THREAD: I've said it before & I'll say it again:
We do a massive disservice to the unique historical experiences of both black South Africans & Palestinians to make this solipsistic comparison and use "apartheid" as a blanket term -
Words matter. (1)…
I've spent some time in South Africa - the origins of the colony are different, the rule of only 10% of population (white) over the rest totalitarian, the terrible history of black South Africans in the 20th century well-known. But...(2)
I don't think any serious scholar of the South African experience would see complete parallels to the Palestinian case (which I will get to in a minute) and the end-goal was vastly different: Rainbow Nation was about a 'one state solution' of equality, not a two state solution...
The Palestinian case shares some common features with South Africa - population transfer/ethnic cleansing, restriction of movement, lack of citzenship rights (beyond the Green Line (more on that in a moment), continued second class citizenship and ethnocracy (3)
But B'Tselem, for it's own political reasons, fails to distinguish between Israel within the Green Line and beyond the Green Line. It is absolutely false to draw equivalency across the board here (4)
Within the Green Line: It's not an ideal picture-ethnocracy, 2nd class citizenship, & of late, the horrific Nation-State law. But Arab-Israelis hold passports, serve in the Knesset, in all parts of workforce/civil society. That's not 'apartheid'-it's a VERY imperfect democracy.
Is the arc of the moral universe bending toward justice within the Green Line? Unclear. But Arab-Israelis currently have the 3rd largest party in Knesset, are participating in politics, and (some) desire further integration. Change is inevitable, whether Israel like it or not.
Now let's get to the heart of the matter: Palestinians under Israeli occupation. We need new terminology to describe the unique system of dual rights for Israeli citizens and Palestinians in the West Bank, alongside the completely different situation for Palestinians in Gaza.
This language must take into account the daily violations of human rights, denial of Palestinian sovereignty, restrictions on movement, & the reality of living side-by-side with no citizenship rights with Jewish-Israeli settlers who have all the privileges of Israel citizenship.
But the West Bank is different than Gaza; Palestinians live isolated under the control of HAMAS - a terrorist regime - and both Egypt and Israel control the movement of people/goods/services, across the borders. We are not in the Palestinian Authority any more over there.
It is also necessary, I think, to acknowledge the unique situation of the Jewish State in this whole discussion and not to make simplistic equivalencies between white South Africa and an Ashkenazi elite in Israel today.
Also worth pointing out that Jewish Israel today (within the Green Line) is a majority-minority country in its own right, with the influx of Mizrachi Jews after 1948 - Ashkenazi ethnocracy is real to them too and change is coming to there- the demographic picture isn't so simple.
Ppl love to throw around the word 'apartheid' because it sounds bad and evil - which many people feel about Israel today - but it does no service to understanding the complexity of this conflict (or to South Africa) to use bad terminology to virtue-signal about Israel/Palestine.
Instead, we should be thinking collectively of new vocabulary to reflect the unique historical experience of Palestinians, both within the Zionist regime in the Green Line & under occupation. Let's do that hard work for them if we want a just & peaceful solution to this conflict.
Last but not least, B'Tzelem needs to be honest about the fact that it's endgame here is a 1-state solution between the river and the sea and the erasure of the Jewish character of the State of Israel, if not the state itself entirely. It's beyond disingenuous... think these claims (whether you are using the right terminology or not) are in the interest of the international consensus of the 2-state solution. But is Israel/Palestine going to become 'Rainbow Nation' or 'Zimbabwe'? I hope we'll think through that comparison as well.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Dr. Sara Yael Hirschhorn

Dr. Sara Yael Hirschhorn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SaraHirschhorn1

28 Jan 20
#1: This isn't an #Israeli-#Palestinian #peace plan, it's a U.S.-Israel conflict management/unilateral annexation plan. At moment, there is ZERO buy-in from Palestinians (who are unifying around the anti-plan pole) or regional partners (apart from an Egyptian "read carefully")
#2:Settlements - Actually this is Oslo+++. 97% of settlers in 4 blocs absorbed with some ambiguous by-pass road. 3% of settlers (including some of most radical 15 settlements) surrounded by Palestinian enclaves. Settler movement won't allow. How much Area C leftover, no idea.
#3:There is no united Jerusalem, this is convenient code-switching to call East Jerusalem Palestinian capitol "Al Quds" but this is basically same as Oslo, except Abu Dis etc is now behind the separation barrier and ringed in by Jerusalem settlements that didn't exist in 1990s
Read 11 tweets
18 Nov 19
Just tuned into the latest news: As an expert on #Israeli #settlements I have so much to say about this right now🤯 - here's a thread - but in brief - surreal and @SecPompeo may have the blood of a 3rd intifada on his hands (#1)
@SecPompeo Important to note that Benny Gantz immediately endorsed -- if anyone was still harboring any illusions that he was the "great white hope" of the peace process, I suggest you abandon them now (#2)
@SecPompeo Amb. David Friedman's assertion that this now "levels the playing field" only serves to level any Palestinian aspirations for a transparent and fair process and does little to empower the Israeli public to make any concessions either (#3)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!