1/ Newsletter owned by Advance Publications (Condé Nast) publishes a meandering slam of businesses like Substack that enable writers to create their own newsletters.
Writers owning their business and controlling their own lives = bad for democracy? Nope! newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
2/ News (e.g., the mayor took bribes) is non rival and non excludable. Selling news if not to Bloomberg terminals is near impossible.
"few newsletters publish original reporting; the majority offer personal writing, opinion pieces, research, and analysis"
Like the New Yorker!
3/ WTF is this from the post in the New Yorker newsletter:
"Substack obviously wants to call it a democratizing gesture, which I find a little bit specious. It’s the democracy of neoliberal self-empowerment."
Is it investigative journalism? Is it news? You can't sell news.
1/ Quick thread before my turkey goes in the oven.
You are Ben Ronson and you publish a newsletter called "Stradeckery" about strategy. Thousands of people pay you $10 month to subscribe.
Bundler says: "Publish through us Ben since X, Y and Z."
What is X let alone Y and Z?
2/ Does the bundler have all the elements needed to be a successful multi-sided market?
Does the bundler solve a hard coordination problem that Ben can't solve on his own? 25iq.com/2016/10/22/a-d…
3/ What does Ben give up if he lets the bundler own the direct relationship with the customer and the data from that relationship? 25iq.com/2018/06/02/pro…
Remember: You are Ben (the creator) not a consumer whining about paying for so many subscriptions or the bundler.
1/ 1994 was a miracle year of my life I said in a podcast recently. McCaw Cellular was sold in 1993. The Information Highway plan was about to die an unexpected death replaced by an Internet that had commercial value. The shift to the Internet was obvious only after the fact.
2/ “The decision to put money into the Internet in 1994 was considered by many of my colleagues to be borderline insane. Most people said things like, The Internet is free; you can’t make money on that!" Marc Andreessen
3/ The sale of McCaw Cellular to AT&T in 1993 meant Jim Barksdale and Peter Currie went to Netscape. Craig McCaw was talking to Jim Clark who said: “What I recognized after talking to Marc Andreessen was that the Web was to networks in 1994 what the PC was to computing in 1982.”
1/ I've heard Craig McCaw say many times: "wireless radio spectrum is like invisible money."
When you have more spectrum you don't need to spend as much on infrastructure. One can be a substitute for the other. Not all spectrum is equally valuable tho. wsj.com/articles/5g-au…
2/ Wireless is about tradeoffs. For example, low band radio frequencies have better propagation, but have less hertz to transmit bits. Higher frequencies are the reverse. Mid-band frequencies are, well, in the middle. Do you know what higher prices in this auction indicate?
3/ If you look at that picture in the first tweet you should think: "That infrastructure looks spendy because it requires real cash money." Having spectrum helping you avoid that cost is worth buying at auction. The more spendy the infrastructure, the more valuable spectrum is.
"Did Shkreli ask you for advice on his romantic relationship?" is a question I'm seeing a lot tonight in DMs and texts.
Strategy is of little use in affairs of the heart. But as Charlie Munger says, its wise to avoid experiences like bad marriages or racing trains to crossings.
"A realization hit her. In the visitors’ room, “I told Martin I loved him,” Smythe says. “And he told me he loved me, too.” She asked if she could kiss him, and he said yes. The room smelled of chicken wings, she remembers." elle.com/life-love/a350…
It is more likely I would be asked for advice on a topic like this:
"Shkreli mused about running for office or starting a podcast when he got out.“
Starting a podcast is far too hard.
Running for political office only requires clearing a very low hurdle. Weak competitors!