Two months after Joe Biden carried the state, Democrats have pulled it off and appear to have won a trifecta by sweeping the double-barrel runoffs in Georgia. #GASen
Every single organizer, volunteer, campaign worker, and Democrat should be proud of what Georgia has just achieved. It's a roadmap for the rest of the South, and it's exactly how you capitalize on shifting political trends.
Jon Ossoff is 33.
Given his age and the shifting landscape of Georgia's politics, he could keep that seat blue for a long, long time.
From political punchline to savior. What a journey.
Ossoff's victory looks likely to end outside the recount threshold, which should mean he gets seated faster.
He will be the senior senator from Georgia, as with all other tiebreakers failing, his name (O) comes before Warnock's in alphabetical order.
The way Perdue wins right now is to pray for an absolute miracle and hope that all outstanding ballots just stop counting. That, or pray that batches which were D+40 in November take a 35 point swing to the right.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This does *not* diminish the incredible organizing work Abrams did one bit.
It does say, though, that if we want to win as a party, we need to understand the underlying reason behind the GA win: huge suburban swing and Black turnout
Abrams had a lot to do with increased Black turnout and should be applauded for it, and this infrastructure should be built on.
She had little to do with swings in places like Henry.
Seen a lot of impeachment speculation around the TL.
My thoughts here are that there's a lot of anger floating around, and I really wouldn't be surprised one bit if "moderate" members like Kinzinger vote yes.
But now the more I think, the more I doubt it. *This* is their line?
Thought exercise: What's in it, politically, for some random House GOP member like Mike Simpson to vote yes on impeachment?
You just get a primary and another lunatic replaces you. They'll justify it by saying "if I don't stay, someone worse comes in".
"It's the right thing to do to remove!" Sure, but aside from some notable cases (Kinzinger, Fitzpatrick, and Mace are notable ones that jump to mind), why do we think any of them have a thread of integrity to stand on principle?
I want to acknowledge a lot of the others on this #GASen modeling ride:
@ADincgor -- the model's co-creator @joe__gantt, who also models it and has given us the precinct adjustment for our model @thunderousprof and @dooraven, who track early voting reporting with us
[1/]
@EconWanabe, @Eggymceggerson3 and @umichvoter99, who track the backlogs and outstanding ballots and follow the data just as closely. @krazgreinetz, who's done a great job writing on/tracking this. @EScrimshaw, who was the first to yell at me about why our initial model was wrong
@OpenModelProj, who have really done a standout job in improving model transparency @DFMresearch, who's been modeling this on the side as well @nolesfan2011 and @elium2, who have walked me through several key GA metrics and voting procedures @JDubwub for his great graphics
Given that Democrats still have most of their election day voters from November who haven't voted yet, the GOP probably needs 1.1M voters tomorrow, IMO, to have a fighting shot, and even then they need to drive up the margins.
Where does that come from?
The GOP has had a serious turnout problem during all of early voting. If your argument is that many have switched their vote to election day, fine -- I agree to some extent! But that ignores the fact that many just won't vote. And not everyone who plans to vote will.
So who does that help?
My gut feeling is that people here overestimate the red skew on election day in margin. There's an argument to be made that Democrats shouldn't expect their election day vote to crater as much. And white rural voters are awful with turnout in general.