This is not a fair comment. Myself, @NeilShenvi@HPluckrose and @ConceptualJames have all explained how CRT is related to both Marxism and postnodernism, and we have quoted the theorists and academic literature in explaing this...
Critical Race Theory (CRT) is related to marxism because CRT uses a neo-marxist approach called "Critical Theory" when it analyzes the relationship between race and the law.
Here is an excerpt from the book "Words That Wound" which was co-written by three of the founders of CRT: Mari Matsuda, Richard Delgado, and Kimberlee Crenshaw. That book explicitly states that CRT uses marxism, Critical Theory, and Postmodernism.
Here is a link to the thread I did where I explain the relationship between CRT and Postmodernism amd where I quote that book and a host of other literature:
Here is a link to "A Pincipled Opposition to Critical Race Theory" which is an excerpt from Cynical Theories which @HPluckrose wrote with @ConceptualJames
It's wrong to say that those opposed to CRT cannot show the connection between CRT and Marxism. As you can see, several of us have brought receipts amd shown how the relstionship works by quoting many of the CRT founders.
Of what the disagreement is. I think @ConceptualJames@HPluckrose@NeilShenvi and myself have done a fair job of being honest and clear about where we disagree with CRT.
I'm not convinced our opponents have shown the same concern for accuracy with respect to our arguments
/fin
/PS
How did I forget this???
@ConceptualJames did a VERY thorough and clear explanation of the relationship between Marxism and Wokeness for New Discourses. It's the best article I've read which focuses on exactly that point. That piece is here:
1/ One of the most common tricks used by woke Social Justice activists to defend their view is to de-legitimize criticism by attacking the motives of the person who is opposing them. The goal is to undercut the moral authority and social standing of anyone who disagrees with them
2/ If you criticize the views of woke Social justice Activists they'll attack your motivations and imply that you're not being honest about your true motives. The goal is to make the audience suspicious of your intentions so they won't trust you or believe anything you say.
3/ By attacking your motives the woke activists can both discredit you while getting the audience to raise their level of skepticism toward you. This tactic is sometime referred to as "poisoning the well."
@MeditarMestizo@NeilShenvi 1/
Delgado and Stefancic explicitly state "recently, critical Race Theory has expanded into other fields" and then give a list.
This is in "the Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education." Published by Routledge.
@MeditarMestizo@NeilShenvi 2/
There is an entire history of CRT in education amd many books on the topic. Routledge, one of the leading academic publishers has no less than 5 large anthologies on this with material going back 20 years.
To imply CRT is primarily about race and the law is simply not true
@MeditarMestizo@NeilShenvi 3/
Your bio says you're writing a book o CRT for IVP academic. I expect you to be clear about what CRT is and does.
1/ There is an entire industry of guys like this whose only goal is to front as "speaking truth to power" while they build a brand. "Social Justice"
*IS* the cool thing.
2/ I did an entire thread on how these sort of people monetize Social Justice on the one hand, and the turn around and accuse anyone who disagree with their ideas and methods of being in it for power and money.
3/ Books like "White Fragility" and "how to be antiracist" sell millions of copies...because that's where the money is and this guy thinks anyone who would say "this recent cultural view that progressive Christians are adopting is bad theology" is in it for money and power...
The New York Times helped destroy the life of a college freshman over a 3 second video while it's staff repeatedly tweet abhorent racial insults at white people.
For those asking, the latest jnfo I have is that Jeong still works for the NYT.
Again: THE POINT IS NOT TO CANCEL SARAH JEONG. DO NOT CANCEL HER.
The point is the NYT should not be pouring gas on the fire of cancel culture by giving it the oxygen of credibility...
Destroying a girls life with a snapchat video should not be national news. This is glorified Gossip. A story like that might be the subject of an editorial about how having a digital foot print reaching back into your teens carries consequences we don't know how to handle yet
1/ Jimmy Galligan got a 3 second video of a White 15 year old girl saying the N-word while singing along to a rap song. He posted the clip publicly 4 years later when the girl started university to maximize impact and ruin her life.
Guess what, he left his social media public...
2/ it turns out Jimmy Galligan, who ruined a girls life over a 4 year old snapchat video, made a video where he complains about being depressed in his freshman year of highschool because things he did in 6-8th grade followed him into highschool and he got judged for them.
3/ THE POINT HERE IS NOT TO CANCEL HIM. DO NOT CANCEL HIM
Jimmy Galligan knew how it felt to have things from his past follow him into his next stage of life and be to judged for them. Then he went and did that exact thing to someone else. However...