This follow up thread explores one aspect more deeply: the interplay between candidates and polls
1/13
So what's the starting position?
CDU is 3% ⬆️ in the opinion polls now, compared to their result in 2017. But that 36% is a good bit below the 41.5% they secured in 2013.
In other words: 36% is good, but not stellar.
2/13
Recall that the 33% from 2017 caused Merkel to be replaced by AKK as CDU party leader, so disappointed was the party with that result.
30% would result in some very serious questions being asked about the party's strategy.
3/13
So then, the 🔑 question: what would the appointment of Laschet, Merz or Röttgen do for the CDU's polling position?
And were it to go badly, what then?
4/13
Laschet is seen as the continuity Merkel candidate, but is neither as trusted nor as respected as she is. But his voter coalition would largely be the same as Merkel's.
5/13
Merz by contrast would likely take the CDU more to the right, and emphasise topics traditionally that were the strength of the FDP. His more conservative and populist stances could also appeal to AfD voters.
6/13
So a Merz victory would likely eat into the FDP and partially AfD support (possibly pushing the FDP below the 5% hurdle).
But any gains here would be likely balanced by a loss of supporters to the Grüne and the SPD.
The big question: how do these balance out?
7/13
Were the outsider Röttgen to win, the impact would be more similar to that of Laschet than of Merz. Greens and the SPD might fear Röttgen's professional pragmatism more than Laschet's ill defined folksy style.
8/13
But then the massive question: how much will the polls change in each case? And how quickly?
9/13
If we reach late spring and the CDU is still on 36% in the polls, whoever the CDU chose as party leader is going to be a pretty safe bet to be candidate to be Chancellor.
10/13
If it's 33% - Merkel's score from 2017 - then perhaps the CDU will stick with their man.
If it's 30%... then 📞 Munich and ask for Söder (CSU) to step in and save the Union from defeat.
11/13
The characters of Laschet, Merz and Röttgen will likely play a role here. Of the three I can least likely see Merz step aside, although the pressure on him to do so from CDU members of the Bundestag (who like him less than members do) could become immense.
12/13
But more than the individuals' reactions, it strikes me what happens to the polling numbers in spring is going to be the decisive factor as to whether Söder, or Laschet/Merz/Röttgen, becomes the candidate to be Chancellor.
Does the CDU panic? Or back their guy?
13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To those saying that those who have got their public health advice wrong earlier in the pandemic should put up their hands and apologise... a little cautionary lesson from another sector
A short 🧵
1/
Public health is not my thing
But Brexit is
And throughout 2019 and 2020 I have been trying to make predictions as to what will happen in that story. Lives do not depend on this, only my professional reputation (marginally) does
2/12
The three series of #BrexitDiagram I made in 2019 were extraordinarily accurate
OK, so it's a fortnight away - the "Digital Party Conference" of the CDU to decide who the next party leader will be
And whoever wins this is going to have a good chance of being Chancellor, succeeding Merkel after the election in September this year
There are three main candidates in the running - all middle aged men from Nordrhein Westfalen
- Friedrich Merz
- Armin Laschet
- Norbert Röttgen
So who's going to win?
For ages it looked like Laschet was the clear front runner. Prime Minister of Nordrhein Westfalen (NRW), and with a kind of folksy-beergarten manner, it looked good for him.
Or - putting it another way - how dare those of us who’ve (thank goodness) never had parts of our family slaughtered by a dictatorial regime ever presume to judge how future generations of those families react at the personal level?
Also the piece says this: “Xenophobia and racism, presumed to be banished to the margins of public life, made an ugly return to the mainstream”
UK academic takes the absolutist position of a provocative French journalist, and uses this as a mirror for his own absolutist position that the EU has not reflected about the impact of Brexit
The same academic is then criticised for this position - because that there has been *no* reflection in the EU is not the case - but then twists the words of those responses
In my politically formative years - in my teens - I always struggled with references to politicians of previous generations.
“Edward Heath would have done that!” or “Harold Wilson would have done that better!” people might have said, but it didn’t resonate
Now of course I’ve subsequently read about Wilson and Heath and plenty of others besides. I have an impression of how those political times must have been
But then this week my immediate reaction - when hearing the Commons would have a matter of just a few hours to scrutinise the trade deal - was to wonder how Robin Cook would have behaved
I saw these Johnson pics circulating on Twitter, and assumed this must be a kind of hatchet job against the PM somehow... but no, they're ALL on the official Flickr channel - Creative Commons Licensed no less!