Ignoring context, including Trump’s serial lying, does nothing to advance election integrity. Pretending he’s honest or credible turns off anyone who pays attention and cares about credibility. 1/
I call out credibility fails wherever they arise. 2/
3/
4/
5/
6/
7/ I do not entertain propaganda. Credibility matters to me. Once it’s lost, it is very difficult to get it back.
8/ Voters need to know who is making a good faith effort to be straight with them and who isn’t. Credibility matters. To ignore that does nothing to advance election integrity imo.
9/ I spend a lot of time trying to identify who is a straight shooter and who isn’t.
10/
11/ Context and accountability matter too. Ignoring the recent past helps hucksters on the right benefit from their own election integrity obstruction. It does nothing to advance justice or integrity.
12/ Knowing who makes a good faith attempt to be truthful—and who doesn’t—matters.
17/ I wish Greg Gordon did more election security reporting. This piece was excellent and led to many follow up investigative pieces by local journalists re voting machine vendor ES&S’s corruption. mcclatchydc.com/latest-news/ar…
18/ This 2017 piece by Victoria Collier is still probably the best election-security piece ever written. harpers.org/archive/2012/1…
19/ And I still consider this reporting by @kimzetter re: ES&S to have been the biggest election-security bombshell of the past several years (other than the NSA report leaked by #RealityWinner). vice.com/en/article/mb4…
20/ And I still can’t understand why @ACLU, the Democrats, & others haven’t called for #RealityWinner’s release. Her prison sentence was excessive, cruel and unfair.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seriously, do Rs not care about credibility at all? Or are they unaware of how much team Trump lies? Attorney Lin Wood was responsible for this ridiculously faulty affidavit by Russell Ramsland that swapped MN and MI. Giuliani continued using it after it was debunked. Liars. 1/
2/ More lying by Team Trump. Powell’s “military intelligence expert” never worked in military intelligence.
Interesting read about how those who questioned election results in 2000 (when Bush won by 537 votes > a machine deleted 16K Gore votes & Rs blocked the recount) & 04 (When Rs re-routed Ohio’s results 2 Smartech) have reacted 2 Trump screaming “rigged!” 1/ politico.com/news/magazine/…
The 16k vote deletion was corrected before certification. But there never was a statewide recount. The Florida Supreme Court ordered one, but the US Supreme Court shut it down. 2/
This piece discusses the 16k deleted Gore votes in Volusia county and how the explanation—a corrupted memory card—made no sense. 3/ nytimes.com/2018/09/26/mag…
This piece misleads. It begins with McConnell’s outdated 18% approval rating, then acknowledges he “clawed” it up to 39%, but omits that McConnell’s approval was much higher than McGrath’s, and omits the poll that had McConnell approval at 44%. 1/ rawstory.com/2020/12/why-th…
2/ “Likely voters have a mixed opinion of Senator McConnell, with 44 % saying they have a favorable opinion of him, while 46 % say they have an unfavorable opinion of him. Amy McGrath receives a negative 34 - 47 percent favorability rating. “ - Oct. 2020 poll.qu.edu/kentucky/relea…
3/ It also omits that the exit polls predicted a strong McConnell victory. Yes, McConnell won by more than the polls predicted, but this information should not have been omitted from the piece since the piece begins w/ a discussion of the polls.
This piece misleads. It begins with McConnell’s outdated 18% approval rating, then acknowledges he “clawed” it up to 39%, but omits that McConnell’s approval was much higher than McGrath’s, omits the poll that had McConnell approval at 44%, & returns to the 18% number. 1/
2/ “Likely voters have a mixed opinion of Senator McConnell, with 44 % saying they have a favorable opinion of him, while 46 % say they have an unfavorable opinion of him. Amy McGrath receives a negative 34 - 47 percent favorability rating. “ - Oct. 2020 poll.qu.edu/kentucky/relea…
3/ It also omits that the exit polls predicted a strong McConnell victory. Yes, McConnell won by more than the polls predicted, but this information should not have been omitted from the piece since the piece begins w/ a discussion of the polls. tdmsresearch.com/2020/12/14/202…
“The GOP was seeking a court order that would force state election officials to have three people verify each signature and allow significantly more access to the canvassing process for partisan observers.” 2/
“But the state argued no such demands were made for in-person voting, even though verification of a state ID was open to just as much interpretation and error.” 3/