1/9 It's tempting to turn to the war on terror model to fight far right violence. But we need to: 1) consider whether it's the right model for the situation; and 2) find ways to ensure that we don't cross constitutional lines. Here's how we do that:
2/9 RESOLVE. After 9/11 we swore never again & mobilized as a country. We were able to do that bc we saw the enemy as "other" -- foreign, Muslim, dark.
3/9 We have to find resolve to fight far right violence w/o otherizing all Trump supporters. Why? There are too many of them. Collective responsibility is wrong. It will lead to abuses. There will be a backlash. See breakdown of relations bw Muslims & law enforcement 4 an e.g.
4/9 LEADERSHIP. Since 9/11, Muslim leaders have been called on denounce any & all terrorist attacks. They're constantly being told they didn't denounce loud enough or soon enough or they didn't mean it.
5/9 Far right violence shouldn't get oxygen from political leaders. The end of the Trump presidency will help. But lots of R leaders have fueled their grievances. Time for them to step up. And if they don't the so-called "establishment Rs" have to find ways to make them.
6/9 DATA. We need to better understand the extent of the threat. Don't @ me, I saw the videos too. The FY2020 NDAA required the FBI to produce a report & intel assessment on domestic terrorism by 3/2020. Haven't seen it yet. Must be a top priority for @JoeBiden
7/9 STRATEGY. We need the DOJ to articulate a strategy for how they plan to address far-right violence. Here is what civil society groups think is needed.
8/9 There's also bad stuff from the war on terror that we don't need, including a new, broad domestic terrorism statute (already have many laws, see how easily the 1/6 attackers r being indicted) or greater intel authorities (everyone knew what was planned, except the cops).
When the dust clears, folks will inevitably start talking about "countering violent extremism" #CVE aimed at the types of folks who stormed the capitol today. Here are a few things to think about.
What is CVE? Well, its a lot of diff things, lets go through them:
➡️ trying to ID potentially violent folks, very hard to do, where do you even start when you can't focus your resources on an identifiable minority as #CVE has done so far. No evidence it works at all.
➡️ community outreach to build relations with "affected communities" in the hope they will tell you what's going on. Generally cops/DHS/FBI have mtgs with ppl they identify as community leaders. Not clear how this translates when you can't really identify a "community."
So, at Trump's direction, DHS is treating protecting statutes & identifying demonstrators as a homeland security priority. A few additional thoughts on the intel programs described here. lawfareblog.com/dhs-authorizes…
First, they're supposed to use the "least intrusive collection techniques feasible and sufficient" - publicly available info is listed as not intrusive, so expect a lot of social media monitoring, which DHS is heavily into. See here for details: brennancenter.org/sites/default/…
They're allowed to use physical surveillance, mail covers, and monitoring devices "to the extent permitted by rules." The rules only permit use of devices for counter-intelligence. IDK how these are enforced.
Trump administration just announced new immigration restrictions, just about 3 years after the #MuslimBan. It applies to: Myanmar, Nigeria, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan, Eritrea, Sudan. Lots to unpack here, so keep reading.
4 out of 6 of these countries are in Africa. Trump has never wanted immigration from Africa, remember this remark about "shithole countries"? 4 of them are also majority Muslim, so there's def a pattern here.
The bulk of the restrictions apply to immigrant visas -- ppl from Nigeria, Myanmar, Kyrgyzstan & Eritrea who would mostly be coming to unite w family in the U.S. can't do that anymore. As we've said before, these bans operate as #familyseparation policies. thehill.com/opinion/immigr…
It focuses on white nationalist VIOLENCE, rather than speech or ideology thus avoiding slippage between speech and action that we have seen in other contexts (e.g., targeting Muslims for terrorism based on their religious beliefs rather than their actions).
It correctly notes that the problem is that FBI hasn't traditionally given priority to white nationalist violence & this has to change.
Turns out FBI agents visiting universities asking them to keep tabs on students, especially from China, as reported by @NPRnpr.org/2019/06/28/728…. But that is not all the administration is doing to keep tabs on what students are studying.
As we pointed out in a recent @BrennanCenter report, ICE is already monitoring students via social media.