It’s midnight & feeling a little 1999-ish right now. It's a different flavor today of course but when it starts looking easy on the long side that usually means it's actually pretty treacherous out there ✈️📰📈☠️ (1/x)
That being said, shorting clearly over-valued/over-hyped small to medium sized companies can be deadly as well. Timing can make all the difference in the world
This brings me to Skymall. It used to be a publicly traded small cap HQ'd in Phoenix. It was a quirky mail order catalogue that sat in the back seat pocket of airline seats
Flyers would browse, rip out a page of something they wanted (or keep the whole thing) and order when they landed - there was no wifi on board back then!!
The shares were very cheap on the numbers and after I met the CEO I starting buying at something like $6/$7 a share sometime in late 1998/early 1999
The stock traded up and I started selling at $9/$10. It was a fairly mundane business with limited opportunities for growth so as it rallied to $12 I started shorting a bit. It kept going higher so I sold some more at $15 and $20
There came a point in 1999 when press releases that mentioned the word 'internet' would move company shares much like words such as 'exclusive sports content' or 'electric vehicles' or 'EV SPAC' are doing right now
Skymall had figured out this phenomenon earlier than most companies and certainly way earlier than me
I kept the short position fairly small but when Skymall's 'internet' press release came out the shares absolutely ripped. The business was sporting an insane valuation that made absolutely no sense but that didn't matter
After the shares more than tripled, the position was no longer so small. I stuck with it hoping for a break in the market's fever. Well of course the shares more then doubled from there reaching over $100 which was about 7x my cost
As the valuation went vertical and became ever more untethered to reality, other short sellers were attracted to the situation. What was easy to borrow suddenly became hard to borrow and of course suddenly my prime broker was scrambling to maintain the short
Several times I got the call to cover at the highs. I managed to stave the calls off for a period while I waited for the market to break which it finally did for a period before the big crash in March of 2000
I ended up covering at around $30 which was a lot better than $100 but it was a nasty hit for such a small commitment
It's difficult to understand this kind of pain. It's the kind of lesson that can't really be taught in the classroom. It has to be experienced to be fully understood and Skymall was my MBA in watching your back when shorting
In the end, Skymall went private at something like $2/$3 a share. I was scarred for life but in a way that has served me well ever since
There's lots of craziness out there right now and perhaps we're getting close to the next real correction but remember that shorting at insane valuations can still get you killed even if you are 100% right about the ultimate value of the business

(fin)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mario Cibelli

Mario Cibelli Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mario_cibelli

24 Nov
I don't have a view on $SFIX's coming quarterly results but I've been thinking more about dynamics that may, over time, help drive improved financial results for the company
The apparel recommendation feed for direct buy seems perfectly suited for sponsored listings at one point. This kind of optimization may be a ways off for Stitch but promoted brands/pieces would flow very naturally from the current version of the feed
There's no reason to believe that Stitch couldn't make a nice margin from brands seeking promotion on its platform
Read 9 tweets
22 Nov
One of the harder things in investing for me is dealing with a contrarian investment thesis at the outset that becomes significantly less so over time
A minority point of view that transitions to more of a consensus view typically means the market is willing to pay more for the same opportunity that was originally spotted
The payoff for being correct changes and with a consistent end state, the risk vs reward attractiveness has gotten worse mathematically. This can make it tempting reduce such an investment
Read 4 tweets
10 Oct
I did some thinking this week and wanted to put into words a topic I've thought about again recently pertaining to many of the growth/challenger companies I’ve visited over the years.
When a new model is being pursued to serve an existing market, the problems that need to solved and the bottlenecks that manifest may be completely different than what incumbents experience.
A challenger company with a slightly different twist to its service/offering may, over time, magnify these differences so that in effect it is pursuing a completely different business than incumbents.
Read 8 tweets
30 Sep
Tweet thread IV is about WWE, a company I've been following since the early 2000s. Over that time period there have been a handful of occasions where the share price veered too far from intrinsic value. Now may be one of those times.

🤼‍♂️ 🎤💪🏼®️🅰️W (1/x)
I apologize in advance for the length of this thread but there’s a lot to parse out & distill. All that follows is opinion, not investment advice.
I'm guessing everyone knows this business already. If not, watch Raw or Smackdown and you'll get it --- sports entertainment. It's a soap opera for men --- yes women watch the shows too.
Read 76 tweets
23 Sep
I think this is 5 trades for 1-800 Contacts since leaving the public markets. Earnings have to be up materially since going private.
It’s going to take some time for me to add to my story of this rule breaker but mixed into all this is a fascinating case study of public vs private professional ownership.
1-800 captured much more value for its owners as a private entity than a public one and at some level that is unfortunate
Read 4 tweets
18 Sep
Tweet storm III is about company HQ'd in Salt Lake City and a CEO that accomplished something nearly impossible. The outcome changed the way contact lenses were sold in America.

👁👁👓📞🩺🏔 (1/x)
It was a fascinating journey and I'll tell you up front that there are some interesting parallels between this company and modern day rule breakers such as Uber.
It’s a long story so I’m going to break it up into two or three parts over the coming months. I’ll do my best to tell it fairly & accurately.
Read 47 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!