The Trump era is coming to a close. Whether the @GOP is able to recover it's soul depends substantially on whether elected GOP officials stand up for democracy and the peaceful transfer of power right now or cower before the base Trump has radicalized. Thread:
1. First, understand what is happening. The elections on 11/3 saw a surge of first time votes by white men without a college degree. That substantially explains why the @GOP did better than anticipated (bc first time voters are hard to poll)
2. But with no one in senior @GOP leadership who is capable of leading, they are afraid of what might happen to their party if that base doesn't stay mobilized (see: Georgia special elections).
3. So, given the choice between ensuring a peaceful transfer of power and an affirmation of our democratic institutions vs. risking it all for a couple Senate races in GA, McConnell, McCarthy and their ilk are all betting on the latter.
4. That is cowardly. It is dangerous. It is unpatriotic. It is the opposite of leadership. But it is their choice, and no one in the @GOP should expect any more of them at this point. They told us who they were the first time.
5. So the question for the @GOP at this point is whether their future lies in the center they are struggling to hold, or the radical, ever-widening gyre of their QAnon crazy fringe.
6. I'm a Democrat, obviously. But I'm an American first and fear for our country if a major political party is doubling down on racism, lies and fear. No matter what party you belong to, you should not welcome the absence of genuine, patriotic leadership in today's GOP.
7. But - as I said in my election night speech - leaders rarely arise before a movement exists. Lots of rank & file members of the GOP aren't Trumpists. They don't have to lead the party back; they just have to stop being silent. "Come on, rise up", as the song says.
8. So to all the city, county and state level Republicans who what the party of McCain back, who were secretly happy that Trump lost but have spent the last four years afraid to speak lest He tweet at you. The emperor is gone. Speak.
9. You needn't do much. Just imagine if all of you started congratulating @JoeBiden on his victory. If just one of you did it, people might think you're crazy. But imagine if 50 of you did it? Why they might think it's a movement.
10. While you're at it, consider thanking all our election officials who pulled off a safe election under unprecedented stresses. Consider thanking all Americans who participated in our democracy, regardless of who they voted for.
11. And if you're feeling particularly brave and patriotic, consider defending objective truth and the germ theory of disease. Encourage people to wear masks and social distance. Thank Dr. Fauci.
12. But in all cases, you don't need to be partisan. You just need to be a proud American, and to recognize that in this moment, we need your voice. Nothing in this thread should be seen as partisan. But it will be unless you speak. This is your moment. Rise up. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This week's #energytwitter nerd thread: an overview of the Tradeable Performance Standard (GHG pricing) bill I released yesterday. It's the best GHG pricing bill ever. Read on to find out why! Thread:
2/ I've been working on this for a LONG time. Started based on conversations with @kacolburn when RGGI was being developed in the early 2000s. Later sketched out an overview for Grist in 2008: grist.org/article/carbon…
In our recent debate, my opponent raised the "Great Barrington Declaration". It is a massively dangerous and deadly idea that will lead to millions of dead Americans. We need to shut it down. Now. Thread:
1/ First, I am not going to link to it or give it any oxygen. You can find the discussion in the video here if you want: wgntv.com/news/watch-liv…
2/ It is a heaping, stinking pile of junk science, advocating that we isolate the sick and the elderly and pretend that COVID doesn't affect young healthy people in the name of "restarting" the economy and herd immunity.
In the words of the inestimable Jim Anchower, it's been a while since I rapped at ya, #energytwitter. Today's thread: capital budgeting in the industrial sector and what that means for the (in)efficiency of energy investments in that space.
1/ First, as many of you know, I spent 16 years before coming to Congress running companies that built, owned and/or operated energy assets in the industrial sector. I built 80 projects. I failed to close an order of magnitude more.
2/ One of the disconnects you find in that industry is that at every trade show you meet people selling boiler economizers, more efficient heat exchangers, better insulation or any number of other efficiency technologies with the same sad story:
There is a very dangerous conversation going on suggesting that the path to beating COVID is through herd immunity. This is massively dangerous, and will lead to the death of millions of Americans. Facts matter. Here are the ones you need (thread):
1/ First, if you're not already following @gregggonsalves you should. He is an epidemiologist, spend decades studying AIDS and knows this stuff. See his thread on herd immunity here:
2/ The idea that we can choose to kill people or grow our economy is also wrong. Sweden, famously has tried to pursue herd immunity and only managed to kill more Swedes and hurt their economy. medpagetoday.com/infectiousdise…
This has been a rough week in DC, but maybe we need some #energytwitter nerd threads to distract us. Today: why economy-wide GHG pricing doesn't work for the transportation sector, absent complementary policies.
1/ First, stipulate that "economy wide GHG pricing" is a supply/demand-set price per ton (or any other mechanism that treats all tons of GHG pollution as economically equivalent.)
2/ Suppose you buy a reciprocating engine to generate electricity. You run it 5 days/week, all year long, or 5x24x52 = 6,240 hours per year. When you make that investment, you plan on keeping it for 15 years before you have to replace it.