Hawaii Rep. Kai Kahele is also on board with impeachment. Notably, he just replaced Tulsi Gabbard, who voted "present" on Trump's first impeachment
Things are moving very fast. We're now up to at least 13 House Democrats who have called for Trump's impeachment. Publicly viewable whip list here: dkel.ec/3nmCJHl
This is a very big one: Carolyn Bourdeaux, who was just elected to a historically red district in the Atlanta suburbs and was the only Dem to flip a GOP House seat w/o a boost from court-ordered redistricting, just came out for impeachment
MA Rep. Katherine Clark, who is now the #4-ranking Dem in the House, has called for Trump's "removal" but hasn't yet used the word "impeachment." Out of an abundance of caution, we're not adding her to the whip list just yet, but this is still big
Note that we're not tracking calls to invoke the 25th Amendment in our whip list, just calls for impeachment, because Democrats have control only over the latter
We're also not tracking supporters of Cori Bush's expulsion resolution. Cosponsors of that measure will appear on congress.gov
We're now up to 20 House Democrats who are calling for Trump to be impeached. As several people have pointed out, that's more the the number of terrorists arrested so far as a result of today's attempted coup dkel.ec/3nmCJHl
WHOA. Conservative Blue Dog Rep. Jim Cooper just came out for impeachment
So far, we have 35 House Democrats—and zero Republicans—on our Trump impeachment whip list. Find the complete version here: dkel.ec/3nmCJHl
Now up to 42 House Dems calling for Trump's impeachment, just 7 hours after the first (David Cicilline) did so. I'd stress that these calls are coming from every corner of the party: moderates, progressives, freshmen, veterans, every region.
I started today triumphantly updating my long-dormant filibuster reform whip list. I ended it updating an impeachment whip list instead. My heart is heavy.
It's truly snowballing. In the 20 mins since my last tweet, we're now up to 48 House Dems for impeachment *that we're aware of*. Keep in mind that we have to research these all one by one. Thanks to the MANY folks who have been helping out!
50 Democrats are now on record supporting impeachment of Donald Trump. Note that this all began just 8 hours ago, when Rep. @davidcicilline said, "This is outrageous, and the president caused it. We should impeach and convict him tomorrow."
I'm signing off for the night w/52 names on the impeachment whip list. Let me know if you see any new names—and please include links. (Also, I'm not cataloging people calling for the 25th amendment to be invoked) Thanks again to everyone who helped today
Good morning. We're now up to 58 House Democrats calling for Trump's impeachment. That's up from 52 when I signed off just after midnight last night. However, it's not the flood we'd need to see this happen. Please call your representatives dkel.ec/3nmCJHl
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just before the House votes on Ds' coronavirus aid package, the HEROES Act, later today, Republicans will try to add a poison pill using a mechanism called the "motion to recommit." A better term for it is a troll amendment
*ALL DEMOCRATS MUST VOTE AGAINST THIS TROLL AMENDMENT*
Summary: GOPers offer a bad-faith amendment that vulnerable Dems are afraid to vote against. Worst-case scenario: the amendment passes, making the full bill unpalatable to most Dems—and Republicans will still vote against the bill anyway
It looks like some folks are hearing about the IDC for the first time tonight. Gather round, because if you don't already know about this gang of scumbag turncoat "Democrats" who enabled Republican rule in New York for years, you'll want learn 1/
"IDC" stood for "Independent Democratic Conference." Four members of the New York state Senate who'd been elected as Democrats, led by Jeff Klein, broke away from the party in 2011 and sided with the GOP majority in the chamber (Republicans had won back control in 2010) 2/
In exchange for turning traitor, these Benedicts Arnold were given plum committee chairs by Republicans, which came with major perks, particularly big extra pay bumps 3/ nytimes.com/2017/05/09/nyr…
And let's also talk about "true progressive" Tulsi Gabbard when it comes to other issues. Her record is *awful*. I laid much of it out here, but now it's time for a thread: dailykos.com/stories/2019/1…
Gabbard has for years cultivated ties to violent Hindu nationalists in India, including now-PM Narendra Modi, who oversaw the Gujarat pogrom of 2002 that left over 1,000 Muslims dead when he was the state's chief minister theintercept.com/2019/01/05/tul…
Gabbard came up as a virulent anti-gay activist. As a member of the Hawaii legislature in 2004, she said, "As Democrats we should be representing the views of the people, not a small number of homosexual extremists" archives.starbulletin.com/2004/02/20/new…
This is such a colossal “fuck you” by North Carolina Senate Democrats to all the people who have fought—and donated to—the legal battle to end gerrymandering
NC Republicans are gleeful right now. Democrats just gave them a huge gift. The GOP can now say to the court, "Your honors, this map passed with bipartisan support!" even though it's STILL a pro-Republican gerrymander
On top of that, the NC GOP can also point to comments like those from *DEM* Senate leader Dan Blue, who idiotically declared, "This is the most transparent redistricting process in history."
B.S. This process was completely tainted, as people like @EveryVoiceNC have documented
I think part of this feigned hysteria on the right about Castro’s (totally legitimate) use of public donor info is also part of a ploy to attack campaign finance disclosure laws. They’d like nothing more than for all money to be dark money
Really good point. The constant GOP smearing of Soros with antisemitic tropes actually led to someone trying to murder him with a bomb
A lot of folks have rightly asked why reporters are playing along. I think it’s because they have an inability to draw distinctions between Trump’s incitement and what Castro has done here. Also a DEEP desire to #bothsides everything and to scold Democrats
My colleague Mark Sumner (@Devilstower) has written this up: If Trump declares a national emergency, Pelosi can immediately pass a resolution to end the emergency—and then the Senate would *have* to take it up dailykos.com/stories/2019/1…
Sure, the Senate might vote down such a resolution, but at the very least, it would put Mitch McConnell and every single Republican senator in the deeply awkward position of having to openly defend—in an on-the-record roll call vote—Trump's declaration of emergency
Let me be clear about something here: The National Emergency Act *requires* the other chamber to take action when one chamber passes a resolution to end an emergency. McConnell cannot kill it. The Senate would literally HAVE to vote.