Like @BenMazer, I was bummed to have a op-ed during the riot

In it, I describe the reality that most medical treatments have very marginal effects.

A reality with big implications

d/w @VPrasadMDMPH @lowninstitute @AndrewFoy82 @drjohnm

washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/0…
1/
2/ If clinicians understood small chance of benefit with most Rx, I feel we would make very different decisions for most patients

Thanks @MikeMadden editor

By taking a medication daily we buy a lottery ticket with a payout often as low as 1% or 2%.
3/ And we can’t know if we won or not…as winning usually means "nothing" happens.

Of course, we assume no bad outcome = benefits,

so 95% or more appear to benefit, not the 1-2% who truly benefit from RCTs
4/ I'm not a medical nihilist like Jacob Stetenga, I believe medicine has good things... Image
5/ But....
“This phenomenon, in which the perceived benefits of a treatment far outstrip the reality, is surprisingly common. …The benefits are real, but they tend to be very small”
6/ Research often still reports misleading RRR for marginally effective studies— ja.ma/2JpRkUr @jsross119
Drug companies and device manufacturers do the same thing pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10349065/ @DeeMangin
7/ It’s not surprising then that “many clinicians have undue faith in medicines and treatments they prescribe and recommend.”
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamai…
8/ We need to balance harms vs. benefits
lowninstitute.org/wp-content/upl… Image
9/ “It’s not surprising that many doctors have trouble discussing chance of benefit and harm from treatment. Over their careers, they receive little help in grasping the topic”
There is a better approach jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/… Image
10/ The task of the doctor is broader than simply making patients physically better, because often enough, we can’t actually do that. We need to realize, or perhaps remember, that our job isn’t only to cure people; it’s also to help them make it through when there is no easy cure

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Morgan

Dan Morgan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dr_dmorgan

12 Apr
How good are doctors at diagnosis?

This is the most relevant paper I have written. Not perfect but addresses a huge issue I think could change medicine if acknowledged
…it has changed how I think about diagnosis

ja.ma/3rQNtjv
@JAMAInternalMed
@drjohnm
1/n
summary:
Clinicians widely overestimated chance of disease especially after testing

Cardiac ischemia after + ECG—EBM 2-11%, median answer 70%
UTI after + urine cx—EBM 0-8.3%, answer 80%
Breast CA after + mammo—EBM 3-9%, answer 50%
Pneumonia after + CXR EBM 46-65%, answer 95%
Gerd Gigerenzer, David Eddy, @StevenWoloshin @arjunmanrai & others asked how well doctors do at the math of understanding diagnosis, and found they aren’t great.

Many of issues w/ real life tests covered by @deeksj @d_spiegel @dan_diekema
Read 20 tweets
21 Dec 20
We set out to identify the sensitivity & specificity of common tests for #COVID19 along w/ @dan_diekema , @Anthony98947615 w/ @CDCgov support

A simple enough task, right?

I’ve seen tweets by @DrSidMukherjee @drjohnm @BenMazer @PaulSaxMD @BradSpellberg and others interested
1/n
Looking for comments/criticism

What are we missing? No industry adverts please!

Important papers?
2/n
The @US_FDA has a test comparison site that is incomprehensible to me… but @ASMicrobiology types tell me it reports on analytical sensitivity and LoD for tests
3/n
Read 20 tweets
15 Sep 20
Catch yourself when you say “risks vs. benefits” because you aren’t making a fair comparison.

In @JAMA_current ja.ma/336Lj4Y
& podcast ja.ma/2FAGKI2

@eliowa @drjohnm @d_spiegel @zeynep @VPrasadMDMPH

Why we say it and what we think is better below...
This building block of clinical decisions biases by framing uncertain harm vs. certain benefits and nudges towards treatment

Written with
@DKorenstein @ldscherer
(Over 2 years, i'm embarrassed to admit)
Clearly, the words physicians use have
a critical function in this communication

Referring to harms as “risks” emphasizes that
the unfavorable outcome may or may not happen,
whereas there is no parallel language that highlights
the equally probabilistic nature of “benefits.”
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(