Thread by @Usherwood

Another TCA graphic for you, on how to resolve disputes

1/

Short version is that this is very much the same as the model in the WA (and in other FTAs), but with some important caveats

2/

(if you want to compare with the WA version, try this:

https://twitter.com/Usherwood/status/1305416334814085120?s=20

)

3/

First big change from WA mode, is removal of any referral to CJEU on points on EU law.

This was a big UK ask, so allows them the headline

I leave it to #LawTwitter to explain how you ensure congruence of tribunal rulings with EU law

4/

Second big change is the long list of exceptions.

WA had none, but here we're got ones for goods, bits of LPF, law enforcement and data sharing/transmission

Each of which is a big thing

5/

Processes in these other areas varies a lot, often to be much softer (e.g. taxation LPF (

https://twitter.com/StevePeers/status/1342845153585848323?s=20

)), so do check when trying to work out enforceability

6/

Thirdly, this process doesn't allow for financial penalties (which WA did), do it's all down to 'suspension of obligations', which can cross TCA chapters

7/

tl;dr tread carefully in the DSM element of all of this and don't think that removal of CJEU will make it all plain sailing for UK politicos

/end