The overall nature of the plots, and what the police are doing to prepare, are terrifying too. As is the general sense that the administration might not do much to stop it.
If you saw this anywhere else in the world, what would you think about that country's democracy?
The Republicans are yelling that impeaching Trump would be divisive, while Capitol Police are afraid some of their elected officials might try to kill the President.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every time I argue that less-harsh sentences are the better ones that all should receive, I hear this: "leniency for all requires severity for all first."
This strikes me as a complete miscomprehension of the politics of punishment.
Once you pass a harsh law, it's really hard to be That Guy who repeals it.
It's also why I think we should emphasize leniency when DAs set plea deals over expanding parole.* It's easier to set a shorter sentence up front than shorten a long one.
When Obama commuted Chelsea Mannings sentence, there was a lot of outrage.
But it was fascinating outrage. No one that I saw said "7 years is too short." Everyone said "1/3 of her 21 years is too short."
If the orig sentence had been 8 yrs, bet far far less outrage.
"Our party egged people on to storm the Capitol, murder a police officer, and appear to have ensured that the Capitol was under-protected in an effort to overturn a legitimate election.
You've... pointed that out. And demanded accountability.
This would be pathetic, if it weren't such clear evidence that the GOP not only have learned nothing from this, but is doubling down on its culture of right-wing victimhood.
It's just going to keep getting worse.
But seriously: this is disgusting and pathetic--and dangerous.
And again: I don't want to hear any GOPers talk about the need to "take personal responsibility" ever again.
Having stoked an insurrection, they now equate demands for accountability with "playing politics."
So this disability q is fantastic. The 25A and the Presidential Succession Act do not define "disability" and provide no method for automatically removing authority from an unwilling President.
We should stop calling it "Court Packing" and instead call it the "Court Modernization Act."
Which, to be fair, it is. Does it make sense to keep running SCOTUS the exact same way we did before penicillin, the car, the computer, pretty much all of modern life?
Which reminds me: I had a judge email me the afternoon (!!) of 9/11/01 to say he was grounded in Chicago and could just interview me then. And I said yes, bc... young, and you “don’t say no”! And so I sat in a hotel bar, watching the towers fall on repeat and just... it went bad.
With hindsight, I mean... who emails a law student to conduct an interview bc he might as well, given he’s grounded due to a national catastrophe we are STILL working thru.
He looked out the hotel window. I looked at the bar, and thus at the TVs. It was surreal. And wrong.