Even at this late stage there is a deal to be struck in UK/EU talks. I've tried to set out a landing zone on fishing for @POLITICOEurope. With both sides facing immense health & economic challenges a deal is more important than ever. Here is my proposal 1/ politico.eu/article/opinio…
There look to be three big areas of disagreement on fish.

1) Length of transition to new quota shares
2) Exact mount by which EU quota in UK waters is reduced
3) What happens in future if EU quota falls further or access is changed

Let me take each in turn. 2/
On length of transition. UK wants 3 years, EU 7 years. 5 years seems a fair compromise. Allows both sides time to adjust. From UK perspective, UK fleets can build up in anticipation of new quota they know they'll get. Its also a lot longer than any other sector has to prepare 3/
On quota reduction. UK is seeking 60% reduction in current EU quota share in UK waters. EU offering 25%. I'd think 35% would be a reasonable starting position at end of transition (phased in over the 5 years). 4/
But, importantly, this shouldn't be a permanent agreement. As with all other fisheries agreements, this will be negotiated on a multi-annual basis. So quota shares and access to UK waters could change in the future. 5/
The trickiest difference is on what happens if that quota/access does change. It does not make sense to reopen the entire FTA every time fisheries is negotiated. This would cause huge uncertainty for businesses on both sides. 6/
Equally, it is clear EU won't accept no link between fish & wider FTA. Therefore, I'd propose that if quota/access does change in future an independent arbitration panel can determine the value of that loss to EU. 7/
The panel would then allow or recommend EU take remedial measures across the rest of the FTA of equal value. Furthermore, the FTA will include a termination clause. As such it remains open to the EU to give notice of termination if it isn't happy with fisheries outcome. 8/
This though would be a last resort option, rather than a first resort option as has been suggested so far. It would likely trigger a period of negotiation on all issues including fish (though the politics post termination would of course be very difficult). 9/
As with any compromise, this isn't perfect. But there is something in there for both sides. From EU perspective it secures continued access & quota in UK waters & offers a sensible phase in so there is no cliff edge for their fishing industry. 10/
From the UK side there are a number of benefits. Currently UK vessels catch roughly 40% by volume & 55% by value of fish in UK waters. Under this proposal that would increase to over two thirds of the value. Worth between €140m - €200m for UK fishing industry. 11/
It would also secure the circa €100m in fish which UK vessels catch in EU waters. Meaning a significant gain in the value of fish caught by UK vessels & indeed no loss from now. 12/
The approach would also secure zero tariff & quota on UK fish/related products sold into the EU worth €130m pa. Quota & catch are only one side of the equation. Just as important is securing tariff free access to EU market, to ensure the value of the catch can be maximised 13/
These are not numbers to be sniffed at. They will help secure the revival of the UK fishing industry. Whatever happens, that will take time. Compared to 1990 UK fishing employs 50% fewer people. It cannot recover over night. 14/
The alternative on fishing is not pretty for either side. EU vessels with no access or quota in UK waters from day one. UK vessels with no ability to catch additional quota nor ability to compete on price in EU market. 15/
Stepping back, the wider deal also looks to meet UK aims. It sees UK: leave single market & customs union, end free movement of people, end ECJ in UK, end any regulatory alignment & be able to strike on trade deals. That delivers on the referendum - by any definition 16/
Even on state aid & fishing, the outcomes will be a world away from EU's opening proposal of maintaining status quo. I must give huge credit to @BorisJohnson & @DavidGHFrost for the outcomes they have secured. Indeed, they've done better than I expected in many areas 17/
Finally, with everything else going on it would be a damning political & diplomatic failure for all if two close allies in the UK & EU could not agree on their future trade terms. There is a sensible deal on the table for both sides, it is not too late to grasp it. 18/ ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Raoul Ruparel

Raoul Ruparel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RaoulRuparel

14 Dec
Not a huge amount to say on UK/EU future relationship talks. Small signs of progress, but still tricky details to be sorted. Instead a thread on the NI agreement reached last week, on which there has been surprisingly little discussion. A good outcome given the circumstances 1/
The agreement on implementing NI Protocol looks better for the UK than I expected in many ways. Of course, there are still lots of additional challenges for business, but it could have been a lot worse. 2/
First on at risk tariffs. The most important point here is that the UK Trader Scheme will not only remove tariffs if no FTA, but essentially remove rules of origin requirements for GB to NI traders in the scheme even with an FTA. 3/
Read 12 tweets
24 Nov
Having looked at the economic impact of Brexit & Covid a lot, this will probably turn out to be true but we can't know for sure now. It all depends on your assumptions about the long term scarring on our economy from Covid. (1/4)
Brexit presents a set of known permanent changes which incur costs. Covid & the response have a lot of huge short term economic costs, but many of these may prove to be temporary once things return to normal. But importantly that is not guaranteed. (2/4)
This is partly why the Government has unleashed unprecedented economic support, in order to avoid the short term impacts becoming longer term & viable parts of the economy being destroyed permanently. But we don't yet know how successful that has been or will be. (3/4)
Read 4 tweets
15 Nov
Ahead of a crucial week in Brexit talks, issue of level playing field (beyond state aid) has become a major obstacle to a deal. Especially around evolution/ratchet clauses. Both sides have got themselves into an ideological corner & are struggling to get out. Thread explaining 1/
The evolution/ratchet clause would mean that if both sides increased their levels of regulation in these areas (environmental, workers rights etc.) in the future this would become the new bar for non-regression. Helping to avoid a gap opening up between the two sides. 2/
Both sides have adopted very ideological positions when in reality this approach makes little difference in practice. On the UK side, the approach in the original EU draft suggests this evolution could only happen if both sides agreed. i.e. UK would have a veto. 3/
Read 11 tweets
16 Oct
Don't think we should get too carried away about this being over, but message UK is sending is serious. Main thing I think EU have misjudged is sequencing on all this. UK has finally begun to move on state aid issues, instead of responding in kind EU has pushed for more 1/
Not entirely surprising. They are right further moves from UK are needed, but the way they are going about it is wrong way to achieve them. Putting all pressure on UK to move on all things difficult for it with EU leaving theirs until very end always makes it unbalanced. 2/
The EU should respond to UK moves by beginning to move on fish and opening up other areas for intense talks. If UK doesn't follow through with further moves, EU can always pull back later. 3/
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct
Building on the thread below, I've got a new piece out today on the interplay between Brexit & Covid-19, in particular in terms of practical impacts for business. A real challenge in many sectors, here's a thread setting out key points 1/ www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/gl…
As the chart below highlights, in many cases the two shocks will hit different sectors, spreading the breadth of economic challenges at the end of this year. But there are some sectors (mostly those with complex manufacturing supply chains) which will face a double hit 2/
We identify three themes where there are likely to be particular interplays between Brexit & Covid-19 for business - supply chains, people & finance/resources. 3/
Read 10 tweets
10 Sep
Have taken time to digest internal market bill & talk to various people on both sides. The text is worse than I expected & is/will be a clear breach of Protocol. Some analysis and thoughts on what happens next (spoiler - nothing particularly good)...1/
What surprised me about the clauses in the internal market bill is that not only do they seek to set out UK's interpretation of the Protocol (which might have been defensible) but they pre-emptively set out that UK will ignore any ruling on these issues. Impossible to defend 2/
Furthermore, if the UK wanted to argue that Article 6(1) of the Protocol gave it licence to do these things, it could have earlier on. Indeed I tweeted about this sort of approach in Oct 2019 but UK accepted exit declarations legally required 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!