The COVID relief bill we are passing on the floor today will be the 2nd biggest appropriations bill ever passed by Congress (after CARES, bigger than ARRA). It is enormously impactful and yet will only buy us a couple months to bridge to Biden.
So be wary of anyone who tells you that (a) injecting $900B into the economy isn't a big deal OR (b) that our work here is done and we must now shift to fiscal austerity.
We pushed for much more money, way back in June in the House, but McConnell ignored it. He has acted now on this smaller, later bill because he's nervous losing his majority. What we got isn't nothing. But getting what we need in a few months depends on Georgia.
But for now, let's acknowledge what we did:
- $300/month unemployment insurance
- $600 direct payments (subject to your income)
- eligibility for both of above now covers mixed-income households (e.g., where only one has a SSN)
- >$300B in new PPP funding to help small businesses
- Additional targeted support for entertainment venues
- Expanded PPP eligibility for restaurants
- $ to airlines that has to be preferentially used for employees\
- $69B for vaccine development, distribution, testing
- $25B in emergency rental assistance, including eviction moratoriums
- $7B for broadband, targeted to poor / rural areas to keep the internet on
- $13B in food assistance (increased SNAP eligibility, TFAP, etc)
- College students with food insecurity now eligible for SNAP
This is a partial list, and as I said at the start, is not everything we want nor everything our country needs. Such is the nature of negotiating with someone who's preference is to do nothing but tax cuts for those who already have plenty.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So as we wait for the vote on our year end spending package, an #energytwitter nerd thread, prompted by yesterday's poll. What agency is responsible for US energy policy?
1/ First an apology to my wife and her colleagues in the market research industry. This was a poorly constructed poll and results should be taken with a grain of salt.
2/ My own view (which @ronen_schatsky correctly sussed out) is "none". This was a trick question. I will stipulate that the lack of consensus among the Nerds of EnergyTwitter is directionally consistent with that view.
This article is tragic. The Trump administration's politicization of science kept Americans from having accurate information and when the dust settles will be shown to have caused massive death and suffering.
(Sadly, we will as long as the @GOP remains completely hostile to the idea of objective truth. See: climate change or the winner of the 2020 election, or allowing witness testimony at trials... or too, too many other examples.)
That in turn means that any full reckoning for this moment cannot happen on a bipartisan basis until the @GOP reforms itself, which is not likely any time soon.
I'm glad to see this, but wish that discussions of fiscal matters in Washington didn't always confuse the terms "accretive capital investment" and "deficit spending". eenews.net/stories/106372…
This is a real problem: when we "score" bills to evaluate their fiscal impact, we consider impacts on short-term cash flow, but ignore any offsetting increase in asset values.
For anyone who says "we should run government like a business", show me a business that doesn't have a balance sheet.
We have serious challenges facing us as a nation, from COVID to climate change to the economy. And yet only 27 out of 249 @GOP members of the House and Senate will acknowledge that 306 is greater than 232.
This isn't intended as snark. It is deadly serious. An entire party, from the leadership to the bottom has no anchor of facts on which to base action beyond short term politics (or, if they believe this, outright stupidity).
We would do well not to treat them as serious thinkers on policy, science or arithmetic until they demonstrate by their actions they have earned that respect.
It's been a while, #energytwitter, but it's time for another nerd rant. This time on the difference between being pro-market and pro-business, and how that has distorted US energy policy. Thread:
1/ First, an observation that is too often over-looked. NO ONE comes to Washington to advocate for economic efficiency. That is a problem, and a massive opportunity.
2/ By economic efficiency, I mean the stuff you learned in the 1st chapter of freshman econ which was stipulated to be true for the math in the rest of the book to hold up. No barriers to entry / exit. Transparency of information. etc.
The Trump era is coming to a close. Whether the @GOP is able to recover it's soul depends substantially on whether elected GOP officials stand up for democracy and the peaceful transfer of power right now or cower before the base Trump has radicalized. Thread:
1. First, understand what is happening. The elections on 11/3 saw a surge of first time votes by white men without a college degree. That substantially explains why the @GOP did better than anticipated (bc first time voters are hard to poll)
2. But with no one in senior @GOP leadership who is capable of leading, they are afraid of what might happen to their party if that base doesn't stay mobilized (see: Georgia special elections).