Thanks Irnest. My investing philosophy is that we need to start with good first principles/frameworks like the ones in that document, but then adapt it to the current Business/Market environment.
-Valuing CO's that are going for growth instead of Profitability when there's lot of opportunity to be captured yet.
-Intended lack of Profitability (in many cases) causing over-valuation of (or negative) Earnings based metrics.
-Co's investing mainly thru Income statement (R&D, S&M) to grow and create value rather than Balance sheet (Hard Assets, CapEx)
-Importance of Intangibles and other metrics not captured by Accounting (Mgmt Quality, emerging Moat, Culture....)
-Trying to fit these type of CO's into the old Accounting/Valuation box doesn't fully work. So in my opinion, this topic has become a lot more nuanced and subjective.
I'm not defending every unprofitable & over-valued Company out there 🙂, just pointing out that the current GAAP standards do not capture the true Economic value being created by some great Co's out there, and that's an area of opportunity for investors who can dig deeper.
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Time for a Scorecard📊and thesis📑updates for purchases done in Feb/Mar 2020. Last review done in late April. How far things have come since then.😯
Not taking any drastic actions, other than few sells in fully valued, slower growth Co.'s.
Events since then
✔️Co's reporting two Qtrly reports
✔️Accelerating growth for few sectors
✔️Understandable problems for few others
✔️Crazy run-ups & valuations in the last 9 mo's, supported by biz growth in some cases, but mostly due to Monetary factors & Investor enthusiasm...
I usually buy for two scenarios
1⃣Leading Co's within strong secular trends, that also have strong Management Teams and solid Financials (Rev growth, Profitability or improving Margins/FCF prospects, no balance sheet risk...).