New SARS-CoV-2 variant will outrun best control US states achieved in 2020.
W/out rapid action we'll lose race b/w vaccination & virus by much more than we are now.
Much faster vaccine rollout & spacing doses as UK is doing is urgently needed.

Thread.
Background
New variant of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in UK in Sept & spread rapidly since. Estimates suggest it is more transmissible with reproductive number R (# of cases/case) ~50% higher (see tweets in thread for details)
More details on estimates of higher R:
Variant has been detected in many countries, including in 2 states in US (CO, CA) so far. It is likely already in most states, at low (<1%) prevalence. How will this impact next 3-6 months? Likely enormously, unfortunately.
nytimes.com/2020/12/30/hea…
It's easy to say, qualitatively, that higher R will require more control to keep R<1 (i.e. infections decreasing), or higher herd immunity by vaccination or infection before R<1.
But quantitative aspect is critical & this is what I am worried about. Here's why.
If we want R<1, & new R is ~50% higher, then we have to reduce transmission of initial virus so that R is <0.66 so that R will still be <1 if variant R is 50% higher, as data suggest. Can we do that? Data suggest Europe, Asia can, but US hasn't been able to (yet).
Unlike many European countries, US has never been able to get cases to drop fast (i.e. R far below 1). Even when R<1, only just barely. Graph shows trends in whole country cases data. What about at state level?
Crude estimates from rt.live suggest that NO US STATE has had R<0.66 at any point in time since March.
Here are data from 32 states.
Here are remaining 14 states.
More rigorous calculations of R by @sbfnk et al (that sadly don't show R estimates before Oct) are slightly more hopeful for a few states recently, but holiday reporting issues makes me less confident in these estimates.
epiforecasts.io/covid/posts/na…
Note: Even states are wrong scale for analysis. Transmission occurs within communities of interacting people. US Counties (one estimate: santacruzhealth.org/HSAHome/HSADiv…) would be far better & even finer spatial scale would be best. But what can we say based on state data?
We can say that we need to reduce R more than most ever have to push R<0.66 or else new variant will spread (R>1) & lead to cases, hospitalizations & deaths rising exponentially until large fraction of pop becomes infected. This outcome is heartbreaking given new vaccines.
What CAN we do?
-Limit spread as much as possible to delay spread of variant &
-Get vaccine to as many people as fast as possible
Limiting spread requires combination of safe workplaces, support for isolating & quarantining, opportunities to facilitate safer personal choices for gathering (e.g. outdoor heated spaces in cold places).
Rapid vaccine rollout requires resources to do so. Given urgency of situation (hospitals bursting, holiday surge impending), need to vaccinate many.

Several prominent people are recognizing this urgency & re-assessing current vaccination plan of 2 doses given 21-8d apart.
@Bob_Wachter. Here he lays out why he thinks spreading out doses as UK is doing, is worth considering, despite risks:
@SRileyIDD also reasons through the issues (read replies)
Doing so does NOT come w/out risks. 2 big ones:
-Efficacy rapidly wanes w/out 2nd boost; a double worry: immunity wanes enough to allow transmission & illness
-Waning immunity facilitates virus evolution (see @edwardcholmes reply):
I'd lean towards vaccine spacing as UK is doing, but have subset w/ normal timing & collect data on efficacy to adjust strategy as needed. Also monitor viral evolution much better than we currently are in US.
Summary
-Higher transmissibility of new variant will outrun past control strategies in most places in US that couldn't get R<0.66, leading to runaway epidemic
-Maximally effective control + rapid vaccine rollout w/ increased spacing urgently needed to prevent huge loss of life
Addition:
Here's a new thread by @VirusesImmunity on impacts of spacing out 2 vaccine doses by more than 3-4 wks used in Pfizer & Moderna trials.
tl;dr She is supportive given urgency w/ spread of new variant.
Addition 2: Sadly, it looks like US won't use vaccine spacing. IMO this is a huge mistake that will lead to 10000s of avoidable deaths. I hope we'll change policy soon & hope other countries will use spacing approach to save lives.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A Marm Kilpatrick

A Marm Kilpatrick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DiseaseEcology

31 Dec 20
Hundreds of nursing home residents are dying each day due to slow vaccine rollout in SNFs.

CDC vaccine tracking page shows this huge failure.

We are failing to vaccinate the population where most deaths have occurred: nursing homes.
Thread
covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tra…
As most know, ~40% of all deaths in US (& other countries like UK) have been in nursing homes.
kff.org/policy-watch/c…
As a result, nursing home residents were put, w/ health care workers (HCW), in top priority tier for vaccination. Great! But allocating vaccines to this group did NOT magically result in shots in arms. That requires huge logistical plan. Unfortunately that plan has not gone well.
Read 13 tweets
16 Dec 20
Will vaccination reduce transmission or just disease?
Do 3 vaccines w interim or final phase 3 results (Pfizer, Astrazeneca, Moderna) reduce asymptomatic infections & does reduced symptomatic infection imply reduced infections?
Thread
Background
Developing a vaccine for COVID-19 has been a goal since the virus was 1st identified in Jan 2020.
But what is the purpose of vaccines? Many, it turns out!
They can reduce disease, reduce infection, or reduce infectiousness, or some combination.
nymag.com/intelligencer/…
Why does it matter whether vaccine reduces disease, infection or infectiousness?
Because it changes who we vaccinate first & whether vaccination protects friends & family of vaccinated person (herd immunity!).
Read 27 tweets
14 Dec 20
Why do we exclude groups from vaccine trials (pregnant, lactating women, people w/ anaphylactic reactions) & then allow vaccination of them based on trials? Isn't this recipe for possibly very bad outcomes? Urgent remedy needed.
Thread
nytimes.com/2020/12/11/hea…
Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine was just granted EUA from FDA. EUA does not exclude any groups, except children under 16.
fda.gov/media/144412/d…
CDC met today & also recommended vaccination w/out clear exclusions for groups excluded (e.g. pregnant women).
cnbc.com/2020/12/12/cdc…
But who was excluded from phase 3 trial? Many groups!
Pregnant/breastfeeding women
History of anaphylaxis
Immunocompromised
Those being treated w/ corticosteriods
etc.
Read 8 tweets
14 Dec 20
What wildlife could be reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2?
New paper suggests North American big brown bats are not. Here's why this is important & why we need more studies like this.
Thread
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tb…
We still don't know the natural reservoir for SARS-CoV-2. Some similar viruses were found in horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus spp.), but the difference between those viruses & SARS-CoV-2 is large enough that SARS-CoV-2 may have different reservoir.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Regardless of where SARS-CoV-2 originally came from, many have worried that SARS-CoV-2 might be transmitted from humans into other animals that might be able to sustain the virus & transmit it back to humans.
Read 25 tweets
13 Dec 20
Who should be vaccinated next?
1st batch Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine is shipping & will go to HCW + nursing homes as it should. But next tier is debated (essential workers? elderly? pre-existing morbidities?).
Model suggests elderly for decreasing deaths but more info needed
Thread
FDA & CDC have given green light for Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. Supplies are very limited initially & transmission is raging so it's important to choose carefully in who to vaccinate first. How can we determine what is best? Mathematical models!
A very nice paper by @bubar_kate @DanLarremore @StephenKissler @sarahcobey @yhgrad @mlipsitch tries to determine which age group should be prioritized to minimize deaths, years of life lost, and total incidence.
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Read 15 tweets
8 Dec 20
Vaccine distribution w/ fragile vaccine is hard.

Pfizer's vaccine needing a -80C freezer is making it hard to get it to the most needy people. And shipping containers of 975 doses are making it harder still.
Short thread
Everyone is understandably excited about Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, w/ 95% efficacy against symptomatic cases (but data not so clear for severe infections: ). Now, we need to get it to the people most in need & fast.
Why fast? B/c there are 200K new cases/day in US (maybe 800K infections/day () & ~600K globally? About 0.5-1% of these infections will lead to death (
) a month from now. So time is critical & every day matters.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!