I’m naturally a unionist.
But the problem UK now has is its govt has “othered” Scots (remember Miliband in Salmond’s top pocket? The Scots do) for a decade now...
....but if you “other” a nation but don’t offer them a way to leave this is an inherently destructive situation.
2nd problem for the Union is while there is a lot of truth in the argument that breaking with a 60million neighbor will be economically costly for Scotland - there is a 450m Union + N Ireland waiting as ready made alternative.
This is a rare situation for independence movements.
3/
Independence referendums tend to fail due to 3 issues
1. Status quo bias 2. Emotional bond 3. Economic cost
Othering & Brexit have torpedoed the 1st two.
Suspect any future referendum will be fought almost exclusively on the 3rd point.
Will it be enough?
I don’t think so.
4/
Scotland is oft compared to Quebec in that Canada needed to simply see out the Quebec Indy excitement & then it’d drift away.
Problem is Canada is seen as both federally & as country a success.
The lesson for Unionists is they need to show success both in AND of the Union.
5/
But the question is how?
Will Brexit UK really generate such a success that Scots actively turn their back not just on an independent Scotland but on the idea of anti-brexitism itself - which is fast becoming an intrinsic part of Scottish identity?
6/
Given above if I were advising govt I would risk a “smart loose federal unionism” that built in many advantages for Scots. Enough to deter swing voters.
Problem now is I suspect unionism depends solely on refusing a 2nd referendum - something that didn’t stop eurosceptics...
7/
So this is the problem
Yes Westminster could continue the hardline & refuse Scots a way out but they have to continue that forever this seems unlikely - sooner or later they’ll be a hung parliament- so again if I were advising this is what I would offer the Scots...
8/
A referendum but with an ALREADY EXISTING option of irrevocable full federalism versus independence.
It might not win but it would be worth a shot compared to current situation which resembles a horrifically dysfunctional family.
The current state cannot hold.
/ends
ADD+1
A couple of people have suggested this is all quite patronizing to Scots.
Not at all, if I were a Scot its probable I’d vote for independence if referendum was tomorrow.
The thread was an attempt to cooly analyse the situation from a British/English unionist perspective.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will try to do this thread without swearing but it will be hard…
…and I’m afraid im really going to have to spell it out to some of you.
This EU has set out a way back to Rejoin…but many of you remainers still don’t get it....
- A thread -
2/
How many of you wanging on about Starmer actually read the treaty or commentary on it?
Of course it’s lousy. But in 1 way it’s good:
If you’d read it, you'd know EU have cleverly & quite deliberately set out a way back to rejoin..
...with big bl**dy lanterns to mark the way
3/ The treaty sets up not just a framework for constant negotiations but 5 year reviews for “adjustment”. Anything is possible 2026:
Single Market, alignment up to 90% of EU membership – but one thing won’t be – Rejoin.
& that’s as 2024 election won’t be fought on 2nd referendum.
I see alot of friends here are getting angry at various Starmer comments on Brexit.
I get its an emotional time, but with respect, alot of people arent thinking rationally right now.
No Starmer hasn't gone full Brexit - we need to look a bit more soberly at things.
A thread.
2/
The anger at whether Labour votes for the deal is one of the biggest, dullest non-issues of the day.
Its Johnson's deal - as he insists on telling us at every moment.
The ERG back it.
Labour's vote makes no difference either way.
I'd prefer Abstain - but I dont really care.
3/
Agonising over this is pointless.
A case can be made for all 3 options.
But ultimately its Johnson deal, the Conservatives deal and Labour MPs voting for it won't change that.
Nobody is going to come back & say it was Labour that brought this deal in 2 years time.
Let it go.
Complains: 1. Northern Ireland "cut off from the rest of UK" 2. European Human Rights regime "remains in UK" 3. UK "saddled with a rotten fishing deal" 4. EU firms will "still be allowed to tender for UK govt contracts"
2/3
Nigel Farage further on "Boris Johnson's rotten deal"
"In regulatory terms, the EU will hold a Sword of Damocles over Britain with the threat of immediate tariffs if they judge that Britain is being too competitive".
"This is not what I campaigned for".
3/3
Nigel Farage today:
"This is most certainly not what Boris Johnson's supporters voted for in the 2019 General Election".
"These handicaps will not allow Britain to transform itself into the Singapore-style entity in a European time zone that it could become."
2. Immigration will surely be trickier. But is UK govt really going to sabotage this? Will they also make reciprocal EU students going to N Ire unbearably difficult?
No.
As for numbers - English is the most demanded language - so Scotland will have no problem attracting students.
3. Costs - a problem. But not insurmountable it’s a matter of will & priority.
EU as @guyverhofstadt has shown has many interested in supporting UK students in ERASMUS.
In any case ERASMUS is not significantly expensive due to principle of reciprocity & low transport costs.