1/ In September 1993, then-Microsoft exec Nathan Myhrvold wrote his landmark memo "Road Kill on the Information Highway", laying out a dozen-ish predictions on the rise of the internet

27 years later, I think it's a super interesting case study. Let's evaluate the predictions -
2/ PREDICTION #1: The rise of a surveillance society - police bodycams, CCTV, 24/7 personal recording, and deepfakes

GRADE: A-

Pretty close!
3/ PREDICTION #2: Telecommuting, an end to the "tyranny of geography" and gerrymandering

GRADE: B-

Alas, the electoral college still matters today. The WFH prediction hits closer, but turns out it took two and a half decades + a pandemic to get things going
4/ PREDICTION #3: Telco convergence - phone companies become cable providers and vice versa

GRADE: A-

Honestly this one was a bit of a layup, although it took 15 years longer than anyone expected
5/ PREDICTION #4: The rise of online neo-banks

GRADE: C

Three decades later, and physical banks still exist. Neobanks have a presence in emerging markets, UK, and basically nowhere else. Regulatory inertia: officially a thing
6/ PREDICTION #5: "Newspapers are in probably the worst situation of any form of print media"

GRADE: A+

Frankly I was shocked by the prescience of this section. Newspapers were once local advertising monopolies. The internet broke that monopoly
7/ PREDICTION #6: "Television broadcasters are some of the most likely fodder for roadkill of any of the current media companies"

GRADE: B+

Pretty much right, but 21 years too early. Broadcasters kept growing until 2014
8/ PREDICTION #7: The internet will expand the market for Hollywood content. Also, Blockbuster is toast

GRADE: A

The iron law of media investing is that over any long enough timeframe, value inexorably accrues to the content owner
9/ PREDICTION #8: Traditional PCs will be replaced by lightweight, low-end internet terminals

GRADE: C+

Say what you will about low end disruption, but after all these years I still don't want to use a Chromebook
10/ In retrospect, most of Myrhvold's predictions were pretty good. His call on the print media was spectacularly right. His calls on TV, Hollywood, and telcos took a while, but ultimately happened. Telecommuting and 24/7 surveillance are still shifting in realtime...
11/ The one catch? Timing

Nearly all these predictions took 15-20+ years to play out. WFH is still 25+ years in the making. Nothing in the memo (except shorting newspapers) would've been investable on any reasonable timeframe

Predicting the future is easy. Making money is hard!
Several people have now messaged me that this prediction would’ve been much closer if you replaced “IHCs” with “smartphones”

Fair enough!

UPDATED GRADE: A-

Myrhvold wasn’t thinking about mobile devices in his original memo, but ex post facto, the parallels are hard to deny

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Corry Wang

Corry Wang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @corry_wang

1 Sep
I can't post the whole report, but by popular demand, here are a few additional excerpts from my farewell note at Bernstein:

(1/x)
2/ This note was originally my boss Toni's idea, i.e. that I should finally put pencil to paper on all of the various tech / investing thoughts that had been floating around my head

The specific "maxims" are partly jokes, but hopefully with kernels of truth belying them
3/ "Predicting the future is easy, making money is hard"

This maxim seemed to get the most traction on Fintwit (and I really do believe it)...
Read 13 tweets
16 Jul 19
1/ The most interesting thing I’ve read all day: Bill Gurley’s 2001 (!) obituary of the software industry’s first aborted attempt to move to subscription

abovethecrowd.com/2001/10/29/whe…
2/ I mean, I had heard of application service providers before, but man this was straight-up SaaS all the way back in 1995
3/ So why did SaaS 1.0 fail? What’s different this time?

The most obvious difference is just cheap capital: Gurley blamed “capital availability” for sinking the ASPs, but today investors are more than fine with financing -50% FCF margins
Read 5 tweets
2 Apr 19
Just read a sell-side note comparing legacy CPG / Amazon to legacy media / Netflix.

Half-baked Tuesday contrarian thought experiment: what would be potential reasons why Amazon private label might *not* ever disrupt CPG? Two come to mind for me:
1) Lack of focus by Amazon

Aka the same reason why traditional private label didn't kill CPG

P&G is never building its own 2-day shipping infrastructure. Meanwhile, the media networks would've eventually built their own SVOD services; this was do-or-die for Netflix in 2012
2) Physical products are not zero marginal cost (obviously)

The fixed nature of content costs is what enables the Netflix flywheel: more subscribers = more content spend = wider moat

Amazon private label has no obvious advantage along these lines; they're just another brand
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar 19
To me, the critical long-term question for $LYFT / Uber is whether they can ultimately raise price without A) killing demand elasticity & B) inviting new entrants. The latter depends on how strong ridesharing network effects are... & I’m increasingly unsure about this. 3 issues:
1) Ridesharing networks are local, not national.

This one is obvious to anybody’s who’s taken Via or Juno in NYC. Not necessarily a dealbreaker - Yelp is local too and they’ve been fine + there are some advantages to a national ridesharing network too (i.e. when I’m traveling)
2a) Ridesharing networks are rivalrous

This is critical: there is a local maxima in utility. Beyond a certain scale, wait times / utilization depend on the *relative* number of riders to drivers, not the absolute.
Read 6 tweets
29 Mar 19
1/ Finally read the Lyft S-1 a few hours ago (yes seriously I didn't do it until today, I'm a lazy POS). A few observations...
2/ As @modestproposal1 has pointed out, Lyft's cut of each ride just keeps going up every quarter. In fact, increases in Lyft's take rate have accounted for ~25% of the company's revenue growth in the last 2 years
3/ More importantly, take rate is Lyft's key profitability lever - any increase in take rate pretty much flows directly down to the gross profit line. The result is that Lyft's take rates are just under ~30% today... which feels pretty damn high
Read 6 tweets
23 Mar 19
A contrarian sentiment I've heard a lot recently is that "small and focused always wins" in tech. Now, this certainly *felt* right the first time I heard it - off the top of my head, I couldn't actually think of that many counterexamples
But on the other hand, this could just be the availability heuristic at work... so in the interest of intellectual honesty, I sat down for 20 minutes and compiled a list of every small and focused tech company I could think of that ultimately got stomped. Here's what I got:
1) Netscape -> Microsoft
2) Fitbit / Jawbone -> the Apple Watch
3) Lotus Notes -> Microsoft Word
4) Blackberry and Palm -> the iPhone (in the eternal words of Palm CEO Ed Colligan, circa 2006: “PC guys are not going to just figure this out")
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!