RingCentral is one of the great quiet successful stories in SaaS, growing from an SMB-focused phone solution to a $35B+ enterprise leader
What are 5 things we can learn from RingCentral, looking back at when it crossed $1B in ARR?
#1. RingCentral was still growing 34% at $1B in ARR ... and that's despite very strong competition, from Five9 to Talkdesk to up-and-comers like Dialpad and more.
No one has 50%+ market share here, yet RingCentral could still grow 34% at $1B in ARR
#2. RingCentral got the "channel" to work. This doesn't work for everyone in the early days, but if you can get someone else to sell your product for you ... it can really work. See also Hubspot + Atlassian.
Channel sales grew 80% at $1B ARR, driving 18% of revenue
#3. RingCentral was slow to go global, unlike most in SaaS. Less than 10% of its revenue was international at $1B in ARR.
There are reasons telcom is harder to scale global, but still, it shows you pick your battles.
#4. RingCentral started off very, very SMB. At $1B ARR, they had just closed their first 8-figure TCV deal.
So sometimes you go upmarket fast. Sometimes you get there in a few years, like Slack. Sometimes you wait more than a decade.
#5: At $1B in ARR, 40% of its new bookings came from >existing< customers.
Let that sink in. Let how important upsell, retention, and high NRR is really sink in.
Without that 40% boost, RingCentral would be a shadow of what it is.
It used to be you basically had two options to make money as a founder:
* hope for an IPO many years down the road.
* Or maybe get acquired by a handful of BigCos.
Today, startups have so many more options for founder liquidity:
#1. Secondary liquidity in any hot A-B-C-D+ round
Secondary liquidity is now commonplace in any hot round with a Big Fund in it.
This means you can make at least a million or two dollars in just a few years if you build something meaningful, without selling your company
#2. Acquisition by a competitor
This used to be a bummer, but with 400+ unicorns today and so many decacorns, your competitor can now buy you for hundreds of millions or more down the road
This often makes sense to consolidate #1 position in market
If you are bootstrapped in SaaS, it helps a lot to be SMB focused, viral and/or truly product-led growth
Why?
Sales.
Venture-backed startups just can >afford< to invest so, so much more in sales.
With the average SaaS enterprise/B2D/mid-market leader seeing net revenue retention of 120%-130%, or even higher, it just >pays< to invest heavily in sales if you have the $$$
The lifetime of a customer is often well in excess of 5x the first-year ACV, sometimes 10x
So paying sales reps 30%, 50%, or even more of the first-year ACV can still pay
But when bootstrapped, it's really hard to pay much more than 20% of the total ACV in sales comp. That often means a 10% commission.
VC-backed startups can just pay up here, and should