It's coming towards the end of the year, and there are still countless people minimizing the pandemic and spreading untruths
So I thought I'd do a bit of a thread of FACTS about COVID-19 1/n
2/n Fact 1: the death rate of COVID-19 varies substantially by age, but is high even for relatively young people
For example, a 1 in 2,700 risk of death from COVID-19 for a 35 year old, based on our comprehensive paper on the topic link.springer.com/article/10.100…
3/n Fact 2: COVID-19 is MUCH more dangerous than influenza
For younger age groups, COVID-19 may be similarly lethal. For anyone over 30, it is much worse. @zorinaq has a nice graphic on this
4/n Fact 3: RT-PCR testing for COVID-19 has a very low rate of false positives. This is both conceptually demonstrable virologydownunder.com/the-false-posi…
5/n Fact 4: most deaths that are counted as COVID-19 (at least in the US and other developed nations) have COVID-19 as the "underlying" or main cause jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
6/n Fact 5: herd immunity through natural infection is not a way out of the pandemic. It will not bring us "back to normal", and certainly not within the timeframes proposed
8/n Fact 7: In the published data thus far, there is no large increase in suicide rates associated with lockdowns, although there are increases related to the pandemic itself
11/n Fact 10: there is quite a lot of evidence demonstrating that people can spread COVID-19 before becoming symptomatic, with some indication that the most infectious period is right around the onset of symptoms
13/n Fact 13: most places in the world are far below "herd immunity" numbers
We need a vaccine for community immunity!
14/n Fact 14: COVID-19 has been associated with large increases in excess mortality in many countries, including the US and much of Europe euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps
15/n Fact 15: COVID-19 is probably less deadly now than it was at the start of 2020
Fact 16: It is INCREDIBLY HARD to put a number on this difference
16/n Fact 17: The cycle threshold (Ct) of PCR testing is not some magic silver bullet against a growing epidemic. @MackayIM again has an excellent read on this here virologydownunder.com/the-false-posi…
17/n Fact 18: The comparator to government action for COVID-19 is not "business as usual", it's "widespread epidemic", and anyone who pretends otherwise is being very silly
18/n Fact 19: the corollary to Fact 18 is that a lot of the impact of lockdowns is UNCERTAIN
19/n Fact 20: Lockdowns clearly reduce COVID-19 case numbers in the short term. Other government actions can clearly limit case numbers in the long term. There are now numerous examples devex.com/news/behind-vi…
20/n (Whether this means that lockdowns "work" depends on your definition of "work" and "lockdowns", but in general it seems fair to say that COVID-19 can clearly be controlled through coordinated government responses)
21/n Fact 21: COVID-19 is the third leading cause of death for 2020 in the United States
In the last few months of the year, it may have overtaken other causes of death to become THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH FOR >30 year olds
22/n Fact 22: We still do not fully know the long-term chronic impacts of COVID-19, but they are likely to impact a non-trivial portion of the people who get the disease nature.com/articles/d4158…
23/n Fact 23: This is something of a repetition of Fact 4, but just to clarify that the evidence is clear that most people who are classified as having died of COVID-19 did indeed die of the disease
24/n Fact 24: Another corollary, this time to Facts 9 and 10 - since many people are asymptomatic when testing positive (even though the majority will go on to develop symptoms) isolating PCR+ cases is simply good public health policy
25/n Fact 25: opioid-related mortality has been rising in the US for some time, and while it may have been exacerbated due to the pandemic it is inaccurate to ascribe all overdoses to lockdowns/COVID-19 cdc.gov/media/releases…
26/n Fact 26: While COVID-19 deaths only made up 40% of all excess deaths in young people in the U.S., it is likely that this is due to undercapture of the COVID-19 burden in this population (i.e. much of the remaining 60% is COVID-19 related as well) jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
27/n Fact 27: Much of the economic and social disruption that people have experienced this year is due to THE PANDEMIC ITSELF and not necessarily government action
28/n Fact 28: During lockdown, New Zealand's death excess deaths DROPPED. The NZ total excess deaths for the year are below usual, in contrast to other countries with large epidemics thelancet.com/journals/lance…
29n Fact 29: The average life expectancy for an 80-year-old person alive today in the United Kingdom is 9.12 years. The average death rate from COVID-19 for this group is ~8.5% ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
30/n Fact 30: The UK has had a very large increase in excess mortality this year, orders of magnitude higher than in an average bad influenza season
31/n Fact 31: COVID-19 reinfections occur. While we do not know the exact rate as of yet, and it may be very low, as time goes on the rate is likely to rise
Disagreement over science should not consist of personal attacks
That is not an excuse for uncritically accepting all bad science, nor for refusing to critique things that are clearly flawed
Many people have taken my criticisms of Ioannidis' papers, for example, to be some sort of horrifying vendetta, even though I've never once said anything bad about the man himself
The problem is that some people see any criticism of senior academics by their juniors as impolite and disrespectful, and therefore a personal attack
I've been tangentially watching this critique by @ikashnitsky of another worrying paper in JAMA Psych, so I thought I'd briefly discuss my own thoughts on the paper in a bit of twitter peer-review 1/n
2/n Paper is here, it looks at suicide rates in Maryland during 2020, and finds that there are racial disparities in these rates. In particular, there were fewer White individuals dying of suicide during lockdown, but more Black people died this way jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
3/n @ikashnitsky and one of the authors have had a fantastic back-and-forth, and I strongly recommend you read the threads here:
Wow, 15 locally-acquired cases in NSW. So 23-30-15
That's a huge relief for Sydney, although we won't know for sure if the outbreak is controlled for a few days yet #covidnsw#nswcovid
For those who made fun of the "gold standard", I'd be interested to know of anywhere in the world that ramped up testing by 8x and went from R(t) ~1.4 to R(t)<~1 in THREE DAYS
38,000 tests in one day. That's 5 tests for every 1,000 people in the state in 24 hours!
The authors of the Great Barrington nonsense have produced a website called "collateral global", claiming to document the collateral effects of COVID-19 lockdowns
I thought I'd have a look at the scholarship on display 1/n
2/n First up - suicide. I have actually looked into this subject a fair bit, and as someone with mental health issues I take a fairly personal interest in the statistics
What does this global repository say?
3/n There are currently 4 studies listed. One found no change in suicide rates, one is an opinion piece by a psychiatrist, and the other two are cross-sectional studies of suicidal ideation
This is a massive step by Twitter. If implemented across the board, it could largely shut down many denialist accounts
Some generic responses for all the people replying:
- Twitter is a private company. They do not owe you the right to their platform to spread misinformation
- This is preventing lies about one, specific thing, you can still lie about other things
- if this makes you want to leave Twitter, it makes no sense to reply to this tweet - deleting your account is a much more logical step
2/n Note: these are all from published or preprinted research, and I'm directly screenshotting so you can read the words for yourself
3/n Back in May, from the original preprint of the IFR paper medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
"the worldwide IFR of COVID-19...may be in the same ballpark as...influenza (0.1%, 0.2% in a bad year)"
This was a mistake (the IFR of flu is not 0.1-0.2%)