I did an entire thread on this, but Mr. Veggie Tales is wrong.
The article he links to sanitizes the commitments of CRT in ways which are, I think, misleading.
2/ The article whitewashes the use of postmodernism, and the actual beliefs of CRT scholars.
I outline the beliefs of CRT scholars using their own words here:
4/ When, and not if, but when the postmodernism takes over the thing that goes is the doctrine.
One day I'll do a thread on how Brian McLaren and a lot of the others played fast and loose with the truth to make headway in Christian circles, until I have time to do that...
5/ If you want to have a "high view of the Bible" get rid of CRT and postmodernism. If you don't, by the time those 2 things are done your churches will teach that the Nicene creed and Westminster confessions are evil tools of patriarchal oppression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My problem isnt with conservstives like @MattWalshBlog who disagree. My problem is with those...
Who play both sides and change their public stance to fit the fashion of the day.
@BethMooreLPM is a weathervane. When gay marriage wasn't popular she was trying to "free people from homosexuality" now it is popluar so she deletes that passage from her book.
1/ The postmodernism of the Emergent Church is back. People like @kkdumez are leading the charge, and not being forthcoming about it. Ive done a thread on this before, it may be time for another thread soon.
But for now, look at the the Author @kkdumez is praising here:
2/ That author is Brian Mclaren, who was the most popular figure in the emergent church. He agreed with and spread postmodernism and postmodern thinkers and books. Here, he wrote the forward to a book called "What Would Jesus Deconstruct"
3/ If you doubt it's postmodernism:
Pic 1 is a description of "What Would Jesus Deconstruct", which says the book is postmodernism top to bottom.
Pic 2 is Brian Mclaren's book "Church on the other side: Ministry in the Postmodern Matrix," which is even more postmodernism.
I have loaded the vibe trebuchet and launched into the world a large number of bublasuars, Ivysaurs, and Venusaurs. The reason for this is not clear to me. Although I do have reasons for having done so...
Sometimes our artistic nature allows us to intuit what is coming prior to the even showing up. It is sometimes the case that there is something inside us, something deep, that only comes out by way of expression and art.
It is not always symbolic.
So the bulbasaurs are not symbolic of some ideas, they are something I felt the need to express, so I did. As odd as it sounds, like a sad person plays a song, or a happy person does a dance, I am contemplating the current social and political milieu so I tweeted bulbasaurs.
Check out this linguistic sleight of hand:
Kendi interchanges "equal" and "equitable" in his tweet. By associating "equity" with "equality" (similar words, different meanings) and using "equality" to try and justify "equity" he creates the illusion people are against *equality*
This is postcolonial theory for southern white people. This is literally the exact logic that Franz Fanon uses in black skin white masks to explain the plight of African Americans after the end of slavery...
Replace the word *conquer* with the word *enslave* and this is something Franz Fanon could have written:
"On the cultural front, how much of that caving is due to being an *enslaved* people conditioned into accepting imposed guilt and living with the memory of the *enslaving*?"
The *reasoning* here is bad. The *reasoning* is the problem.
Arguing that society conditioned southerners to fold by invoking the memory of losing the civil war is pretty much arguing that the south suffers from "internalized oppression."