RULING ON CELEBRATING, WISHING AND GIFTING KĀFIRS ON THEIR FESTIVALS

Shaykh Badruddīn Maĥmūd al-Sīmāwī al-Ĥanafī [d. 823 AH / 1420 CE] writes in Jāmiý al-Fuşūlayn:

❝Abū Bakr ibn Ţarkhān stated:

❛Whoever left towards Suddah (Álī al-Qārī said that it means a gathering of
the people of Kufr) has committed Kufr, as in it there is an announcement of Kufr, and it is as if he has helped in it (i.e. Kufr). Upon the qiyās of Suddah, going out on Nayrūz and doing as they do on that day is Kufr.❞

This is also mentioned in Minaĥ al-Rawđ al-Az’har.
Mujaddid Alf Thānī Imām Rabbānī Aĥmad al-Fārūqī al-Sirhindī al-Naqshbandī al-Ĥanafī [971-1034 AH / 1564-1634 CE] writes in one of his Maktūbāt:

❝And honouring the respected days of the Hindus and in those days enacting the known rituals of Hindus also accentuates Shirk
necessitates (the ruling of) Kufr; as on the Diwālī of Kāfirs, Jāhil Muslims (i.e. Muslims by name only), especially their womenfolk, gleefully enact their rituals and celebrate it as their Eid; and gift like the Kāfirs gift, they send their daughters and sisters gifts,
and colour their pots during these days like the Kāfirs do, and fill them up with red-coloured rice and send to each other, and especially trust and respect these days – this is all Shirk and Kufr from Dīn-i-Islām.❞

[Maktūbāt, Volume 3, Letter 41]
Állāmah Muĥammad Álāuddīn al-Ĥaşkafī al-Ĥanafī [1025-1028 AH / 1616-1677 CE] writes in Durr al-Mukhtār:

❝It is not permissible to give gifts in the name of Nayrūz and Mihrijān, meaning that giving and receiving gifts in the name of both these days is Ĥarām.
If it is done with the intention of honouring it (i.e. the day of festival), like the Mushrikīn do, then he has committed Kufr.

Abū Ĥafş al-Kabīr said: ❛If a man worshipped Allāh for 50 years then he gifted an egg to a Mushrik on the day of Nayrūz intending to honour that day,
then indeed he has committed Kufr and his deeds are lost.❜❞

This is also mentioned in Baĥr ar-Rāyiq, Fatāwā al-Hindiyyah and Jāmiý al-Fuşūlayn.
Muftī e Aáżam e Holland Mawlānā Muftī Ábdul Wājid Nayyar al-Qādirī al-Ĥanafī [1352-1439 AH / 1934-2018 CE] writes in Fatāwā e Europe:

❝It is Ĥarām for Muslims to decorate their houses with what those people (Kāfirs) do, during their festivals. Then to give them gifts on this
date, and to receive gifts from them is also Ĥarām and prohibited. If the intention is to honour Christmas Day, then this (máādhAllāh) is Kufr.

It is in Durr e Mukhtār and Raddu'l Muĥtār:

❛It is not permissible to give gifts in the name of Nayrūz and Mihrijān, meaning that
giving and receiving gifts in the name of both these days is Ĥarām. If it is done with the intention of honouring it [i.e. the festival], like the Mushrikīn do, then he has committed Kufr.❜

As with gifting, exchanging congratulations [i.e. Merry Christmas] is also Ĥarām and
impermissible, from which it is necessary for Muslims to refrain.❞

A good summary of these rulings is mentioned by Ábdullāh al-Mujaddidī al-Naqshbandī:

❝Please safeguard your faiths and do not be carried away to hell in a handbasket, along with the zindiiq perennialist sufis.
No true Ahlus Sunnah Sufi master has ruled it permissible (or worse yet, recommended) to wish the kafirs on their festivals or to offer them gifts to honor their festivals.

According to Muslim fuqahaa, visiting their christmas gatherings and parades is haram, if done for
entertainment, or mere sightseeing. It makes one a kafir if done with the intention to honor their religions, their religious days and their traditions.

The same applies to putting their signs in your homes like the christmas trees or reindeer, or teaching them to your children,
or letting your children be swayed by santa at the malls and other venues. Honoring their festivals and observing them at your own homes by exchanging gifts and so on and teaching your children to do so is absolute kufr and takes one outside of Islam.
See the rulings of our fuqahaa – even praising or lauding the traditions of the kuffaar takes one outside of Islam.❞

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ابنِ خان

ابنِ خان Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IbneKhan01

23 Dec
MENTION OF PUNJAB IN MAHABHARATA

The Mahabharata had likely reached its final form in the 4th century CE.

Punjab is referred to as “Pañcanada” (पञ्चनद) in the Sanskrit text of the Mahabharata.

Pañcanada comes from “pañca” (पञ्च), meaning five and “nada” (नद), meaning river.
The term Punjab is a compound of the Farsi words, “panj” (پنج), meaning five and “āb” (آب), meaning water. The Farsi term is thus a calque of the Sanskrit word Pañcanada.

We observe this word being used in Book 2, Sabha Parva, Chapter 29: ImageImage
This passage mentions the lands conquered by Nakula, the fourth of the five Pandava brothers. Of those lands, one is Pañcanada.

Once more, we see reference to Pañcanada, in Book 5, Udyoga Parva, Chapter 19, in the description of the multitude of the army of Kauravas: ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
12 Dec
NAJDĪ DISTORTION OF THE SHĀFIÝĪ POSITION

From this it would seem that according to Imām Shāfiýī and Imām Nawawī, any and all buildings over graves must be demolished and it is impermissible to construct over them.

However, this is incorrect.
Rather, the Shāfiýī position is that it is Makrūh if done in land one owns, and it is Ĥarām if done in land that one does not own.

Imām Nawawī himself states this, before quoting Imām Shāfiýī. He writes:

❝As for building over it, then if it is in the ownership
of the one who builds, then it is Makrūh, and if it is in a waqfī graveyard then it is Ĥarām.❞

This is according to the agreement of all four Mad’habs; that it is impermissible to build over graves in the waqfī graveyards as this prevents others from their right of burial.
Read 11 tweets
26 Nov
PERMISSIBILITY OF BUILDING AROUND THE GRAVES OF THE RIGHTEOUS

Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] wrote, as recorded in Fatāwā al-Riđawiyyah:

❝The Ayimmah e Dīn [Imāms of the religion] held it permissible to construct a building ImageImageImage
around the mazārāt [graves] of the respected Úlamā’a and Mashāyikh قدست اسرارهم (may Allāh sanctify their secrets) on land with permissible disposal, with the purpose that visitors and beneficiaries may find rest [in them]. They made clear that the reason behind the prohibition
is [when there is] an evil intention or absence of benefit, thus where there is a praiseworthy intention and benefit is present, then the prohibition falls away. Analysis of circumstances and noble research in this matter is that if the building is built first and then burial
Read 39 tweets
7 Nov
ORIGIN OF WAHĀBISM?

Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] received a query from Madrasah e Ahl e Sunnat, Bāzār Dīwān, Murādābād, sent by Maulavi Abu’l Masúūd Ábdu’l Wadūd Sahib, Ţālib e Ílm [student of knowledge], on 1st Jamād al-Ūlā
1336 AH:

Which sect is Wahābī, which are common, and where is their origin from, and what are their beliefs, and what has come in the Ĥadīth in their matter?

The answer:

Wahābī is a faithless sect, which burns at the honouring of those beloved to Allāh and wishes to erase
their remembrance and honouring by various sorts of stratagems. Its origin is from Iblīs Laýīn [accursed], that Allāh ázza wa jall gave the command to honour Sayyidunā Ādam عليہ الصلاة والسلام and that Malúūn did not accept. And in the time of Islām Dhu’l Khuwayşarah Tamīmī
Read 14 tweets
6 Nov
IS IT VALID TO BELIEVE ALLĀH IS LOCATED ON THE ÁRSH?

Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] was sent by Ţālib Álī Sahib on 15th Jamād al-Ūlā 1336 AH:

To consider the Dhāt of Bārī [the Creator] táālā to be only on the Ársh and not to Image
consider any creation of Allāh, other than above the Ársh, to be encompassing the Dhāt of Bārī táālā, but rather to say that only the Divine knowledge encompasses all things and his Dhāt is solely on the Ársh, and not in another place. Is this belief that of Ahl e Sunnat or
not? And the one who believes this, is it permissible or not to pray behind him? And also explain this, that people attribute this belief to the Ĥanābilah, is this truly the belief of the Ĥanābilah or not? To consider the Dhāt of Allāh to be on the Ársh, without expressing the
Read 25 tweets
5 Nov
WAS ALAHAZRAT SUPPORTIVE OF BRITISH RULE?

Since they cannot refute the writings of the Imām, they feel the need to cast false accusations against him. Anybody who has read the writings of the Imām would know he hated Kāfirs, especially the British, and did not support them.
Mawlānā Arshad al-Qādirī [1343-1422/1925-2002] was a famous debator, prolific author, prominent activist and educationist. He wrote in the foreword to Sawāniĥ Imām Aĥmad Riđā by Shaykh Badruddīn Aĥmad:

“Often, I have challenged those who try to clean the dirt upon their faces by
trying to wipe it with the mantle of Alahazrat, to show us proof for their claims; regardless of such proofs in the books of his admirers or in those of his adversaries. Show us a single instance where Alahazrat was invited by any officer of the British government; or that any
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!