Most of the time I only see people whom I've repeatedly encountered in real life in dreams. Then there is the rare dream where one sees a several (10-15) people whose faces are visible with great clarity, from close quarters & display of emotions. But they are people you have
apparently never seen in real life. You are in conversation of a very familiar form with them. I've always been puzzled by where they come from: 1. Are they people who you might have after seen but forgotten. Even if that were so you have not ever had any deep real life
interaction to keep them in the conscious memory. 2. They are people generated by a certain face-generating algorithm that lies hidden in the brain -- one could see an adaptive value for such. The agency independent of yours that they display is also notable. The algorithm then
not just generates the faces but also a whole differentiated agency distinct from your own for these dream people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Few comments since this topic is as perennial as the AIT issue among internet H -- of course you may not like it, so don't @ me. The domesticated Bos was a central animal for the subsistence of the Indo-European pastoralists on the steppe. It was also a major domesticate for the
the pre-IE Indian peoples like the Harappans and the neolithic Ash Mound culture of southern India (i.e. the bUti-palli/halli-s; early Dravidians?). What is clear is that these pre-IE & circum-IE entry peoples of India consumed the flesh of cattle. However, it is like the female
animal (henceforth cow) was also valued for milk->curds/cheese(?) among both the Harappan and Ash Mound peoples. The former probably also used them as draught animals. The situation was similar with the IEans on the steppe with their version of Bos cattle playing a major role in
bAlabodhana: a version of this molecule (more precisely with an additional -OH bonded to the C2' atom has been a key technological advance in the mRNA vaccines being rolled out. The relevant part is that hexagonal ring (the base) called 1N-methylpseudouracil
The mRNA vaccines are the triumph a still hazy principle in biology termed "social RNA". The reason for is that many organisms have an inbuilt immune action directed against social RNA for it could be a pathogenic RNA. The key idea in these vaccines is the use of the above base
systematically instead of its usual base uracil. This N-methyl pseudouridine does 2 things: makes the vaccine RNA less capable of triggering the body's anti-RNA immunity &inflammatory response & simultaneous makes it a better mRNA i.e. better for protein production. If as
1 observes that in India or many nations of the occident there is a fear of certain facts, i.e. quite reliable inferences based on reproducible observations, being "weaponized". The general reaction is to deny those facts by claiming them to be false or the exact opposite. This
At the same time people are quite comfortable believing relatively complex facts that they cannot easily verify like the earth going around the sun rather than the other way. However, they will put on airs deep understanding to attempt denial of the facts they deem weaponized
The Soviet Union did the same by force and several occidental nations are doing the same now: such denial can only be maintained by such. In contrast while the late Singaporean leader was called many names he decided to play along with with uncomfortable facts. The H really need
There is a certain mental tendency that exists across groups to accept a patently contra-factual framework as reality. Once that is accepted the individuals who have done so work within that framework & to them the factual reality or pratyakSha appears delusional. To such people
trying show the facts doesn't work because they are already inside their new pseudo-reality. One may say what is the problem? Could their reality not be equally valid even as Euclidean, hyperbolic and elliptical geometry? No, we are not talking about axiomatic systems here but
the process of deductions from logic. The old H had presented two important principles: 1) tR^itIyaprakArAbhAvaM cha sUchayati | ity eka-pramANa-vyApAraH : in the west it is called the law of the excluded middle and lAghava-nyAya, i.e. the principle of parsimony. When you reject
I wonder if the best way to get people learn programming (and mathematics) is by showing people how it can help in something they are really interested in. Of course I'm from an older generation & in my youth few people had access to computers. There were a subset of guys who
wanted to become engineers as it paid well. They used to learn programming in some local sheds where it used to be taught mostly without computers. They would write out code on paper with pencil and on the last day of their course get once chance to enter into real computers
to see if it ran. I found that utter bizarre & unappealing. Hence, rather than following their course I bided my time carrying out biological/astronomical/mathematical/chemical experiments with a hand calculator.But once I got access to a computer I knew exactly what I wanted so
I have been wanting to do an ongoing thread. To an Arya the entire shruti is inspiring but there are particular sUkta-s and mantra-s that especially so (other students of the shruti might create their own parallel thread of this kind if interested). It is hard to say this is the
most inspiring sUkta. However, to me there is some set which might be called "among the most inspiring" or "the essence of religion". From that set I'll place as first sUkta: RV 2.12: yo jAta eva prathamo manasvAn... of gR^itsamada shaunahotra: It is replete with sublime mantras
It is also found as AV vulgate 20.34. Within it one of the most inspiring R^ik-s are:
dyAvA chid asmai pR^ithivI namete
shuShmAch chid asya parvatA bhayante |
yaH somapA nichito vajrabAhur
yo vajrahastaH sa janAsa indraH ||