The AstraZeneca boss says they have new data for "the winning formula" that shows as good a result as Tozinameran (BNT/Pfizer) & Moderna. Based on what we know so far, is that likely? Well, yes...and no... 1/6 thetimes.co.uk/article/covid-…
...Protocol for their pooled analysis of trials had 2 analyses, dependent on reaching set events (people sick with Covid-19 more than 2 weeks after 2nd dose) in the standard-standard dose group: 53 events for the 1st analysis, 105 for the "final"... 2/6 marlin-prod.literatumonline.com/pb-assets/Lanc…
..We've seen 1st analysis: 98 events in that group. So they only needed a few more events to get to final of 105. Vaccine efficacy in that group was 62·1% (95% CI 41·0–75·7): with upper bound 75.7%, small data increase unlikely to get them over 90% ...3/6 thelancet.com/journals/lance…
...So how about low-dose-first? That was 90·0% (67·4–97·0), so sure, that could get easily get to the mid-90s: it was just 3 vs 30 events, so wouldn't take much to tip it over. BUT... look at that range of uncertainty (<70%-97%) & look at the other 2 ⬇️: can't reach *that*... 4/6
... But say that's what he's talking about - that accidental subgroup going over 90%. (a) That's not news - it was clearly possible. (b) It doesn't solve all the problems with that new untested hypothesis (Summed up here)... 5/6 absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2020/12/20/why…
... Consider how Turkey's Sinovac announcement has been dissed:
91.3%: from 29 events in 1,322 people.
Oxford's original much-celebrated accidental group in 1st analysis?
PS: I'm assuming in above thread that US results haven't arrived a month earlier than expected: reuters.com/article/us-hea… I discuss reasons I think we won't know about this vaccine till then in my recent post - they'll be the 1st placebo-controlled results absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2020/12/20/why…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
MHRA verdict reportedly coming any day for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. I've been asked if I think their process is comparable to FDA's. Good question, post-Brexit. So I looked at 3 regulator reports for Tozinameran (BNT/Pfizer): FDA, MHRA, EMA (Europe) ...1/6
...2 agencies have unequivocal advantages:
1) Only the EMA did manufacturing inspections, which is a very big deal;
2) FDA had greater transparency: they're the only 1 releasing manufacturer briefing, released reports pre-committee, live-streamed committee discussion ...2/6
... FDA assessment report: 92 pages, almost all clinical data/issues, extensive data analysis - released days before their decision;
MHRA: 51 pages, not as much analysis - released 2 weeks after decision;
EMA: 140 pages, extensive data analysis, wide coverage ...3/6
..Efficacy data is for 27,817 people randomized to either vaccine or placebo; & there's safety data for 30,350 people. I'll get started with the adverse events data, because that has been a question mark for this vaccine...2/n
...The FDA raises lymphadenopathy & Bell's palsy again. More people with lymphadenopathy with Moderna's vaccine than BNT/Pfizer's: 173 in vaccine group, 95 in placebo. Bell's palsy similar. Frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) low: 1.0% in vaccine & placebo arms...3/n
#tbt This is the dedication, with Eleanor Roosevelt, for the Polio Hall of Fame, honoring 17 scientists critical to polio research & the vaccine. The only woman scientist is in the center. She's Isabel Morgan (1911-1996) ... 1/5 asm.org/Articles/2019/…
...Morgan cracked 2 major barriers that made the Salk vaccine possible: identified 3 serotypes for polio that needed to be protected against. Then in preclinical studies, she showed inactivated vaccine could work if you added adjuvant & a booster shot ...2/5
...These are her parents, both geneticists. She's Lilian Vaughan Morgan, a pioneer in using Drosophila as a model, revealing some of its chromosomes en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilian_Va…
...Mystery #1 - why Indian phase 3 trial isn't included - isn't solved. They report only that they have trials in UK, Brazil, SA & Kenya (Kenyan data not included). Trials in the US, Japan & Russia also not mentioned... 2/n
...Ah...in the statistical analysis plan, they describe the 4 studies as Oxford-sponsored. The trials that aren't mentioned presumably aren't. Given there was a serious adverse event in the Indian trial in October, this raises issues... 3/n marlin-prod.literatumonline.com/pb-assets/Lanc…
The FDA will start releasing phase 3 trial data on Covid vaccine any moment now & a media deluge will start! Tips on what to watch out for | My latest @WIREDwired.com/story/new-vacc…
This is utterly appalling. The manufacturer of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine in India, @SerumInstIndia, is *suing* the trial participant who lodged a claim for compensation after experiencing a serious adverse event for damage to their reputation thehindu.com/news/national/… ... 1/2
..The trial participant has the right to sue for compensation. While the company is denying the severe event was vaccine-related, they are not denying it happened, contradicting previous statements eg "zero hospitalisation" livemint.com/science/health… & hindustantimes.com/videos/htls/si… 2/3
...Recap: trials of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine were put on pause for investigation by regulators the other 2 times there was a severe adverse event (SAE) - standard practice. This participant was in intensive care & we're only hearing about it because he sued... 3/4