitious.

And even I, sitting on the fence all year as to deal or not, based on the PMs legendary indecision, thought it might have happened by 11 days before the end of the transition period.
Though business has been preparing for no-deal (no choice) and voting with their lorries so to speak.

What a way not to run the country though. 2% of GDP, tariffs, and the car manufacturing sector among others waiting.
Still a chance this is one last getting tough with the EU Sunday headline before a deal, but equally the failure of the PM to reach a decision is beginning to confound all possible analysis.
Read 5 tweets
19 Dec
Areas of movement and areas of stickiness. Some of this is just normal trade deal haggling, some is more difficult. And all of it would normally take place over months rather than days.
The fundamental problem, that the UK thinks a trade deal is a fundamental right, whereas the EU always insist preferential access to their market only comes at a cost, remains unresolved, exacerbated by too many comments from sudden UK experts in EU trade policy.
Issues between the UK and EU can't possibly be resolved over the weekend. Too deep. But both sides can agree to paper over the cracks, the UK agreeing to the principle of cost, the EU smoothing it over with various practical facilitation. That's where the deal is.
Read 4 tweets
18 Dec
This is very good on fish and related trade from @DanielThomasLDN - what it brings home is the way an enitre trading ecosystem changes on January 1. Deal or no-deal, the UK economy will be heavily affected. ft.com/content/b172dc…
The deeper economics goes like this - higher trade barriers typically lead to less competitive businesses in a country. But we need our business to be more competitive than ever to try to win business outside the EU. Brexit may lead to lower exports to the EU and other countries.
The varied world of services may however hold up better than expected. We are already highly competitive, and the barriers may be easier to get round than those in goods, at least in some areas. However, that is speculative, research in services trade is not great.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!