I spoke via Zoom last night at the Beijing Forum 2020: COVID-19 Shock to Global Health and Development.
I retold the story of Reagan and Gorbachev and their private walk around Lake Geneva in 1985. As the story is told, Reagan asks Gorbachev if he would come to the defense of the USA upon the invasion of aliens from outer space and Gorbachev says, “Yes, of course.”
Gorbachev asks the same of Reagan and gets the same response. The two leaders then agree to collaborate in defense of all of humanity.
Invasions of aliens from outer space is the stuff of fantasy and fiction. Invasion of microbes from our planet into our bodies is our current reality.
This pandemic threat we have been living with for the past year is as close to reality comes to a common threat that transcends international boarders, transcends political systems and nations, without any kind of a human boundary.
Like the hypothetical invasion, this reminds us of our common humanity and demands a collective response.
COVID-19 can’t be contained any place, unless it is contained every place.
In an increasingly interdependent world there is no walling off for a long period of time of a contagious microbe like COVID-19.
This is as profound a challenge we have ever faced for the capacity for international cooperation. The stakes are immense.
In a JAMA paper with @Cutler_econ, we suggested the costs of this pandemic are $16 trillion to the US economy, suggesting as much as $75-$80 trillion to the global economy.
The longer this disease circulates at this scale, the greater the possibility of mutation and the risk of a more deadly variance.
There is no more responsible or moral course than the kind of intense cooperation that Reagan and Gorbachev had in mind. Yet we haven't seen the intense cooperation at the government level in the economic or health realm.
The collective effort has been small compared to the separate, domestic efforts.
If there is to be a successful, strong and effective global collective effort in respect to the pandemic threat, it will depend on the USA and China more than any other two countries. Can we set aside our differences to meet the basic health of our citizens and humanity?
I suggested three challenges.
First, financing that assumes the rapid availability to vaccinate everyone on the planet by the end of 2022. This is not an act of charity from rich to poor countries. This is an act of forward defense of national self interest.
Second, the commitment of the global community to restore the convergence trend of developing countries and industrial countries.
Third, the establishment of an effective global capacity to meet the next pandemic.
These are challenges that can be met. This generation, as preoccupied as it is with so many valid concerns, can muster a spirit of global cooperation. There is no more important act--as history will judge it--than China and the USA cooperating together to meet this challenge.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The big fiscal news is that the nation will not make the colossal error of letting stimulus lapse. That would have been hugely risky and ill advised.
But the set of compromises reached and not reached are-- in important respects--bizarre and unfortunate. This does not bode well
The lack of support for state and local government will mean hundreds of thousands more without work, more crime, more fires, and more kids falling behind. The business liability issue is in comparison a triviality that should have been compromised.
The business meals deduction that has been put back in may be the dumbest tax provision enacted in the last decade which, given the 2017 Act, is a strong statement. It make even the break for carried interest look good.
The U.S. is in danger of losing its dominant leadership position in global financial services, writes Henry M. Paulson Jr. wsj.com/articles/china… via @WSJ
1/ Budget deficit reduction is not a priority issue for the next few years given secular stagnation as @jasonfurman and I explain (brookings.edu/events/fiscal-… ). Nor are there strong reasons to worry about budget sustainability.
2/ Other deficits—with respect to infrastructure, investment in children, and innovation—pose much greater threats to our children and our national security than money borrowed for decades at rates close to 1 percent in a currency we print ourselves.
1/ In Tax Notes today, former IRS Commissioner Charles Rossotti, @NatashaRSarin and I outline how the next Admin can collect more than $1 trillion in a highly progressive way:
Making people pay the taxes that they already owe. taxnotes.com/featured-analy…
2/We've previously written independently on the need for a robust attack on the tax gap.
Here, we come together to lay out a roadmap for change, calling for more audits, tech improvements & third party reporting that will help IRS collect taxes due but unpaid, disprop by the $$$
3/ Our program would raise enough to fund important policy initiatives that will help those who need it most:
Could more than double the EITC or SNAP; or fund universal pre-K and paid leave programs.
Following the great appointment of Janet Yellen, the Biden Administration is assembling a super economic team. This group will be laser focused on middle class prosperity, inequality and discrimination and addressing climate change. They will make a big difference for America.
I have known Ceci Rouse since she was student of mine @Harvard in 80s. She is a deeply serious researcher in the economics of education & inequality. She stood out in the Obama Admin & has been a great Dean. Her integrity will be a big asset for the CEA, Pres Biden & our country.
My friend @neeratanden is a force of nature. Her strength as a communicator is exceeded only by the strength of her convictions. No one works harder, with more of a sense of purpose. She will bring new thinking about government budgeting to the OMB that this moment demands.
1/During a financial crisis, @USTreasury Sec Paulson understood in transition it was his job to help the Fed and the incoming Admin establish a basis for strong, cooperative efforts to contain the crisis. Sec.Mnuchin has done just the opposite. wsj.com/articles/mnuch…
2/In these complex times, there is room for debate on what types of government intervention in credit markets are appropriate.
There's not much room for debate on the merits of maintaining stanbdy capacities.
3/ We cannot predict when or if a panicky cascade will happen in credit markets. Aftershocks after financial crises (and earthquakes) are not uncommon. Removing a capacity to respond as @stevenmnuchin1 has sought to do is wrong.
Told @FareedZakaria on GPS @CNN, America’s failure on COVID-19 is almost unimaginable. Heck, if the U.S. had handled the pandemic as well as Pakistan, we would have saved in neighborhood of $10 trillion.
The costs of an expanded testing system are trivial compared to the costs of tens of thousands of early deaths. Expanding testing should be a matter of utmost urgency.
Interest rates are essentially zero, telling us that the funds are available and won’t crowd out anything important. Instead it will push economy forward. All the dangers are on spending too little, not too much.