Interesting read about how those who questioned election results in 2000 (when Bush won by 537 votes > a machine deleted 16K Gore votes & Rs blocked the recount) & 04 (When Rs re-routed Ohio’s results 2 Smartech) have reacted 2 Trump screaming “rigged!” 1/ politico.com/news/magazine/…
The 16k vote deletion was corrected before certification. But there never was a statewide recount. The Florida Supreme Court ordered one, but the US Supreme Court shut it down. 2/
This piece discusses the 16k deleted Gore votes in Volusia county and how the explanation—a corrupted memory card—made no sense. 3/ nytimes.com/2018/09/26/mag…
4/ Unlike the Antrim Michigan situation in 2020, where a Republican clerk explained how her own error caused a problem, a plausible explanation was never provided for the Volusia error in 2004.
5/ From the NYT about 2000: “[A] faulty memory card shld produce an onscreen error message or cause a computer to lock up, not alter votes in one race while leaving others untouched. And what kind of faulty card deleted votes only 4 Gore, while adding votes to other candidates?”
6/ The re-routing of Ohio’s 2004 results to Smartech in TN is discussed in this iconic piece by Victoria Collier in Harper’s. harpers.org/archive/2012/1…
7/ Explanation from the Republican county clerk in Antrim Michigan of what went wrong there in 2020. record-eagle.com/news/disinform…
8/ “Recording Reveals ALEC and GOP Election Attorneys [and the CNP] Working with State Legislators to Question Validity of Election” — in February, long before the election took place. By @JamieMCoreydocumented.net/2020/10/newly-…
Trump’s election-fraud claims have caused a rift in the election-integrity community bc some recognize that Trump is a serial liar who never acts in good faith, whereas others think all election-fraud claims shld be given = consideration regardless of context or credibility. 9/
Example of the rift, though as far as I know, Bev hasn’t tried to help Trump spread election integrity nonsense. She’s done more for election integrity than most — myself included — by far. Some have actually tried to help Trump spread lies. 10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seriously, do Rs not care about credibility at all? Or are they unaware of how much team Trump lies? Attorney Lin Wood was responsible for this ridiculously faulty affidavit by Russell Ramsland that swapped MN and MI. Giuliani continued using it after it was debunked. Liars. 1/
2/ More lying by Team Trump. Powell’s “military intelligence expert” never worked in military intelligence.
Ignoring context, including Trump’s serial lying, does nothing to advance election integrity. Pretending he’s honest or credible turns off anyone who pays attention and cares about credibility. 1/
This piece misleads. It begins with McConnell’s outdated 18% approval rating, then acknowledges he “clawed” it up to 39%, but omits that McConnell’s approval was much higher than McGrath’s, and omits the poll that had McConnell approval at 44%. 1/ rawstory.com/2020/12/why-th…
2/ “Likely voters have a mixed opinion of Senator McConnell, with 44 % saying they have a favorable opinion of him, while 46 % say they have an unfavorable opinion of him. Amy McGrath receives a negative 34 - 47 percent favorability rating. “ - Oct. 2020 poll.qu.edu/kentucky/relea…
3/ It also omits that the exit polls predicted a strong McConnell victory. Yes, McConnell won by more than the polls predicted, but this information should not have been omitted from the piece since the piece begins w/ a discussion of the polls.
This piece misleads. It begins with McConnell’s outdated 18% approval rating, then acknowledges he “clawed” it up to 39%, but omits that McConnell’s approval was much higher than McGrath’s, omits the poll that had McConnell approval at 44%, & returns to the 18% number. 1/
2/ “Likely voters have a mixed opinion of Senator McConnell, with 44 % saying they have a favorable opinion of him, while 46 % say they have an unfavorable opinion of him. Amy McGrath receives a negative 34 - 47 percent favorability rating. “ - Oct. 2020 poll.qu.edu/kentucky/relea…
3/ It also omits that the exit polls predicted a strong McConnell victory. Yes, McConnell won by more than the polls predicted, but this information should not have been omitted from the piece since the piece begins w/ a discussion of the polls. tdmsresearch.com/2020/12/14/202…
“The GOP was seeking a court order that would force state election officials to have three people verify each signature and allow significantly more access to the canvassing process for partisan observers.” 2/
“But the state argued no such demands were made for in-person voting, even though verification of a state ID was open to just as much interpretation and error.” 3/
This @GrassrootsSpeak thread about KY went viral. I didn’t realize until @JonathanSimon14 questioned it today that the 18% approval # was from a few years ago. In reality, McConnell’s KY approval was much higher closer to the 2020 election (& much higher than McGrath’s). 1/
2/ “Likely voters have a mixed opinion of Senator McConnell, with 44 % saying they have a favorable opinion of him, while 46 % say they have an unfavorable opinion of him. Amy McGrath receives a negative 34 - 47 percent favorability rating. “ - Oct. 2020 poll.qu.edu/kentucky/relea…
3/ McConnell was expected to win. That said, he won by a lot more than the exit polls predicted. tdmsresearch.com/2020/12/14/202…