This means they are thinking for themselves too little.
Mini-🧵 » 1/11
Let's try to agree that "note-taking" is more about "consuming" than "conversing" or "creating". 2/
The opposite is "note-making". It is more about "conversing" with ideas and "creating" unique perspectives from the ideas encountered. It is not about "consuming". 3/
Consuming is more passive than active. Being passive in thought...let's call that poor, surface-level thinking. 4/
Conversing and Creating are more active than passive. Being active in thought...let's call that good thinking. 5/
Most people will sheepishly agree they are doing more consuming than they really need.
This means they are spending more time thinking poorly, and less time thinking "goodly".
What's the problem? 6/
Note-takers—people who consume way too much—lose their ability to think for themselves.
Their thinking muscles atrophy. 7/
The process of note-MAKING rebuilds and strengthens our thinking muscles. What is note-making? 8/
Note-making is taking ideas you encounter and chewing on them, relating them to other ideas, challenging them, refining them, combining them, and otherwise developing and growing them into something special: your personalized thoughts and opinions surrounding the idea. 9/
That's the superpower that obsessive note-takers can't touch. 10/
Just like directing your "Attention" is the superpower in the digital age, so is "Note-Making" the superpower in the Age of the Linked Note. 11/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No, links weren't created yesterday. But now regular people have the ability to link their thoughts in a reliable way. This is profoundly important.
Mini-🧵 (1/7)
In this case, regular people are not early-adopters, programmers, and salivating tech-futurists. Most regular people aren't trying to parse out the mysteries of networks. They just want a reliable place to grow their thoughts. (2/7)
Why is having a reliable place to grow notes so important? GROUNDEDNESS. (3/7)
As I've asked elsewhere: How is 2 hours of bolding and highlighting the words of someone else more valuable than 2 hours writing and developing your own nuanced perspective to the ideas you encounter? 1/